- -

Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies

Show full item record

Vera, P.; Sasa, M.; Encabo, S.; Barba, E.; Belda Perez, EJ.; Monros, J. (2011). Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies. Biodiversity ans Conservation. 20(6):1287-1317. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0028-x

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/34846

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies
Author:
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ciencia Animal - Departament de Ciència Animal
Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Investigación para la Gestión Integral de Zonas Costeras - Institut d'Investigació per a la Gestió Integral de Zones Costaneres
Issued date:
Abstract:
The establishment of protected areas is traditionally considered indispensable to preserve biodiversity hotspots or areas inhabited by threatened species. The analysis of correlations between composition or richness of ...[+]
Subjects: Biodiversity Congruence , Community Assemblages , Composition Correlations , Land Use , Local Management , Richness Correlations
Copyrigths: Cerrado
Source:
Biodiversity ans Conservation. (issn: 0960-3115 )
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-011-0028-x
Publisher:
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0028-x
Thanks:
We would like to thank the Service of Environment of the Local government of Carcaixent for funding and giving all the facilities to develop the field work. We are also very grateful to D. Beneyto, L. Garcia and R. Piculo ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Anand M, Laurence S, Rayfield B (2005) Diversity relationships among taxonomic groups in recovering and restored forests. Conserv Biol 19:955–962

Atauri JA, de Lucio JV (2001) The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol 16:147–159

Azeria ET, Fortin D, Lemaitre J et al (2009) Fine-scale structure and cross-taxon congruence of bird and beetle assemblages in an old-growth boreal forest mosaic. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:333–345 [+]
Anand M, Laurence S, Rayfield B (2005) Diversity relationships among taxonomic groups in recovering and restored forests. Conserv Biol 19:955–962

Atauri JA, de Lucio JV (2001) The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol 16:147–159

Azeria ET, Fortin D, Lemaitre J et al (2009) Fine-scale structure and cross-taxon congruence of bird and beetle assemblages in an old-growth boreal forest mosaic. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:333–345

Baldi A (2003) Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic Appl Ecol 4:589–593

Balmford A (1998) On hotspots and the use of indicators for reserve selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:409

Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D et al (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150

Bini LM, Galli Vieria LC, Machado J, Machado Velho LF (2007) Concordance of species composition patterns among microcrustaceans, rotifers and testate amoebae in a shallow pond. Int Rev Hydrobiol 92:1–22

Blomberg S, Shine R (1996) Reptiles. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Bonnet E, van de Peer Y (2002) ZT: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. J Stat Softw 7:1–12

Cameron SE, Williams KJ, Mitchell DK (2008) Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22:886–896

Castellano S, Balletto E (2002) Is the partial Mantel test inadequate? Evolution 56:1871–1873

Castro-Luna AA, Sosa VJ, Castillo-Campos G (2007) Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south-eastern Mexico. Anim Conserv 10:219–228

Chan EKH, Yu YT, Zhang YX, Dudgeon D (2008) Distribution patterns of birds and insect prey in tropical riparian forest. Biotropica 40(5):623–629

da Silva AP Jr, Mendes AR (2008) The effect of a mega-fragmentation process on large mammal assemblages in the highly-threatened Pernambuco Endemism Centre, north-eastern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 17:1455–1464

Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 268:25–29

Ewers RM, Kapos V, Coomes DA et al (2009) Mapping community change in modified landscapes. Biol Conserv 142:2872–2880

Faith DP (1994) Genetic diversity and taxonomic priorities for conservation. Biol Conserv 68:69–74

Fleishman E, Thomson JR, MacNally R et al (2005) Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. Conserv Biol 19:1125–1137

Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T et al (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33

Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227

Gering J, Crist TO, Veech JA (2003) Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 17:488–499

Gibson DJ (2002) Methods in comparative plant population ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Giraudo AR, Matteucci SD, Alonso J et al (2008) Comparing bird assemblages in large and small fragments of the Atlantic Forest hotspots. Biodivers Conserv 17:1251–1265

Grand J, Buonaccorsi J, Cushman SA et al (2004) A multiscale landscape approach to predicting bird and moth rarity hotspots, in a threatened pitch pine-scrub oak community. Conserv Biol 18:1063–1077

Harris GM, Jenkins GM, Pimm SL (2005) Refining biodiversity conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 19:1957–1968

Hess GR, Bartel RA, Leidner AK et al (2006) Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region. Biol Conserv 132:448–457

Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW et al (eds) (1994) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington

Hobohm C (2003) Characterization and ranking of biodiversity hotspots: centres of species richness and endemism. Biodivers Conserv 12:279–287

Howard PC, Viskanic P, Davenport TRB et al (1998) Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394:472–475

Huber PR, Greco SE, Thorne JH (2010) Spatial scale effects on conservation network design: trade-offs and omissions in regional versus local scale planning. Landscape Ecol 25:683–695

Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M et al (2004) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667–675

Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agrienvironment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969

Langhammer PF, Bakarr MI, Bennun LA et al (2007) Identification and gap analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected area systems. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2004) Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecol Lett 7:81–87

López de Luzuriaga A, Olano JM (2006) Con los pies en el suelo: incluyendo la estructura espacial de los datos en los análisis multivariantes. Ecosistemas 15. http://www.revistaecosistemas.net/articulo.asp?Id=441

Lovell S, Hamer M, Slotow R, Herbert D (2007) Assessment of congruency across invertebrate taxa and taxonomic levels to identify potential surrogates. Biol Conserv 139:113–125

Lumaret JP, Lobo JM (1996) Geographic distribution of endemic dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in the Western Palaearctic region. Biodivers Lett 3:192–199

Lund MP, Rahbek C (2002) Cross-taxon congruence in complementarity and conservation of temperate biodiversity. Anim Conserv 5:163–171

MacNally R, Fleishman E (2004) A successful predictive model of species richness based on indicator species. Conserv Biol 18:646–647

Magurran EM (1983) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Chapman and Hall, London

Mason CF, Macdonald SM (2000) Influence of landscape and land-use on the distribution of breeding birds in farmland in eastern England. J Zool 251:339–348

McKnight MW, White PS, McDonald RI et al (2007) Putting beta-diversity on the map: broad-scale congruence and coincidence in the extremes. Plos Biol 5:e272

Mouillot D, Culioli JM, Pelletier D, Tomasini JA (2008) Do we protect biological originality in protected areas? A new index and an application to the Bonifacio Strait Natural Reserve. Biol Conserv 141:1569–1580

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM (2005) Atlas Climático Digital de la Península Ibérica. Metodología y aplicaciones en bioclimatología y geobotánica, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra

Nogués-Bravo D, Martínez-Rica JP (2004) Factors controlling the spatial species richness pattern of four groups of terrestrial vertebrates in an area between two different biogeographic regions in northern Spain. J Biogeogr 31:629–641

Nordén B, Paltto H, Götmark F, Wallin K (2007) Indicators of biodiversity, what do they indicate?—lessons for conservation of cryptogams in oak-rich forest. Biol Conserv 135:369–379

Oertli S, Müller A, Steiner D et al (2005) Cross-taxon congruence of species diversity and community similarity among three insect taxa in a mosaic landscape. Biol Conserv 126:195–205

Orme CD, Davies RG, Burgess M et al (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019

Ovadia O (2003) Ranking hotspots of varying sizes: a lesson from the nonlinearity of the species-area relationship. Conserv Biol 17:1440–1441

Parris KM, Lindenmayer DB (2004) Evidence that creation of a Pinus radiata plantation in south-eastern Australia has reduced habitat for frogs. Acta Oecol 25:93–101

Paszkowski CA, Tonn WM (2000) Community concordance between the fish and aquatic birds of lakes in northern Alberta, Canada: the relative importance of environmental and biotic factors. Freshw Biol 43:421–437

Peak RG, Thompson FR III (2006) Factors affecting avian species richness and density in riparian areas. J Wildl Manag 70:173–179

Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ, Binns D (1999) Vascular plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and lichen diversity. Conserv Biol 13:282–292

Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH et al (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365:335–337

Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH (1999) The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv Biol 13:484–492

Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2008) Global concordance in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates. Ecol Lett 11:547–553

Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI et al (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643

Sauberer N, Zulka KP, Abensperg-Traun M et al (2004) Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol Conserv 117:181–190

Sebastián-González E, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Botella F (2010) Agricultural ponds as alternative habitat for waterbirds: spatial and temporal patterns of abundance and management strategies. Eur J Wildl Res 56:11–20

Shriner SA, Wilson KR, Flather CH (2006) Reserve networks based on richness hotspots and representation vary with scale. Ecol Appl 16:1660–1673

Soininen J, Paavola R, Kwandrans J, Muotka T (2009) Diatoms: unicellular surrogates for macroalgal community structure in streams? Biodivers Conserv 18:79–89

Stag Electronic (2003) Batscan 8.7. www.batbox.com

StatSoft (2001) STATISTICA: data analysis software system, version 6.0. StatSoft, Oklahoma

Su JC, Debinski DM, Jakubausjas ME, Kindscher K (2004) Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse-filter conservation. Conserv Biol 18:167–173

Sutherland WJ (1996) Mammals. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A et al (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874

Tyre AJ, Tenhumberg T, Field SA et al (2003) Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys by estimating false negative error rates in presence–absence data. Ecol Appl 13:1790–1801

Urbina-Cardona JN, Olivares-Pérez M, Reynoso VH (2006) Herpetofauna diversity and microenvironment correlates across a pasture–edge–interior ecotone in tropical rainforest fragments in the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve of Veracruz, Mexico. Biol Conserv 132:61–75

Vessby K, Söderström B, Glimskär A, Svensson B (2002) Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in Swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv Biol 16:430–439

Vickery JA, Bradbury RB, Henderson IG et al (2004) The role of agrienvironment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England. Biol Conserv 119:19–39

Weaver JC (1994) Indicator species and scale of observation. Conserv Biol 9:939–942

Xu H, Wu J, Liu Y et al (2008) Biodiversity congruence and conservation strategies: a national test. Bioscience 58:632–639

Youssef NH, Elshahed MS (2008) Species richness in soil bacterial communities: a proposed approach to overcome sample size bias. J Microbiol Meth 75:86–91

Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

Zuberogoitia I, Campos FB (1998) Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola 45:47–53

[-]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record