- -

In Silico Hemodynamics and Filtering Evaluation of a Commercial Embolic Protection Device

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

  • Estadisticas de Uso

In Silico Hemodynamics and Filtering Evaluation of a Commercial Embolic Protection Device

Show full item record

Gil Megías, A.; Quintero-Igeño, P.; Mares, A.; Serra, J.; Sánchez-Nevárez, MI.; Miralles, M. (2021). In Silico Hemodynamics and Filtering Evaluation of a Commercial Embolic Protection Device. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 49(9):2659-2670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02846-4

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/184630

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: In Silico Hemodynamics and Filtering Evaluation of a Commercial Embolic Protection Device
Author: Gil Megías, Antonio Quintero-Igeño, Pedro-Manuel Mares, Andrea Serra, Juan Sánchez-Nevárez, Manuel Ignacio Miralles, Manuel
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Máquinas y Motores Térmicos - Departament de Màquines i Motors Tèrmics
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica - Departament d'Expressió Gràfica Arquitectònica
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] During the last years, several kinds of Embolic Protection Devices (EPD) have been developed, with the aim of minimizing complication caused by thrombi generated during Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS). These devices are ...[+]
Subjects: Computational fluid dynamics , Embolic protection device , Discrete element method , Filtration efficiency , Hemodynamics
Copyrigths: Reserva de todos los derechos
Source:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering. (issn: 0090-6964 )
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02846-4
Publisher:
Springer-Verlag
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02846-4
Project ID:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UPV/SUBPROGRAMA PARA EL DESARROLLO DE PROYECTOS DE INNOVACIÓN UPV/IIS LA FE/PI2020-11/ES/Prototipo de dispositivo de protección embólica: Análisis de eficacia y resistencia al flujo mediante mecánica de fluidos computacional/DPECFD
Thanks:
This study ws funded by upv-la fe 2020 subprograma proyectos de innovacion (Grant No. DPECFD).
Type: Artículo

References

Anderson Jr, J. D. Fundamental of Aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill Education, 2010.

Coggia, M., O. Goëau-Brissonnière, J. L. Duval, J. P. Leschi, M. Letort, and M. D. Nagel. Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty: an experimental study. J. Vasc. Surg. 31:550–557, 2000.

Cundall, P. A., and O. D. L. Strack. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique. 29:47–65, 1979. [+]
Anderson Jr, J. D. Fundamental of Aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill Education, 2010.

Coggia, M., O. Goëau-Brissonnière, J. L. Duval, J. P. Leschi, M. Letort, and M. D. Nagel. Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty: an experimental study. J. Vasc. Surg. 31:550–557, 2000.

Cundall, P. A., and O. D. L. Strack. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique. 29:47–65, 1979.

Deyranlou, A., J. H. Naish, C. A. Miller, A. Revell, and A. Keshmiri. Numerical study of atrial fibrillation effects on flow distribution in aortic circulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 48:1–18, 2020.

Finol, E. A., C. M. Scotti, I. Verdinelli, C. H. Amon, and M. H. Wholey. Performance assessment of embolic protection filters for carotid artery stenting. Model. Med. Biol. VI. 1:133–142, 2005.

Finol, E. A., G. M. Siewiorek, C. M. Scotti, M. H. M. H. Wholey, and M. H. M. H. Wholey. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J. Endovasc. Ther. 15:177–185, 2008.

Graf, C., and J. P. Barras. Rheological properties of human blood plasma—a comparison of measurements with three different viscometers. Experientia. 35:224–225, 1979.

Haidekker, M. A., A. G. Tsai, T. Brady, H. Y. Stevens, J. A. Frangos, E. Theodorakis, and M. Intaglietta. A novel approach to blood plasma viscosity measurement using fluorescent molecular rotors. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 282:H1609–H1614, 2002.

Hart, J. P., P. Peeters, J. Verbist, K. Deloose, and M. Bosiers. Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting? J. Vasc. Surg. 44:725–730, 2006.

Heistad, D. D., M. L. Marcus, and S. Mueller. Measurement of cerebral blood flow with microspheres. Arch. Neurol. 34:657–659, 1977.

Hendriks, J. M., J. D. Zindler, A. Van Der Lugt, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. R. H. M. Van Sambeek, J. L. Bosch, and L. C. Van Dijk. Embolic protection filters for carotid stenting: differences in flow obstruction depending on filter construction. J. Endovasc. Ther. 13:47–50, 2006.

Howell, M., Z. Krajcer, K. Dougherty, N. Strickman, M. Skolkin, B. Toombs, and D. Paniagua. Correlation of periprocedural systolic blood pressure changes with neurological events in high-risk carotid stent patients. J. Endovasc. Ther. 9:810–816, 2002.

Johnson, S., S. Duffy, G. Gunning, M. Gilvarry, J. P. McGarry, and P. E. McHugh. Review of mechanical testing and modelling of thrombus material for vascular implant and device design. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45:2494–2508, 2017.

Karimi, S., M. Dabagh, P. Vasava, M. Dadvar, B. Dabir, and P. Jalali. Effect of rheological models on the hemodynamics within human aorta: CFD study on CT image-based geometry. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 207:42–52, 2014.

Kurzhals, A., J. B. Matthies, R. Andresen, C. Wissgott, K. P. Schmitz, N. Grabow, and W. Schmidt. Efficiency test of current carotid embolic protection devices. Biomed. Tech. 62:349–355, 2017.

Kwon, B. J., M. H. Han, H. S. Kang, and C. Jung. Protection filter-related events in extracranial carotid artery stenting: a single-center experience. J. Endovasc. Ther. 13:711–722, 2006.

Kwon, O. K., S. H. Kim, E. A. Jacobsen, and M. P. Marks. Clinical implications of internal carotid artery flow impairment caused by filter occlusion during carotid artery stenting. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33:494–499, 2012.

Lee, S. H., S. Kang, N. Hur, and S.-K. Jeong. A fluid-structure interaction analysis on hemodynamics in carotid artery based on patient-specific clinical data. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 26:3821–3831, 2012.

Louvelle, L., M. Doyle, G. Van Arsdell, C. Amon, G. Van Arsdell, and C. Amon. The effect of geometric and hemodynamic parameters on blood flow efficiency in repaired tetralogy of fallot patients. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02771-6.

Markus, H. S., A. King, M. Shipley, R. Topakian, M. Cullinane, S. Reihill, N. M. Bornstein, and A. Schaafsma. Asymptomatic embolisation for prediction of stroke in the Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study (ACES): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 9:663–671, 2010.

Menter, F. R. Zonal two equation κ-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference, 1993, 1993.

Montorsi, P., L. Caputi, S. Galli, E. Ciceri, G. Ballerini, M. Agrifoglio, P. Ravagnani, D. Trabattoni, G. Pontone, F. Fabbiocchi, A. Loaldi, E. Parati, D. Andreini, F. Veglia, and A. L. Bartorelli. Microembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque: a randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58:1656–1663, 2011.

Morris, D. R., K. Ayabe, T. Inoue, N. Sakai, R. Bulbulia, A. Halliday, and S. Goto. Evidence-based carotid interventions for stroke prevention: state-of-the-art review. J Atheroscler Thromb 24:0–000, 2017.

Mousa, A. Y., J. E. Campbell, A. F. Aburahma, and M. C. Bates. Current update of cerebral embolic protection devices. J. Vasc. Surg. 56:1429–1437, 2012.

Mukherjee, D., N. D. Jani, J. Narvid, and S. C. Shadden. The role of circle of willis anatomy variations in cardio-embolic stroke: a patient-specific simulation based study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 46:1128–1145, 2018.

Nevárez, M. I. S., E. P. Andani, and M. M. Hernández. Hemodynamic impact analysis of mesh-type embolic protection devices in an in vitro model. Angiologia. 72:178–185, 2020.

Papamanolis, L., H. J. Kim, C. Jaquet, M. Sinclair, M. Schaap, I. Danad, P. van Diemen, P. Knaapen, L. Najman, H. Talbot, C. A. Taylor, and I. Vignon-Clementel. Myocardial perfusion simulation for coronary artery disease: a coupled patient-specific multiscale model. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 49:1432–1447, 2021.

Pope, S. B. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Di Renzo, A., and F. P. Di Maio. Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59:525–541, 2004.

Ryan, N. W., and M. M. Johnson. Transistion from laminar to turbulent flow in pipes. AIChE J. 5:433–435, 1959.

Shadden, S. C., and A. Arzani. Lagrangian postprocessing of computational hemodynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43:41–58, 2014.

Siewiorek, G. M., M. K. Eskandari, and E. A. Finol. The AngioguardTM embolic protection device. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 5:287–296, 2008.

Siewiorek, G. M., and E. A. Finol. Computational modeling of distal protection filters. J. Endovasc. Ther. 17:777–788, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1583/10-3178.1.

Siewiorek, G. M., and E. A. Finol. Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Embolic Protection. ASME 2010 Summer Bioengineering Conference, SBC 2010 627–628, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1115/SBC2010-19693

Siewiorek, G. M., R. T. Krafty, M. H. Wholey, and E. A. Finol. The association of clinical variables and filter design with carotid artery stenting thirty-day outcome. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 42:282–291, 2011.

Siewiorek, G. M., M. H. Wholey, and E. A. Finol. Vascular resistance in the carotid artery: an in vitro investigation of embolic protection filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 19:1467–1476, 2008.

Siewiorek, G. M., M. H. Wholey, and E. A. Finol. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection filters: Pulsatile flow conditions. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 16:735–743, 2009.

Spiegel, M., T. Redel, J. J. Zhang, T. Struffert, J. Hornegger, R. G. Grossman, A. Doerfler, and C. Karmonik. Tetrahedral vs. polyhedral mesh size evaluation on flow velocity and wall shear stress for cerebral hemodynamic simulation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 14:9–22, 2011.

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. V&V 40-2018 Assessing Credibility of Computational Modeling Through Verification and Validation: Application to Medical Devices. 2018.

Traenka, C., S. T. Engelter, M. M. Brown, J. Dobson, C. Frost, and L. H. Bonati. Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: a surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Stroke J. 4:127–143, 2019.

Wilcox, D. C. Multiscale model for turbulent flows. AIAA J. 26:1311–1320, 1988.

Zhou, W., B. D. Baughman, S. Soman, M. Wintermark, L. C. Lazzeroni, E. Hitchner, J. Bhat, and A. Rosen. Volume of subclinical embolic infarct correlates to long-term cognitive changes after carotid revascularization. J. Vasc. Surg. 65:686–694, 2017.

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record