- -

Architects and non-architects: differences in perception of property design

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Architects and non-architects: differences in perception of property design

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Montañana I Aviñó, A.; Llinares Millán, MDC.; Navarro Astor, E. (2013). Architects and non-architects: differences in perception of property design. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 28(2):273-291. doi:10.1007/s10901-012-9312-7

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/43620

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Architects and non-architects: differences in perception of property design
Autor: Montañana i Aviñó, Antoni Llinares Millán, María del Carmen Navarro Astor, Elena
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
This study is an analysis of the perceptions of experts and non-experts in the building industry concerning a series of real estate promotions in the city of Valencia (Spain). Differential semantics were used to obtain a ...[+]
Palabras clave: Differences in perception , Differential semantics , Residential choice
Derechos de uso: Cerrado
Fuente:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. (issn: 1566-4910 )
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-012-9312-7
Editorial:
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9312-7
Tipo: Artículo

References

Akalin, A., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C., & Kilicoglu, O. (2009). Architecture and engineering students’ evaluations of house façades: Preferences, complexity and impressiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 124–132.

Basilevsky, A. (1994). Statistical factor analysis and related methods: Theory and applications. New York: Wiley.

Bisantz, A. M., Kirlik, A., Gay, P., Phipps, D. A., Walker, N., & Fisk, A. D. (2000). Modeling and analysis of a dynamic judgment task using a lens model approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(6), 605–616. [+]
Akalin, A., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C., & Kilicoglu, O. (2009). Architecture and engineering students’ evaluations of house façades: Preferences, complexity and impressiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 124–132.

Basilevsky, A. (1994). Statistical factor analysis and related methods: Theory and applications. New York: Wiley.

Bisantz, A. M., Kirlik, A., Gay, P., Phipps, D. A., Walker, N., & Fisk, A. D. (2000). Modeling and analysis of a dynamic judgment task using a lens model approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(6), 605–616.

Brown, G., & Gifford, R. (2001). Architects predict lay evaluations of large contemporary buildings: Whose conceptual properties? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 93–99.

Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkley: University of California Press.

Clark, W. A. V. (1982). Modelling Housing Market Research. London: Croom Helm.

Clark, W. A. V. (1986). Human migration. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Clark, W. A. V. (1993). Search and choice in urban housing markets. In T. Gärling & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Behavior and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches (pp. 298–316). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C., & Dieleman, F. M. (2006). Residential mobility and neighbourhood outcomes. Housing Studies, 21(3), 323–342.

Devlin, K. (1990). An examination of architectural interpretation: Architects versus Nonarchitects. In B. C. Scheer & W. F. E. Preiser (Eds.), Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic control. New York: Chapman and Hall.

Devlin, K., & Nasar, J. L. (1989). The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of “high” versus “popular” residential architecture and public versus architecture judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 333–344.

Dieleman, F. M., & Mulder, C. H. (2002). The geography of residential choice. In J. I. Aragonés, G. Francescato, & T. Gärling (Eds.), Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction and behavior (pp. 35–54). London, CT: Bergin and Garvey, Westport.

Dinç, P. (2009). Gender (in)difference in private offices: A holistic approach for assessing satisfaction and personalization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 53–62.

Douglas, D., & Gifford, R. (2001). Evaluation of the physical classroom by students and professors: A lens model approach. Educational Research, 43(3), 295–309.

Flury, B. (1988). Common principal components and related multivariate models. New York: Wiley.

Gans, H. (1978). Toward a human architecture: A sociologist view of the profession. Journal of Architectural Education, 2, 26–31.

Gärling, T., & Friman, M. (2002). A psychological approach to the study of residential choice and satisfaction. In J. I. Aragonés, G. Francescato, & T. Gärling (Eds.), Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction and behavior (pp. 55–80). London, CT: Bergin and Garvey, Westport.

Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., Reynolds, D. R., & Shaw, K. T. (2000). Decoding modern architecture. A lens model approach for understanding the aesthetic differences of architects and laypersons. Environment and Behavior, 32, 163–187.

Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., & Shaw, K. T. (2002). Why architects and laypersons judge buildings differently: Cognitive properties and physical bases. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19(2), 131–148.

Groat, L. (1982). Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 3–22.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, International, Inc.

Heald, J. E. (1991). Social judgment theory: Applications to educational decision making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 343–357.

Hershberger, R. G. (1969). A study of meaning and architecture. In J. L. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must be quality. The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14, 39–48.

Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Bizot, E. (1988). Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 24–27.

Llinares, C., & Page, A. F. (2007). Application of product differential semantics to quantify purchaser perceptions in housing assessment. Building and Environment, 42, 2488–2497.

Llinares, C., & Page, A. F. (2011). Kano’s model in Kansei Engineering to evaluate subjective real estate consumer preferences. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41, 233–246.

Llinares, C., Montañana, A., & Navarro, E. (2011). Differences in architects and nonarchitects’ perception of urban design: An application of Kansei Engineering Techniques. Urban Studies Research, 2011, 13. Article ID 736307. doi: 10.1155/2011/736307 .

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mulder, C. H. (1996). Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11(3), 209–232.

Nasar, J. L. (1989). Symbolic meanings of house styles. Environment and Behavior, 21, 235–257.

Ochieng, E. G., & Price, A. D. (2009). Framework for managing multicultural project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16(6), 527–543.

Osgood, C. E., Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1957). The effect of street trees on perceived values of residential property. Environment and Behavior, 24, 298–325.

Purcell, A. T., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Experiencing other people’s houses: A model of similarities and differences in environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 199–212.

Rothrock, L., & Kirlik, A. (2003). Inferring rule-based strategies in dynamic judgment tasks: Towards a non compensatory formulation of the lens model. IEEE Transactions on Systems Management and Cybernetics, 33, 58–72.

Seong, Y., & Nam, C. S. (2008). Capturing judgment policy on customers’ creditworthiness: A lens model and SDT approach. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38, 593–600.

Stewart, T. R., Heideman, K. F., Moniger, W. R., & Reagan-Cirincione, P. (1992). Effects of improved information on the components of skill in weather forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(2), 107–134.

Smits, A., & Mulder, C. H. (2008). Family dynamics and first-time homeownership. Housing Studies, 23(6), 917–933.

Wigton, R. S. (1988). Use of linear models to analyze physicians’ decisions. Medical Decision Making, 8, 241–252.

Wyatt, R. (2004). The great divide: Differences in style between architects and urban planners. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 21, 38–54.

Yildirim, K., & Akalin, A. (2009). Problems related to the dimensions of curved areas in the main living rooms of apartment housing. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 26(1), 70–87.

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem