- -

Antimicrobials in a rabbit semen extender: effects on reproduction

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Antimicrobials in a rabbit semen extender: effects on reproduction

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Rouillon, C.; Camugli, S.; Carion, O.; Echegaray, A.; Delhomme, G.; Schmitt, E. (2022). Antimicrobials in a rabbit semen extender: effects on reproduction. World Rabbit Science. 30(4):295-308. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2022.17132

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/191228

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Antimicrobials in a rabbit semen extender: effects on reproduction
Autor: Rouillon, Charlène Camugli, Sabine Carion, Olivier Echegaray, Arantxa Delhomme, Guy Schmitt, Eric
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] The use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics was legally restricted by the European Commission in March 2019. Since the extender for rabbit semen Galap® contained this antibiotic, it became necessary to modify it. The purpose ...[+]
Palabras clave: Rabbit , Semen , Dilution media , Bacterial charges , Motility , Fertility
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
Fuente:
World Rabbit Science. (issn: 1257-5011 ) (eissn: 1989-8886 )
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.2022.17132
Editorial:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2022.17132
Agradecimientos:
This study was supported by IMV Technologies
Tipo: Artículo

References

Althouse G.C. 2008. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 43 Suppl 2: 374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.x

Althouse G.C., Kuster C.E., Clark S.G., Weisiger R.M. 2000. Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 53: 1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00261-2

Althouse G.C., Lu K.G. 2005. Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 63: 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.031 [+]
Althouse G.C. 2008. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 43 Suppl 2: 374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.x

Althouse G.C., Kuster C.E., Clark S.G., Weisiger R.M. 2000. Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 53: 1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00261-2

Althouse G.C., Lu K.G. 2005. Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 63: 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.031

Althouse G.C., Pierdon M.S., Lu K.G. 2008. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 70: 1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.010

Aurich C., Spergser J. 2007. Influence of bacteria and gentamycin on cooled-stored stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 67: 912-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.11.004

Berendsen B., Elbers I., Stolker L. 2011. The stability of antibiotics in matrix and reference solutions determined using a straight-forward procedure applying mass spectrometric detection. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess., 28: 1657-1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2011.604045

Bresciani C., Cabassi C.S., Morini G., Taddei S., Bettini R., Bigliardi E., Ianni F.D., Sabbioni A., Parmigiani E. 2014. Boar Semen Bacterial Contamination in Italy and Antibiotic Efficacy in a Modified Extender. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 3082. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3082

Brun J.M., Theau-Clément M., Bolet G. 2002. The relationship between rabbit semen characteristics and reproductive performance after artificial insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 70: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00197-X

Bussalleu E., Yeste M., Sepúlveda L., Torner E., Pinart E., Bonet S. 2011. Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 127: 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.07.018

Daniel N., Renard J.P. 2010. Artificial Insemination in Rabbits. Cold Spring Harb Protoc., https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5358

Duracka M., Lukac N., Kacaniova M., Kantor A., Hleba L., Ondruska L., Tvrda E. 2019. Antibiotics versus Natural Biomolecules: The Case of in vitro Induced Bacteriospermia by Enterococcus faecalis in Rabbit Semen. Molecules 24: 4329. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234329

Francisco E.M. 2018. Fluoroquinolone and quinolone antibiotics: PRAC recommends new restrictions on use following review of disabling potentially long-lasting side effects. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/fluoroquinolonequinolone-antibiotics-prac-recommends-new-restrictionsuse-following-review Accessed December 2020.

Fraczek M., Kurpisz M. 2015. Mechanisms of the harmful effects of bacterial semen infection on ejaculated human spermatozoa: potential inflammatory markers in semen. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 53: 201-217. https://doi.org/10.5603/fhc.a2015.0019

Gadea J. 2003. Semen extenders used in the artificial insemination of swine: Review. Span. J. Agric. Res. 17-28. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2003012-17

Gloria A., Contri A., Wegher L., Vignola G., Dellamaria D., Carluccio A. 2014. The effects of antibiotic additions to extenders on fresh and frozen-thawed bull semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 150: 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.08.012

Holtz W., Foote, R.H. 1978. Composition of rabbit semen and the origin of several constituents. Biol. Reprod., 18: 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod18.2.286

Hudzicki J. 2009. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 23 pp.

International Rabbit Reproduction Group (IRRG). 2005. Recommendations and guidelines for applied reproduction trials with rabbit does. World Rabbit Sci., 13: 147-164. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2005.521

Jarvis S., Day J.E.L., Reed B. 2005. BSAS Ethical Policy British Society of Animal Science Ethical guidelines for research in animal science. In Proc. of the British Society of Animal Science, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752756200011571

Koppers A.J., De Iuliis G.N., Finnie J.M., McLaughlin E.A., Aitken R.J. 2008. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J. Clin. Endocrino. Metabo., 93: 3199-3207. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-2616

Lavara R., Mocé E., Lavara F., Viudes de Castro M.P., Vicente J.S. 2005. Do parameters of seminal quality correlate with the results of on-farm inseminations in rabbits? Theriogenology, 64: 1130-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.01.009

Lebas F., Coudert P., De Rochambeau H. 1997. The Rabbit: husbandry, health, and production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.

Maes D., Nauwynck H., Rijsselaere T., Mateusen B., Vyt P., de Kruif A., Van Soom A. 2008. Diseases in swine transmitted by artificial insemination: an overview. Theriogenology, 70: 1337-1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.018

Maroto Martín L.O., Muñoz E., De Cupere F., Van Driessche E., Echemendia-Blanco D., Rodríguez J., Beeckmans S. 2010. Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 120: 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.03.008

Mercier P., Rideaud P. 1990. Bactériologie du sperme frais de lapin - Etude préliminaire. INRAE Productions Animales 3: 215-221. https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.1990.3.3.4378

Morrell J., Wallgren M. 2014. Alternatives to Antibiotics in Semen Extenders: A Review. Pathogens, 3: 934-946. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens3040934

R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Theau-Clément M., Ailloud E., Sanchez A., Saleil G., Brun J.M. 2016. Relationships between rabbit semen characteristics and fertilising ability after insemination. Animal, 10: 426-431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002372

Waberski D., Luther A.M., Grünther B., Jäkel H., Henning H., Vogel C., Peralta W., Weitze K.F. 2019. Sperm function in vitro and fertility after antibiotic-free, hypothermic storage of liquid preserved boar semen. Sci. Rep., 9: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51319-1

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem