- -

Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: BarberaAzagra-Car ...
Tamaño: 573.5Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Barberá Tomás, José David es_ES
dc.contributor.author Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Deste Cukierman, Pablo es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-16T18:04:17Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-16T18:04:17Z
dc.date.issued 2021-10-16 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0892-9912 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/186221
dc.description.abstract [EN] Theoretical frameworks acknowledge the dynamic and evolving nature of technology transfer. However, there is a scarcity of empirical work in the field incorporating a dynamic and longitudinal perspective. Several literature reviews call for technology transfer research agendas to include longitudinal studies. In response to such calls, this special section comprises selected contributions to the 2018 Technology Transfer Society (T2S) Conference which address this gap from different angles. The three qualitative and three quantitative works chosen contain research questions and methodologies related to dynamic aspects of technology transfer. We argue that historical and processual studies offer additional new directions es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The editors are grateful to 2018 T2S Conference participants for their comments on the papers published in this special section. We thank the Polytechnic University of Valencia and the Polytechnic Innovation City for their support and hospitality. We are indebted to the reviewers of the papers submitted to this special section. The Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities funded Joaquin M. Azagra-Caro's and Pablo D'Este's contribution to the special section as part of the CSO2016-79045-C2-2-R and the RTI2018-101232-B-100 Projects of the Spanish National R&D&I Plan, respectively. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof The Journal of Technology Transfer es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Technology transfer es_ES
dc.subject University-industry interaction es_ES
dc.subject Longitudinal studies es_ES
dc.subject Time es_ES
dc.subject Evolution es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10961-021-09898-7 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-101232-B-I00/ES/MOVILIZACION DEL CONOCIMIENTO PARA LA CIENCIA Y LA INNOVACION: ANALISIS DE IMPACTO Y PROCESOS EN REDES DE INVESTIGACION BIOMEDICA/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Barberá Tomás, JD.; Azagra-Caro, JM.; Deste Cukierman, P. (2021). Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09898-7 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09898-7 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 9 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\452538 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades es_ES
dc.description.references Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & Jiménez, M. (2021). Effects of knowledge spillovers between competitors on patent quality: What patent citations reveal about a global duopoly. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue). es_ES
dc.description.references Andersson, D. E., Galaso, P., & Sáiz, P. (2019). Patent collaboration networks in Sweden and Spain during the Second Industrial Revolution. Industry and Innovation, 26(9), 1075–1102. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Barberá-Tomás, D., Edwards-Schachter, M., & Tur, E. M. (2017). Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent. Research Policy, 46(2), 463–474. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Tijssen, R. J., Tur, E. M., & Yegros-Yegros, A. (2019). University-industry scientific production and the Great Recession. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 210–220. es_ES
dc.description.references Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217–233. es_ES
dc.description.references Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. es_ES
dc.description.references Carayol, N., & Carpentier, E. (2021). The spread of academic invention: A nationwide case study on French data (1995–2012). The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue). es_ES
dc.description.references Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017). A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 923–956. es_ES
dc.description.references D’Este, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., Woolley, R., & Amara, N. (2018). How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework. Science and Public Policy, 45(6), 752–763. es_ES
dc.description.references Dolmans, S. A. M., Walrave, B., Read, S., & van Stijn, N. (2021). Knowledge transfer to industry: How academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue). es_ES
dc.description.references Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2004). Truth for its own sake: Academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva, 42(2), 105–126. es_ES
dc.description.references Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. es_ES
dc.description.references Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. es_ES
dc.description.references Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. es_ES
dc.description.references Giones, F., Kleine, K., & Tegtmeier, S. (2021). Students as scientists’ co-pilots in the onset of technology transfer: A two-way learning process. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue). es_ES
dc.description.references Granqvist, N., & Gustafsson, R. (2016). Temporal institutional work. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1009–1035. es_ES
dc.description.references Hmieleski, K. M., & Powell, E. E. (2018). The psychological foundations of university science commercialization: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 43–77. es_ES
dc.description.references Isaeva, I., Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2021). How firms use coordination activities in university-industry collaboration: Adjusting to or steering a research center? The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue). es_ES
dc.description.references Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. es_ES
dc.description.references Langley, A. (2007). Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282. es_ES
dc.description.references Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. es_ES
dc.description.references Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286. es_ES
dc.description.references Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2). Anthem press. es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, B., & Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The origin and evolution of the university species. Organisation of mode, 2. es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, B. R. (2003). The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. Science and innovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 7–29. es_ES
dc.description.references Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex. es_ES
dc.description.references Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Patenting and licensing university inventions: Lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 317–355. es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand. es_ES
dc.description.references Nowotny, H., Limoges, C., & Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications. es_ES
dc.description.references Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. es_ES
dc.description.references Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–648. es_ES
dc.description.references Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2017). Time, temporality and process studies. The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies, 402, 416. es_ES
dc.description.references Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R., Tsoukas, H., & Langley, A. (Eds.). (2021). Time, temporality, and history in process organization studies. Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Romero-De-Pablos, A., & Azagra-Caro, J. M. (2009). Internationalisation of patents by Public Research Organisations from a historical and an economic perspective. Scientometrics, 79(2), 329–340. es_ES
dc.description.references Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348. es_ES
dc.description.references Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. es_ES
dc.description.references Skute, I., Zalewska-Kurek, K., Hatak, I., & de Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2019). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 916–947. es_ES
dc.description.references Spaapen, J., & Van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211–218. es_ES
dc.description.references Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551–561. es_ES
dc.description.references Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 169–188. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Oorschot, K. E., Akkermans, H., Sengupta, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Anatomy of a decision trap in complex new product development projects. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 285–307. es_ES
dc.description.references Vick, T. E., & Robertson, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of UK university–industry collaboration for knowledge transfer: A future research agenda. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 579–590. es_ES
dc.description.references Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation (pp. 51–74). Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. es_ES
dc.description.references Ye, Y., & Crispeels, T. (2021). The role of former collaborations in strengthening interorganizational links: Evidence from the evolution of the Chinese innovation network. The Journal of Technology Transfer (this issue). es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem