- -

Hacia las métricas de contexto: clasificación de citas en Web of Science

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Hacia las métricas de contexto: clasificación de citas en Web of Science

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Orduña Malea, E. (2022). Hacia las métricas de contexto: clasificación de citas en Web of Science. Anuario ThinkEPI. 16(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a32

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/190536

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Hacia las métricas de contexto: clasificación de citas en Web of Science
Otro titulo: Toward context metrics: citation classification on the Web of Science
Autor: Orduña Malea, Enrique
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Bellas Artes - Facultat de Belles Arts
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] The purpose of this note is to describe the new citation context classification feature provided by Web of Science, in which citations received by publications are classified into five categories (Background, Basis, ...[+]


[EN] El objetivo de esta nota es describir la nueva funcionalidad de clasificación de citas por contexto proporcionada por Web of Science (WoS), en la que las citas recibidas por un trabajo se clasifican en cinco categorías ...[+]
Palabras clave: Teoría de la citación , Clasificación de citas , Web of Science , WoS , Evaluación de la investigación , Citations theory , Classification of citations , Research evaluation
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
Anuario ThinkEPI. (issn: 1886-6344 )
DOI: 10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a32
Editorial:
Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a32
Tipo: Artículo

References

Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2008). “What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior”. Journal of documentation, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150

Clarivate Analytics (2022a). “New WoS February 18 release notes”. Clarivate, 18 febrero. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/release-notes/wos/new-wos-february-18-release-notes

Clarivate Analytics (2022b). “New WOS May 12 release notes. 12 de mayo”. Clarivate, 12 mayo. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/release-notes/wos/new-wos-may-12-release-notes [+]
Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2008). “What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior”. Journal of documentation, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150

Clarivate Analytics (2022a). “New WoS February 18 release notes”. Clarivate, 18 febrero. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/release-notes/wos/new-wos-february-18-release-notes

Clarivate Analytics (2022b). “New WOS May 12 release notes. 12 de mayo”. Clarivate, 12 mayo. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/release-notes/wos/new-wos-may-12-release-notes

Cozzens, Susan E. (1989). “What do citations count? The rhetorical-first model”. Scientometrics, v. 15, n. 5-6, pp. 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017064

Cronin, Blaise (1981). “The need for a theory of citing”. Journal of documentation, v. 37, n. 1, pp. 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026703

Cronin, Blaise (1984). The Citation Process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham. ISBN: 978 0 947568 01 8

Cronin, Blaise (1998). “Metatheorizing citation”. Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02458393

Cronin, Blaise; Snyder, Herbert W.; Rosenbaum, Howard; Martinson, Anna; Callahan, Ewa (1998). “Invoked on the Web”. Journal of the American society for information science, v. 49, n. 14, pp. 1319-1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:14%3C1319::AID-ASI9%3E3.0.CO;2-W

Garfield, Eugene (1998). “Random thoughts on citationology: Its theory and practice”. Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458396

Gilbert, G. Nigel (1977). “Referencing as persuasión”. Social studies of science, v. 7, n. 1, pp. 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700112

Glänzel, Wolfgang; Debackere, Koenraad; Thijs, Bart; Schubert, András (2006). “A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy”. Scientometrics, v. 67 n. 2, pp. 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0098-9

Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. ISBN: ISBN: 978 0 674792913

Leydesdorff, Loet (1998). “Theories of citation?”. Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02458391

Luhmann, Niklas (2012). Theory of society (v. 1). Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 804739504

Ma, Lai (2022). “Information, platformized”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, first online. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24713

Merton, Robert K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago press. ISBN: 0 226 52092 7

Moed, Henk F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer. ISBN: 978 1 4020 3714 6

Singh-Chawla, Dalmeet (2022). “Should AI have a role in assessing research quality?”. Nature news, 14 octubre. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03294-3

Small, Henry (1982). “Citation context analysis”. In: Dervin, Brenda; Voigt, Melvin J. (eds.). Progress in communication sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 287-310. ISBN: 0 89391 060 0

Small, Henry (2004). “On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation”. Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 1, pp. 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000027310.68393.bc

Tahamtan, Imán; Bornmann, Lutz (2022). “The Social Systems Citation Theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links”. Profesional de la información, v. 31, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.jul.11

Thelwall, Mike (2006). “Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework”. Journal of the American Society for information science and technology, v. 57, n. 1, pp. 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20253

Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (1998). “In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much”. Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02458401

Wouters, Paul (1999). “Beyond the Holy Grail: From citation theory to indicator theories”. Scientometrics, v. 44, n. 3, pp. 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02458496

Yutong, Fei; Bertin, Marc (2022). “The multilingual aspect of citation contexts”. In: 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Granada 7-9 septiembre. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6957504

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem