- -

Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Carpitella, S.; Mzougui, I.; Izquierdo Sebastián, J. (2022). Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance. OPSEARCH. 59(3):769-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-021-00568-8

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/191983

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance
Autor: Carpitella, Silvia Mzougui, Ilyas Izquierdo Sebastián, Joaquín
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers de Telecomunicació
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Management of complex supply networks is a fundamental business topic today. Especially in the presence of many and diverse stakeholders, identifying and assessing those risks having a potential negative impact on the ...[+]
Palabras clave: Supply chain risk , Supply chain management , Multi-criteria decision-making , ELECTRE TRI
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
OPSEARCH. (issn: 0030-3887 )
DOI: 10.1007/s12597-021-00568-8
Editorial:
Springer-Verlag
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-021-00568-8
Tipo: Artículo

References

Abdel-Basset, M., Gunasekaran, M., Mohamed, M., Chilamkurti, N.: A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Future Generation Comput. Syst. 90, 489–502 (2019)

Akram, M., Ilyas, F., Garg, H.: Multi-criteria group decision making based on electre i method in pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput. 24(5), 3425–3453 (2020)

Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Childe, S.J.: Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view. Prod. Plan. Control 29(14), 1158–1174 (2018) [+]
Abdel-Basset, M., Gunasekaran, M., Mohamed, M., Chilamkurti, N.: A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Future Generation Comput. Syst. 90, 489–502 (2019)

Akram, M., Ilyas, F., Garg, H.: Multi-criteria group decision making based on electre i method in pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput. 24(5), 3425–3453 (2020)

Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Childe, S.J.: Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view. Prod. Plan. Control 29(14), 1158–1174 (2018)

Awoyemi, B.S., Alfa, A.S., Maharaj, B.T.: Network restoration for next-generation communication and computing networks. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2018 (2018)

Bharsakade, R.S., Acharya, P., Ganapathy, L., Tiwari, M.K.: A lean approach to healthcare management using multi criteria decision making. Opsearch, 1–26 (2021)

Bhutta, K.S., Huq, F.: Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. Supp. Chain Manage. Int. J. (2002)

Carpitella, S., Ocaña-Levario, S.J., Benítez, J., Certa, A., Izquierdo, J.: A hybrid multi-criteria approach to gpr image mining applied to water supply system maintenance. J. Appl. Geophys. 159, 754–764 (2018)

Carpitella, S., Herrera, M., Certa, A., Izquierdo, J.: Updating the ospf routing protocol for communication networks by optimal decision-making over the k-shortest path algorithm. Modell. Eng. Human Behav. 2019, 118 (2019)

Carpitella, S., Certa, A., Izquierdo, J., La Cascia, M.: Multi-criteria decision-making approach for modular enterprise resource planning sorting problems. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. (2021) (in press)

Certa, A., Carpitella, S., Enea, M., Micale, R.: A multi criteria decision making approach to support the risk management: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 21th Summer School “Francesco Turco”, Naples, Italy, September, pp. 13–15 (2016)

Chand, M., Raj, T., Shankar, R., Agarwal, A.: Select the best supply chain by risk analysis for indian industries environment using mcdm approaches. Int. J. Benchmark. (2017)

Chang, K.-H., Cheng, C.-H.: Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy owa and dematel method. J. Intell. Manufact. 22(2), 113–129 (2011)

Chopra, S., Meindl, P., Kalra, D.V.: Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, vol. 232. Pearson, Boston, MA (2013)

Christopher, M., Mena, C., Khan, O., Yurt, O.: Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supp. Chain Manage. Int. J. (2011)

Chu, C.-Y., Park, K., Kremer, G.E.: A global supply chain risk management framework: an application of text-mining to identify region-specific supply chain risks. Adv. Eng. Inform. 45, 101053 (2020)

Committee, I.T., et al.: Analysis techniques for system reliability-procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (fmea). IEC 60812 (2006)

Creazza, A., Colicchia, C., Spiezia, S., Dallari, F.: Who cares? supply chain managers’ perceptions regarding cyber supply chain risk management in the digital transformation era. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. (2021)

Curkovic, S., Scannell, T., Wagner, B.: Using fmea for supply chain risk management. Modern Manage. Sci. Eng. 1(2), 251–265 (2013)

Fan, Y., Stevenson, M.: A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. (2018)

Garvey, M.D., Carnovale, S.: The rippled newsvendor: a new inventory framework for modelling supply chain risk severity in the presence of risk propagation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 107752 (2020)

Gaudenzi, B., Borghesi, A.: Managing risks in the supply chain using the ahp method. Int. J. Logist. Manage. (2006)

Ghadge, A., Dani, S., Kalawsky, R.: Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. Int. J. logist. Manage. (2012)

Ghasimi, S.A., Ramli, R., Saibani, N.: A genetic algorithm for optimizing defective goods supply chain costs using jit logistics and each-cycle lengths. Appl. Math. Modell. 38(4), 1534–1547 (2014)

Giannakis, M., Papadopoulos, T.: Supply chain sustainability: a risk management approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171, 455–470 (2016)

Gonçalves, A.T.P., Araújo, M.V.P.d., Mól, A.L.R., Rocha, F.A.F.d.: Application of the electre tri method for supplier classification in supply chains. Pesquisa Operacional 41 (2021)

Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Vafadarnikjoo, A.: Intuitionistic fuzzy based dematel method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Exp. Syst. Appl. 42(20), 7207–7220 (2015)

Habib, K., Sprecher, B., Young, S.B.: Covid-19 impacts on metal supply: how does 2020 differ from previous supply chain disruptions? Resour. Conserv. Recycling 165, 105229 (2020)

Haren, P., Simchi-Levi, D.: How coronavirus could impact the global supply chain by mid-march. Harvard Bus. Rev. 28 (2020)

Hegde, S., Koolagudi, S.G., Bhattacharya, S.: Path restoration in source routed software defined networks. In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), pp. 720–725. IEEE (2017)

Heidari, S.S., Khanbabaei, M., Sabzehparvar, M.: A model for supply chain risk management in the automotive industry using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy topsis. Benchmark. Int. J. (2018)

Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., Talluri, S.: Supply chain risk management: a literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(16), 5031–5069 (2015)

Jiang, B., Baker, R.C., Frazier, G.V.: An analysis of job dissatisfaction and turnover to reduce global supply chain risk: evidence from china. J. Oper. Manage. 27(2), 169–184 (2009)

Junaid, M., Xue, Y., Syed, M.W., Li, J.Z., Ziaullah, M.: A neutrosophic ahp and topsis framework for supply chain risk assessment in automotive industry of pakistan. Sustainability 12(1), 154 (2020)

Karmaker, C.L., Ahmed, T., Ahmed, S., Ali, S.M., Moktadir, M.A., Kabir, G.: Improving supply chain sustainability in the context of covid-19 pandemic in an emerging economy: exploring drivers using an integrated model. Sustain. Prod. Consump. (2020)

Kim, S.C., Shin, K.S.: Negotiation model for optimal replenishment planning considering defects under the vmi and jit environment. Asian J. Ship. Logisit. 35(3), 147–153 (2019)

Kuipers, F.A.: An overview of algorithms for network survivability. Int. Scholar. Res. Notices 2012 (2012)

Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A.R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., Bansal, R.: A review of multi criteria decision making (mcdm) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69, 596–609 (2017a)

Kumar, D., Garg, C.P.: Evaluating sustainable supply chain indicators using fuzzy ahp. Benchmark. Int. J. (2017)

Kumar, P., Singh, R.K., Vaish, A.: Suppliers’ green performance evaluation using fuzzy extended electre approach. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 19(3), 809–821 (2017b)

Kumar, V., Vrat, P., Shankar, R.: Prioritization of strategies to overcome the barriers in industry 4.0: a hybrid mcdm approach. Opsearch, 1–40 (2021)

Lau, H., Tsang, Y.P., Nakandala, D., Lee, C.K.: Risk quantification in cold chain management: a federated learning-enabled multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Indus. Manage. Data Syst. (2021)

Levner, E., Ptuskin, A.: An entropy-based approach to identifying vulnerable components in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(22), 6888–6902 (2015)

Lian, J., Zhang, Y., Li, C.J.: An efficient k-shortest paths based routing algorithm. Adv. Mater. Res. 532, 1775–1779 (2012) (Trans Tech Publ)

Liu, C.-L., Lee, M.-Y.: Integration, supply chain resilience, and service performance in third-party logistics providers. Int. J. Logist. Manage. (2018)

Liu, Z., Ming, X.: A methodological framework with rough-entropy-electre tri to classify failure modes for co-implementation of smart pss. Adv. Eng. Inform. 42, 100968 (2019)

Louis, M., Pagell, M.: Categorizing supply chain risks: review, integrated typology and future research. In: Revisiting Supply Chain Risk, pp 329–366. Springer (2019)

Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W., Smith, C.D., Zacharia, Z.G.: Defining supply chain management. J. Bus. Logist. 22(2), 1–25 (2001)

Merad, M., Verdel, T., Roy, B., Kouniali, S.: Use of multi-criteria decision-aids for risk zoning and management of large area subjected to mining-induced hazards. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 19(2), 125–138 (2004)

Merzifonluoglu, Y.: Impact of risk aversion and backup supplier on sourcing decisions of a firm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(22), 6937–6961 (2015)

Mogale, D., Kumar, S.K., Tiwari, M.K.: Green food supply chain design considering risk and post-harvest losses: a case study. Ann. Oper. Res. 295, 257–284 (2020)

Moktadir, M.A., Ali, S.M., Mangla, S.K., Sharmy, T.A., Luthra, S., Mishra, N., Garza-Reyes, J.A.: Decision modeling of risks in pharmaceutical supply chains. Indus. Manage. Data Syst. (2018)

Moktadir, M.A., Dwivedi, A., Khan, N.S., Paul, S.K., Khan, S.A., Ahmed, S., Sultana, R.: Analysis of risk factors in sustainable supply chain management in an emerging economy of leather industry. J. Cleaner Prod. 124641 (2020)

Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Zielniewicz, P.: A user-oriented implementation of the electre-tri method integrating preference elicitation support. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(7–8), 757–777 (2000)

Muhammad, M.N., Cavus, N.: Fuzzy dematel method for identifying lms evaluation criteria. Procedia Comput. Sci. 120, 742–749 (2017)

Mulliner, E., Malys, N., Maliene, V.: Comparative analysis of mcdm methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega 59, 146–156 (2016)

Munir, M., Jajja, M.S.S., Chatha, K.A., Farooq, S.: Supply chain risk management and operational performance: the enabling role of supply chain integration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 227, 107667 (2020)

Mzougui, I., Carpitella, S., Certa, A., Felsoufi, Z.E., Izquierdo, J.: Assessing supply chain risks in the automotive industry through a modified mcdm-based fmeca. Processes 8(5), 579 (2020)

Neiger, D., Rotaru, K., Churilov, L.: Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. J. Oper. Manage. 27(2), 154–168 (2009)

Norrman, A., Jansson, U.: Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. (2004)

Radivojević, G., Gajović, V.: Supply chain risk modeling by ahp and fuzzy ahp methods. J. Risk Res. 17(3), 337–352 (2014)

Raihan, A.S., Ali, S.M., Roy, S., Das, M., Kabir, G., Paul, S.K.: Integrated model for soft drink industry supply chain risk assessment: implications for sustainability in emerging economies. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 1–22 (2021)

Rezaei, S., Ghalehkhondabi, I., Rafiee, M., Zanganeh, S.N., et al.: Supplier selection and order allocation in clsc configuration with various supply strategies under disruption risk. Opsearch 57(3), 908–934 (2020)

Rocha, C., Dias, L.C.: An algorithm for ordinal sorting based on electre with categories defined by examples. J. Global Optim. 42(2), 255–277 (2008)

Rostamzadeh, R., Ghorabaee, M.K., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., Nobar, H.B.K.: Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy topsis-critic approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 175, 651–669 (2018)

Sahu, N.K., Sahu, A.K., Sahu, A.K.: Appraisement and benchmarking of third-party logistic service provider by exploration of risk-based approach. Cogent Bus. Manage. 2(1), 1121637 (2015)

Sahu, N.K., Sahu, A.K., Sahu, A.K.: Fuzzy-ahp: a boon in 3pl decision making process. In: Theoretical and practical advancements for fuzzy system integration, pp. 97–125. IGI Global (2017)

Samvedi, A., Jain, V., Chan, F.T.: Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy ahp and fuzzy topsis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(8), 2433–2442 (2013)

Schoenherr, T., Tummala, V.R., Harrison, T.P.: Assessing supply chain risks with the analytic hierarchy process: providing decision support for the offshoring decision by a us manufacturing company. J. Purchas. Supp. Manage. 14(2), 100–111 (2008)

Smialek, J., Tankersley, J.: Fed makes emergency rate cut, but markets continue tumbling. New York Times (2020)

Sodhi, M.S., Son, B.-G., Tang, C.S.: Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Prod. Oper. Manage. 21(1), 1–13 (2012)

Tang, C., Tomlin, B.: The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 116(1), 12–27 (2008)

Thun, J.-H., Hoenig, D.: An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the german automotive industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 131(1), 242–249 (2011)

Trkman, P., de Oliveira, M.P.V., McCormack, K.: Value-oriented supply chain risk management: you get what you expect. Indus. Manage. Data Syst. (2016)

Uddin, S., Ali, S., Kabir, G., Suhi, S., Enayet, R., Haque, T.: An ahp-electre framework to evaluate barriers to green supply chain management in the leather industry. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 26(8), 732–751 (2019)

Vanalle, R.M., Lucato, Ganga, Filho, W.G., Alves, A.: Risk management in the automotive supply chain: an exploratory study in brazil. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(3), 783–799 (2020)

Vargas, L., De Felice, F., Petrillo, A.: Editorial journal of multicriteria decision analysis special issue on “industrial and manufacturing engineering: theory and application using ahp/anp.” J. Multi Criteria Decis. Anal. 24(5–6), 201–202 (2017)

Wang, H., Gu, T., Jin, M., Zhao, R., Wang, G.: The complexity measurement and evolution analysis of supply chain network under disruption risks. Chaos Solit. Fract. 116, 72–78 (2018)

Wilding, R., Wagner, B., Colicchia, C., Strozzi, F.: Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supp. Chain Manage. Int. J. (2012)

Xie, C., Anumba, C.J., Lee, T.-R., Tummala, R., Schoenherr, T.: Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (scrmp). Supp. Chain Manage. Int. J. (2011)

Yang, J., Xie, H., Yu, G., Liu, M.: Achieving a just-in-time supply chain: the role of supply chain intelligence. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 231, 107878 (2021)

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem