- -

Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: Vera et al 2011 ...
Tamaño: 295.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Vera, P. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Sasa, M. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Encabo, S.I. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Barba, E. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Belda Pérez, Eduardo Jorge es_ES
dc.contributor.author Monros, J.S. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-01-10T09:28:53Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 0960-3115
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/34846
dc.description.abstract The establishment of protected areas is traditionally considered indispensable to preserve biodiversity hotspots or areas inhabited by threatened species. The analysis of correlations between composition or richness of several taxonomic groups in a specific area has emerged as a useful mechanism to quickly identify areas of biological and conservation interest, and is currently used to select and design protected areas. The effect of habitat fragmentation on these correlations at a regional scale has been studied, but the effect of land use on the correlations obtained at local scale is poorly understood. We evaluated the relationships among different taxonomic groups frequently used in biological assessments for reserve design (vascular flora, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals), taking into account the effects of land use on these correlations. We compared richness and species composition of these groups in 1 km(2) quadrants within a total area of 75 km(2) in a low mountain Mediterranean area. Richness and composition were significantly correlated between several groups, both using the complete data set and also analyzing natural and disturbed areas separately. Species composition and species richness correlations were not congruent at the full landscape approach, nor natural and disturbed quadrants. Factors extrinsic to the communities also varied their influence in the assemblage of the community and species richness or not land uses were taken into account. According to our results, natural and human-disturbed areas should not be combined in cross-taxon congruences analysis at local scale. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship We would like to thank the Service of Environment of the Local government of Carcaixent for funding and giving all the facilities to develop the field work. We are also very grateful to D. Beneyto, L. Garcia and R. Piculo for their help in the surveys. We sincerely thank Dr. George R. Hess for his comments and contributions to improve the manuscript. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Biodiversity ans Conservation es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Biodiversity Congruence es_ES
dc.subject Community Assemblages es_ES
dc.subject Composition Correlations es_ES
dc.subject Land Use es_ES
dc.subject Local Management es_ES
dc.subject Richness Correlations es_ES
dc.subject.classification ZOOLOGIA es_ES
dc.title Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.embargo.lift 10000-01-01
dc.embargo.terms forever es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10531-011-0028-x
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ciencia Animal - Departament de Ciència Animal es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Investigación para la Gestión Integral de Zonas Costeras - Institut d'Investigació per a la Gestió Integral de Zones Costaneres es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Vera, P.; Sasa, M.; Encabo, S.; Barba, E.; Belda Perez, EJ.; Monros, J. (2011). Land use and biodiversity congruences at local scale: applications to conservation strategies. Biodiversity ans Conservation. 20(6):1287-1317. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0028-x es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0028-x es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1287 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1317 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 20 es_ES
dc.description.issue 6 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 216304
dc.contributor.funder Ajuntament de Carcaixent es_ES
dc.description.references Anand M, Laurence S, Rayfield B (2005) Diversity relationships among taxonomic groups in recovering and restored forests. Conserv Biol 19:955–962 es_ES
dc.description.references Atauri JA, de Lucio JV (2001) The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol 16:147–159 es_ES
dc.description.references Azeria ET, Fortin D, Lemaitre J et al (2009) Fine-scale structure and cross-taxon congruence of bird and beetle assemblages in an old-growth boreal forest mosaic. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:333–345 es_ES
dc.description.references Baldi A (2003) Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic Appl Ecol 4:589–593 es_ES
dc.description.references Balmford A (1998) On hotspots and the use of indicators for reserve selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:409 es_ES
dc.description.references Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London es_ES
dc.description.references Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D et al (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150 es_ES
dc.description.references Bini LM, Galli Vieria LC, Machado J, Machado Velho LF (2007) Concordance of species composition patterns among microcrustaceans, rotifers and testate amoebae in a shallow pond. Int Rev Hydrobiol 92:1–22 es_ES
dc.description.references Blomberg S, Shine R (1996) Reptiles. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge es_ES
dc.description.references Bonnet E, van de Peer Y (2002) ZT: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. J Stat Softw 7:1–12 es_ES
dc.description.references Cameron SE, Williams KJ, Mitchell DK (2008) Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22:886–896 es_ES
dc.description.references Castellano S, Balletto E (2002) Is the partial Mantel test inadequate? Evolution 56:1871–1873 es_ES
dc.description.references Castro-Luna AA, Sosa VJ, Castillo-Campos G (2007) Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south-eastern Mexico. Anim Conserv 10:219–228 es_ES
dc.description.references Chan EKH, Yu YT, Zhang YX, Dudgeon D (2008) Distribution patterns of birds and insect prey in tropical riparian forest. Biotropica 40(5):623–629 es_ES
dc.description.references da Silva AP Jr, Mendes AR (2008) The effect of a mega-fragmentation process on large mammal assemblages in the highly-threatened Pernambuco Endemism Centre, north-eastern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 17:1455–1464 es_ES
dc.description.references Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 268:25–29 es_ES
dc.description.references Ewers RM, Kapos V, Coomes DA et al (2009) Mapping community change in modified landscapes. Biol Conserv 142:2872–2880 es_ES
dc.description.references Faith DP (1994) Genetic diversity and taxonomic priorities for conservation. Biol Conserv 68:69–74 es_ES
dc.description.references Fleishman E, Thomson JR, MacNally R et al (2005) Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. Conserv Biol 19:1125–1137 es_ES
dc.description.references Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T et al (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33 es_ES
dc.description.references Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227 es_ES
dc.description.references Gering J, Crist TO, Veech JA (2003) Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 17:488–499 es_ES
dc.description.references Gibson DJ (2002) Methods in comparative plant population ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford es_ES
dc.description.references Giraudo AR, Matteucci SD, Alonso J et al (2008) Comparing bird assemblages in large and small fragments of the Atlantic Forest hotspots. Biodivers Conserv 17:1251–1265 es_ES
dc.description.references Grand J, Buonaccorsi J, Cushman SA et al (2004) A multiscale landscape approach to predicting bird and moth rarity hotspots, in a threatened pitch pine-scrub oak community. Conserv Biol 18:1063–1077 es_ES
dc.description.references Harris GM, Jenkins GM, Pimm SL (2005) Refining biodiversity conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 19:1957–1968 es_ES
dc.description.references Hess GR, Bartel RA, Leidner AK et al (2006) Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region. Biol Conserv 132:448–457 es_ES
dc.description.references Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW et al (eds) (1994) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington es_ES
dc.description.references Hobohm C (2003) Characterization and ranking of biodiversity hotspots: centres of species richness and endemism. Biodivers Conserv 12:279–287 es_ES
dc.description.references Howard PC, Viskanic P, Davenport TRB et al (1998) Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394:472–475 es_ES
dc.description.references Huber PR, Greco SE, Thorne JH (2010) Spatial scale effects on conservation network design: trade-offs and omissions in regional versus local scale planning. Landscape Ecol 25:683–695 es_ES
dc.description.references Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M et al (2004) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667–675 es_ES
dc.description.references Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agrienvironment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969 es_ES
dc.description.references Langhammer PF, Bakarr MI, Bennun LA et al (2007) Identification and gap analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected area systems. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland es_ES
dc.description.references Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2004) Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecol Lett 7:81–87 es_ES
dc.description.references López de Luzuriaga A, Olano JM (2006) Con los pies en el suelo: incluyendo la estructura espacial de los datos en los análisis multivariantes. Ecosistemas 15. http://www.revistaecosistemas.net/articulo.asp?Id=441 es_ES
dc.description.references Lovell S, Hamer M, Slotow R, Herbert D (2007) Assessment of congruency across invertebrate taxa and taxonomic levels to identify potential surrogates. Biol Conserv 139:113–125 es_ES
dc.description.references Lumaret JP, Lobo JM (1996) Geographic distribution of endemic dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in the Western Palaearctic region. Biodivers Lett 3:192–199 es_ES
dc.description.references Lund MP, Rahbek C (2002) Cross-taxon congruence in complementarity and conservation of temperate biodiversity. Anim Conserv 5:163–171 es_ES
dc.description.references MacNally R, Fleishman E (2004) A successful predictive model of species richness based on indicator species. Conserv Biol 18:646–647 es_ES
dc.description.references Magurran EM (1983) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Chapman and Hall, London es_ES
dc.description.references Mason CF, Macdonald SM (2000) Influence of landscape and land-use on the distribution of breeding birds in farmland in eastern England. J Zool 251:339–348 es_ES
dc.description.references McKnight MW, White PS, McDonald RI et al (2007) Putting beta-diversity on the map: broad-scale congruence and coincidence in the extremes. Plos Biol 5:e272 es_ES
dc.description.references Mouillot D, Culioli JM, Pelletier D, Tomasini JA (2008) Do we protect biological originality in protected areas? A new index and an application to the Bonifacio Strait Natural Reserve. Biol Conserv 141:1569–1580 es_ES
dc.description.references Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858 es_ES
dc.description.references Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM (2005) Atlas Climático Digital de la Península Ibérica. Metodología y aplicaciones en bioclimatología y geobotánica, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra es_ES
dc.description.references Nogués-Bravo D, Martínez-Rica JP (2004) Factors controlling the spatial species richness pattern of four groups of terrestrial vertebrates in an area between two different biogeographic regions in northern Spain. J Biogeogr 31:629–641 es_ES
dc.description.references Nordén B, Paltto H, Götmark F, Wallin K (2007) Indicators of biodiversity, what do they indicate?—lessons for conservation of cryptogams in oak-rich forest. Biol Conserv 135:369–379 es_ES
dc.description.references Oertli S, Müller A, Steiner D et al (2005) Cross-taxon congruence of species diversity and community similarity among three insect taxa in a mosaic landscape. Biol Conserv 126:195–205 es_ES
dc.description.references Orme CD, Davies RG, Burgess M et al (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019 es_ES
dc.description.references Ovadia O (2003) Ranking hotspots of varying sizes: a lesson from the nonlinearity of the species-area relationship. Conserv Biol 17:1440–1441 es_ES
dc.description.references Parris KM, Lindenmayer DB (2004) Evidence that creation of a Pinus radiata plantation in south-eastern Australia has reduced habitat for frogs. Acta Oecol 25:93–101 es_ES
dc.description.references Paszkowski CA, Tonn WM (2000) Community concordance between the fish and aquatic birds of lakes in northern Alberta, Canada: the relative importance of environmental and biotic factors. Freshw Biol 43:421–437 es_ES
dc.description.references Peak RG, Thompson FR III (2006) Factors affecting avian species richness and density in riparian areas. J Wildl Manag 70:173–179 es_ES
dc.description.references Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ, Binns D (1999) Vascular plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and lichen diversity. Conserv Biol 13:282–292 es_ES
dc.description.references Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH et al (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365:335–337 es_ES
dc.description.references Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH (1999) The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv Biol 13:484–492 es_ES
dc.description.references Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2008) Global concordance in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates. Ecol Lett 11:547–553 es_ES
dc.description.references Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI et al (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643 es_ES
dc.description.references Sauberer N, Zulka KP, Abensperg-Traun M et al (2004) Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol Conserv 117:181–190 es_ES
dc.description.references Sebastián-González E, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Botella F (2010) Agricultural ponds as alternative habitat for waterbirds: spatial and temporal patterns of abundance and management strategies. Eur J Wildl Res 56:11–20 es_ES
dc.description.references Shriner SA, Wilson KR, Flather CH (2006) Reserve networks based on richness hotspots and representation vary with scale. Ecol Appl 16:1660–1673 es_ES
dc.description.references Soininen J, Paavola R, Kwandrans J, Muotka T (2009) Diatoms: unicellular surrogates for macroalgal community structure in streams? Biodivers Conserv 18:79–89 es_ES
dc.description.references Stag Electronic (2003) Batscan 8.7. www.batbox.com es_ES
dc.description.references StatSoft (2001) STATISTICA: data analysis software system, version 6.0. StatSoft, Oklahoma es_ES
dc.description.references Su JC, Debinski DM, Jakubausjas ME, Kindscher K (2004) Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse-filter conservation. Conserv Biol 18:167–173 es_ES
dc.description.references Sutherland WJ (1996) Mammals. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge es_ES
dc.description.references Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A et al (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874 es_ES
dc.description.references Tyre AJ, Tenhumberg T, Field SA et al (2003) Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys by estimating false negative error rates in presence–absence data. Ecol Appl 13:1790–1801 es_ES
dc.description.references Urbina-Cardona JN, Olivares-Pérez M, Reynoso VH (2006) Herpetofauna diversity and microenvironment correlates across a pasture–edge–interior ecotone in tropical rainforest fragments in the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve of Veracruz, Mexico. Biol Conserv 132:61–75 es_ES
dc.description.references Vessby K, Söderström B, Glimskär A, Svensson B (2002) Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in Swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv Biol 16:430–439 es_ES
dc.description.references Vickery JA, Bradbury RB, Henderson IG et al (2004) The role of agrienvironment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England. Biol Conserv 119:19–39 es_ES
dc.description.references Weaver JC (1994) Indicator species and scale of observation. Conserv Biol 9:939–942 es_ES
dc.description.references Xu H, Wu J, Liu Y et al (2008) Biodiversity congruence and conservation strategies: a national test. Bioscience 58:632–639 es_ES
dc.description.references Youssef NH, Elshahed MS (2008) Species richness in soil bacterial communities: a proposed approach to overcome sample size bias. J Microbiol Meth 75:86–91 es_ES
dc.description.references Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey es_ES
dc.description.references Zuberogoitia I, Campos FB (1998) Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola 45:47–53 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem