- -

A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: SET Quest Analysis ...
Tamaño: 218.6Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Martínez;Carot;Ja ...
Tamaño: 289.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Martínez Gómez, Mónica es_ES
dc.contributor.author Carot Sierra, José Miguel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Jabaloyes Vivas, José Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Zarzo Castelló, Manuel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-09-22T07:25:21Z
dc.date.available 2014-09-22T07:25:21Z
dc.date.issued 2011-10
dc.identifier.issn 0033-5177
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/39799
dc.description The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9345-5 es_ES
dc.description.abstract Student evaluation of teaching (SET) questionnaires are the most common methods of evaluation used by European universities to assess the quality of teaching delivered by their lecturers. A series of multivariate statistical methods were applied to analyze the underlying structure of the SET questionnaire used by the Universidad Politecnica de Valencia (UPV) in order to develop an appropriate methodology for extracting, analyzing, and interpreting the information contained in the questionnaire. In a first step, a confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) was developed in order to evaluate the reliability, validity and dimensionality of it, by means of two relatively new parameters commonly used in structural equation modelling: the compound reliability and extracted variance for each latent construct. In a second step, cluster analysis (CA) was used to test the ability of the questionnaire for the identification of different categories of lecturers. In the last step, a tree classification method, the chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID), was used in order to characterize the different lecturer's categories obtained with CA according to all available information regarding the teaching staff and subjects. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Quality and Quantity es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject CHAID es_ES
dc.subject Cluster analysis es_ES
dc.subject Confirmatory factor analysis es_ES
dc.subject Quality indicator es_ES
dc.subject Student questionnaire for teaching assessment es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.title A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11135-010-9345-5
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Martínez Gómez, M.; Carot Sierra, JM.; Jabaloyes Vivas, JM.; Zarzo Castelló, M. (2011). A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study. Quality and Quantity. 45(6):1415-1427. doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9345-5 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11135-010-9345-5 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1415 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1427 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 45 es_ES
dc.description.issue 6 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 205565
dc.description.references Batista, J.M., Coenders, G. (eds): Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. Cuadernos de estadística, 6. La Muralla, Madrid (2000) es_ES
dc.description.references Batista J.M., Coenders G., Alonso J.: Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. Su utilidad en validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med. Clin. (Barc.) 122(1), 21–27 (2004) es_ES
dc.description.references Bentler P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107(2), 238–246 (1990) es_ES
dc.description.references Bentler P.M., Bonett D.G.: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588–606 (1980) es_ES
dc.description.references Berk R.A.: Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 17, 48–62 (2005) es_ES
dc.description.references Bollen, K.A. (eds): Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989) es_ES
dc.description.references Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds): Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury Park (1993) es_ES
dc.description.references Brown M.W., Cudeck R.: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 136–162. Sage, Newbury Park (1993) es_ES
dc.description.references Cajide J.: Análisis factorial confirmatorio de las características de calidad docente universitaria (solución LISREL). Bordón 46(4), 389–405 (1994) es_ES
dc.description.references Campbell D.T., Fiske D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56(2), 81–105 (1959) es_ES
dc.description.references Cashin W.E.: Concerns about using student ratings in community colleges. N. Dir. Community Coll. 11(1), 57–65 (1983) es_ES
dc.description.references Chiu, T., Fang, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Jeris, C.: A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. In: Proceedings of Seventh ACM SIGKDD, International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, 2001 es_ES
dc.description.references Feldman K.A.: The significance of circumstances for college student’s ratings of their teachers and courses. Res. High. Educ. 10, 149–172 (1979) es_ES
dc.description.references Göb R., McCollin C., Fernanda Ramalhoto M.: Ordinal methodology in the analysis of likert scales. Qual. Quant. 41, 601–626 (2007) es_ES
dc.description.references González Such, J.: Estudio de un Instrumento para la Evaluación del Profesorado Universitario. Thesis, Universitat de València, Valencia (1997) es_ES
dc.description.references Gursoy D., Umbreit W.T.: Exploring student’s evaluations of teaching effectiveness: what factors are important? J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 29(1), 91–109 (2005) es_ES
dc.description.references Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C. (eds): Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall International, New York (1995) es_ES
dc.description.references Hu L., Bentler P.M.: Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance. Structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999) es_ES
dc.description.references Jackson D., Teal C.R., Raines J.S., Nansel T.R., Force R.C., Burdsal C.A.: The dimensions of students’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 59(4), 580–596 (1999) es_ES
dc.description.references Jöreskog K.G.: Testing structural equation models. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 294–316. Sage, Newbury Park (1993) es_ES
dc.description.references Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (eds): LISREl V. Analysis of Linear Structural Relations by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. SPSS Publications, Chicago (1981) es_ES
dc.description.references Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (eds): LISREL VI. Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variable, and Least Squares Methods. Scientific Software, Moresville (1986) es_ES
dc.description.references Kass G.V.: An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl. Stat. 29(2), 119–127 (1980) es_ES
dc.description.references Lalla M., Facchinetti G., Maestroleo G.: Ordinal scales and fuzzy set systems to measure agreement: an application to the evaluation of teaching activity. Qual. Quant. 38, 577–601 (2004) es_ES
dc.description.references Marsh H.W.: Validity of students’ evaluations of college teaching: a multitrait multimethod analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 74(2), 219–237 (1982) es_ES
dc.description.references Marsh H.W.: Students’ evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. J. Educ. Psychol. 76(5), 707–754 (1984) es_ES
dc.description.references Marsh H.W.: Students’ evaluations of university teaching: research, findings, methodological issues and directions for future research. J. Educ. Res. 11(3), 253–388 (1987) es_ES
dc.description.references Marsh H.W.: Weighting for the right criteria in the Instructional Development and Effectiveness Assessment (IDEA) system: global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. J. Educ. Psychol. 86, 631–648 (1994) es_ES
dc.description.references Marsh H.W., Hattie J.: The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. J. High. Educ. 73, 603–641 (2002) es_ES
dc.description.references Mulaik S.A., James L.R., Van Alstine J., Bennett N., Lind S., Stilwell C.D.: Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol. Bull. 105(3), 430–445 (1989) es_ES
dc.description.references Rodríguez Sabiote, C., Gutiérrez Pérez, J.: Debilidades de la evaluación de la calidad en la universidad española. Causas, consecuencias y propuestas de mejora. Revista Electron. de Investig. Educ. 5(1) (2003). http://redie.ens.uabc.mx/vol5no1/contenido-sabiote.html . Retrieved 20 April 2005 es_ES
dc.description.references Ting K.F.: A multilevel perspective on student ratings of instruction: lessons from the Chinese experience. Res. High. Educ. 41, 637–661 (2000) es_ES
dc.description.references Toland M.D., De Ayala R.J.: A multilevel factor analysis of student’s evaluations of teaching. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 65(2), 272–296 (2005) es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem