- -

Detection and correction of linguistic errors: results according to linguistic preferences and uses

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Detection and correction of linguistic errors: results according to linguistic preferences and uses

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Cicres Bosch, Jordi es_ES
dc.contributor.author Llach, Silvia es_ES
dc.contributor.author de-Ribot, María Dolors es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-11-26T09:07:59Z
dc.date.available 2014-11-26T09:07:59Z
dc.date.issued 2014-07-01
dc.identifier.issn 1886-2438
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/44857
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper examines the ability of 256 university students to detect and correct errors related to different linguistic aspects of Catalan, by means of a test including correct and incorrect sentences. The sentences included aspects of Catalan prescriptive grammar, errors caused by interference from Spanish, and discursive aspects (adequacy, coherence and cohesion). In addition to that, the ability of the students has also been linked to data from their language use and linguistic experience in the following areas: language spoken in the family, language spoken with friends, and formal and informal languages of preference. The results show that students whose preferred language is Spanish or either Spanish or Catalan are less competent than those using Catalan on a regular basis. Taking into account the type of error, students who use preferably Spanish or both languages show significantly worse results in the error detection task (in sentences containing grammar and interference errors) than those who prefer Catalan. In contrast, no significant differences are shown regarding discourse errors when the students' linguistic use is considered. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Error detection es_ES
dc.subject Error correction es_ES
dc.subject Catalan norm es_ES
dc.subject Linguistic interference es_ES
dc.subject Linguistic use es_ES
dc.title Detection and correction of linguistic errors: results according to linguistic preferences and uses es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2014-11-26T08:32:57Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/rlyla.2014.1507
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Cicres Bosch, J.; Llach, S.; De-Ribot, MD. (2014). Detection and correction of linguistic errors: results according to linguistic preferences and uses. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 9:14-22. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2014.1507 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2014.1507 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 14 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 22 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 9
dc.identifier.eissn 1886-6298
dc.description.references Amadeo, I. and Solé, J. (1996). Curs pràctic de redacció. Barcelona: Ed. Columna. es_ES
dc.description.references Arnau, J. (2004). "Sobre les competències en català i castellà dels escolars de Catalunya: una resposta a la polèmica sobre el decret d'hores de castellà", Llengua, Societat i Comunicació 1, 1-7. es_ES
dc.description.references Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale (N.J.): Erlbaum. es_ES
dc.description.references Chanquoy, L. (1997). "Thinking skills and composing: Examples of text revision", in J. H. M. Hamers and M. Overtoom (ed.) Inventory of European Programmes for teaching thinking, Utrecht: Sardes, 179-185. es_ES
dc.description.references Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford Applied Linguistics. es_ES
dc.description.references Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Flower, L. and Hayes, J. R. (1980). "The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints", in L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (ed.), Cognitive processes in writing, Hillsdale: N.J. Erlbaum, 31-50. es_ES
dc.description.references García, J. N. and O. Arias-Gundín (2004). "Intervención en estrategias de revisión del mensaje escrito", Psicothema 16 (2), 194-202. es_ES
dc.description.references MEC (2010). PISA 2009. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos. OCDE. Informe espa-ol. Madrid: Instituto de Evaluación. Ministerio de Educación. es_ES
dc.description.references MEC (2007). PISA 2006. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos. OCDE. Informe espa-ol. Madrid: Instituto de Evaluación. Ministerio de Educación. es_ES
dc.description.references Mestres, J. M., Costa, J., Oliva, M. and Fité, R. (2007). Manual d'estil. La redacció i l'edició de textos. 3rd edition. Vic: Eumo. es_ES
dc.description.references Pérez, S. A. (2001). "Revising During Writing in a Second Grade Classroom", Educational Research Quarterly 25 (1), 27-32. es_ES
dc.description.references Van der Pool, E. (1996). "A text-analytical study of conceptual writing processes and their development", in G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van der Bergh and M. Couzijn (ed.) Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 456-472. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem