- -

Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Barberá Tomás, JD.; Azagra-Caro, JM.; Deste Cukierman, P. (2021). Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09898-7

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/186221

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: BarberaAzagra-Car ...
Tamaño: 573.5Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir/Preview

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section
Autor: Barberá Tomás, José David Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. Deste Cukierman, Pablo
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria
Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Theoretical frameworks acknowledge the dynamic and evolving nature of technology transfer. However, there is a scarcity of empirical work in the field incorporating a dynamic and longitudinal perspective. Several ...[+]
Palabras clave: Technology transfer , University-industry interaction , Longitudinal studies , Time , Evolution
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
The Journal of Technology Transfer. (issn: 0892-9912 )
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-021-09898-7
Editorial:
Springer-Verlag
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09898-7
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-101232-B-I00/ES/MOVILIZACION DEL CONOCIMIENTO PARA LA CIENCIA Y LA INNOVACION: ANALISIS DE IMPACTO Y PROCESOS EN REDES DE INVESTIGACION BIOMEDICA/
Agradecimientos:
The editors are grateful to 2018 T2S Conference participants for their comments on the papers published in this special section. We thank the Polytechnic University of Valencia and the Polytechnic Innovation City for their ...[+]
Tipo: Artículo

References

Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & Jiménez, M. (2021). Effects of knowledge spillovers between competitors on patent quality: What patent citations reveal about a global duopoly. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue).

Andersson, D. E., Galaso, P., & Sáiz, P. (2019). Patent collaboration networks in Sweden and Spain during the Second Industrial Revolution. Industry and Innovation, 26(9), 1075–1102.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Barberá-Tomás, D., Edwards-Schachter, M., & Tur, E. M. (2017). Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent. Research Policy, 46(2), 463–474. [+]
Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & Jiménez, M. (2021). Effects of knowledge spillovers between competitors on patent quality: What patent citations reveal about a global duopoly. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue).

Andersson, D. E., Galaso, P., & Sáiz, P. (2019). Patent collaboration networks in Sweden and Spain during the Second Industrial Revolution. Industry and Innovation, 26(9), 1075–1102.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Barberá-Tomás, D., Edwards-Schachter, M., & Tur, E. M. (2017). Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent. Research Policy, 46(2), 463–474.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Tijssen, R. J., Tur, E. M., & Yegros-Yegros, A. (2019). University-industry scientific production and the Great Recession. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 210–220.

Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217–233.

Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2.

Carayol, N., & Carpentier, E. (2021). The spread of academic invention: A nationwide case study on French data (1995–2012). The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue).

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Elsevier.

Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017). A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 923–956.

D’Este, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., Woolley, R., & Amara, N. (2018). How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework. Science and Public Policy, 45(6), 752–763.

Dolmans, S. A. M., Walrave, B., Read, S., & van Stijn, N. (2021). Knowledge transfer to industry: How academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue).

Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2004). Truth for its own sake: Academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva, 42(2), 105–126.

Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300.

Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

Giones, F., Kleine, K., & Tegtmeier, S. (2021). Students as scientists’ co-pilots in the onset of technology transfer: A two-way learning process. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue).

Granqvist, N., & Gustafsson, R. (2016). Temporal institutional work. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1009–1035.

Hmieleski, K. M., & Powell, E. E. (2018). The psychological foundations of university science commercialization: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 43–77.

Isaeva, I., Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2021). How firms use coordination activities in university-industry collaboration: Adjusting to or steering a research center? The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue).

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

Langley, A. (2007). Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282.

Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.

Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286.

Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press.

Martin, B., & Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The origin and evolution of the university species. Organisation of mode, 2.

Martin, B. R. (2003). The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. Science and innovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 7–29.

Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.

Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Patenting and licensing university inventions: Lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 317–355.

Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Nowotny, H., Limoges, C., & Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications.

Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114.

Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–648.

Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2017). Time, temporality and process studies. The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies, 402, 416.

Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R., Tsoukas, H., & Langley, A. (Eds.). (2021). Time, temporality, and history in process organization studies. Oxford University Press.

Romero-De-Pablos, A., & Azagra-Caro, J. M. (2009). Internationalisation of patents by Public Research Organisations from a historical and an economic perspective. Scientometrics, 79(2), 329–340.

Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348.

Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567.

Skute, I., Zalewska-Kurek, K., Hatak, I., & de Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2019). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 916–947.

Spaapen, J., & Van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211–218.

Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551–561.

Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 169–188.

Van Oorschot, K. E., Akkermans, H., Sengupta, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Anatomy of a decision trap in complex new product development projects. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 285–307.

Vick, T. E., & Robertson, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of UK university–industry collaboration for knowledge transfer: A future research agenda. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 579–590.

Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation (pp. 51–74). Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society.

Ye, Y., & Crispeels, T. (2021). The role of former collaborations in strengthening interorganizational links: Evidence from the evolution of the Chinese innovation network. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue).

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem