- -

Evaluating fund performance by compromise programming with linear-quadratic composite metric: an actual case of the CaixaBank in Spain

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Evaluating fund performance by compromise programming with linear-quadratic composite metric: an actual case of the CaixaBank in Spain

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Bravo Sellés, Milagros es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ballestero Pareja, Enrique es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pla Santamaría, David es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-24T18:26:22Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-24T18:26:22Z
dc.date.issued 2012-09
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/48248
dc.description.abstract This paper proposes an additive measure on the basis of compromise programming to evaluate fund performance from multiple criteria, of which the most usual are profitability and risk. This proposal is motivated by the fact that compromise programming is a sound decision support model to obtain scores of alternatives by minimizing weighted distances to an ideal point, the weights reflecting the investor’s preferences for the criteria. To define the distance objective function, the linear-quadratic composite metric is used, which combines advantages of linear and non-linear objective functions. A critical advantage of compromise programming for fund performance evaluation is that the model can be extended to more than two financial criteria while other measures currently used (either ratio-based or leverage-based measures) only consider two criteria, say, profitability and risk. In the application, three investor’s profiles are defined, which involve different weighting systems and lead to different fund rankings. These rankings are compared with domination relationships, the latter formulating if a fund is dominated or non-dominated by convex combinations of other funds. Numerical tables are provided with data, computational process and results, which are analysed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Wiley-Blackwell es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Fund Performance
dc.subject Compromise programming
dc.subject Additive measures
dc.subject Ranking
dc.subject Domination
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA APLICADA es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDAD es_ES
dc.title Evaluating fund performance by compromise programming with linear-quadratic composite metric: an actual case of the CaixaBank in Spain es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/MCDA.1474
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Bravo Selles, M.; Ballestero Pareja, E.; Pla Santamaría, D. (2012). Evaluating fund performance by compromise programming with linear-quadratic composite metric: an actual case of the CaixaBank in Spain. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 19(5-6):247-255. doi:10.1002/MCDA.1474 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1474/abstract es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 247 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 255 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 19 es_ES
dc.description.issue 5-6 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 237635
dc.identifier.eissn 1099-1360
dc.description.references Abdelaziz, F. B., El Fayedh, R., & Rao, A. (2009). A Discrete Stochastic Goal Program for Portfolio Selection: The Case of United Arab Emirates Equity Market. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 47(1), 5-13. doi:10.3138/infor.47.1.5 es_ES
dc.description.references Amiri, M., Ekhtiari, M., & Yazdani, M. (2011). Nadir compromise programming: A model for optimization of multi-objective portfolio problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7222-7226. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.061 es_ES
dc.description.references Aouni, B., Ben Abdelaziz, F., & Martel, J.-M. (2005). Decision-maker’s preferences modeling in the stochastic goal programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 162(3), 610-618. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.035 es_ES
dc.description.references Arenas Parra, M., Bilbao Terol, A., & Rodrı́guez Urı́a, M. V. (2001). A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2), 287-297. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00298-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E. (1997). Selecting the CP metric: A risk aversion approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 97(3), 593-596. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(96)00238-x es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E. (2001). Stochastic goal programming: A mean–variance approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(3), 476-481. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00084-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E. (2005). Mean‐Semivariance Efficient Frontier: A Downside Risk Model for Portfolio Selection. Applied Mathematical Finance, 12(1), 1-15. doi:10.1080/1350486042000254015 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E. (2007). Compromise programming: A utility-based linear-quadratic composite metric from the trade-off between achievement and balanced (non-corner) solutions. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(3), 1369-1382. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.049 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E., Bravo, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M., & Plà-Santamaria, D. (2012). Socially Responsible Investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 487-494. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M., & Bilbao-Terol, A. (2009). Selecting Portfolios Given Multiple Eurostoxx-Based Uncertainty Scenarios: A Stochastic Goal Programming Approach from Fuzzy Betas. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 47(1), 59-70. doi:10.3138/infor.47.1.59 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E., & Pla-Santamaria, D. (2003). Portfolio selection on the Madrid Exchange: a compromise programming model. International Transactions in Operational Research, 10(1), 33-51. doi:10.1111/1475-3995.00391 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E., & Pla-Santamaria, D. (2004). Selecting portfolios for mutual funds. Omega, 32(5), 385-394. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.02.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Ballestero, E., & Pla-Santamaria, D. (2005). Grading the performance of market indicators with utility benchmarks selected from Footsie: a 2000 case study. Applied Economics, 37(18), 2147-2160. doi:10.1080/00036840500278053 es_ES
dc.description.references Abdelaziz, F. B., Aouni, B., & Fayedh, R. E. (2007). Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1811-1823. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.021 es_ES
dc.description.references Ben Abdelaziz, F., & Masri, H. (2005). Stochastic programming with fuzzy linear partial information on probability distribution. European Journal of Operational Research, 162(3), 619-629. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.049 es_ES
dc.description.references Bilbao, A., Arenas, M., Jiménez, M., Perez Gladish, B., & Rodríguez, M. V. (2006). An extension of Sharpe’s single-index model: portfolio selection with expert betas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(12), 1442-1451. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602133 es_ES
dc.description.references Bilbao-Terol, A., Pérez-Gladish, B., & Antomil-lbias, J. (2006). Selecting the optimum portfolio using fuzzy compromise programming and Sharpe’s single-index model. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 182(1), 644-664. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.04.028 es_ES
dc.description.references Bilbao-Terol, A., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M., & Rodríguez-Uría, M. V. (2006). Fuzzy compromise programming for portfolio selection. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173(1), 251-264. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Bravo, M., Pla-Santamaria, D., & Garcia-Bernabeu, A. (2010). Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 17(5-6), 155-166. doi:10.1002/mcda.460 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, C. R., & Huang, Y. (2011). Mutual Fund Governance and Performance: A Quantile Regression Analysis of Morningstar’s Stewardship Grade. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 311-333. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00858.x es_ES
dc.description.references Glawischnig, M., & Sommersguter-Reichmann, M. (2010). Assessing the performance of alternative investments using non-parametric efficiency measurement approaches: Is it convincing? Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(2), 295-303. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.07.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (1997). Grading the Performance of Market-Timing Newsletters. Financial Analysts Journal, 53(6), 54-66. doi:10.2469/faj.v53.n6.2130 es_ES
dc.description.references Haslem, J. A., & Scheraga, C. A. (2006). Data Envelopment Analysis of Morningstar’s Small-Cap Mutual Funds. The Journal of Investing, 15(1), 87-92. doi:10.3905/joi.2006.616858 es_ES
dc.description.references Huang, J.-J., Tzeng, G.-H., & Ong, C.-S. (2006). A novel algorithm for uncertain portfolio selection. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173(1), 350-359. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.074 es_ES
dc.description.references Jensen, M. C. (1968). THE PERFORMANCE OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN THE PERIOD 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00815.x es_ES
dc.description.references Kerstens, K., Mounir, A., & de Woestyne, I. V. (2011). Non-parametric frontier estimates of mutual fund performance using C- and L-moments: Some specification tests. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(5), 1190-1201. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.030 es_ES
dc.description.references Lin, C.-M., Huang, J.-J., Gen, M., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2006). Recurrent neural network for dynamic portfolio selection. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 175(2), 1139-1146. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.08.031 es_ES
dc.description.references Mahoney, P. G. (2004). Manager-Investor Conflicts in Mutual Funds. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 161-182. doi:10.1257/0895330041371231 es_ES
dc.description.references Ong, C.-S., Jih-Jeng Huang, & Tzeng, G.-H. (2005). A novel hybrid model for portfolio selection. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 169(2), 1195-1210. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2004.10.080 es_ES
dc.description.references Pendaraki, K., Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2004). Towards a goal programming methodology for constructing equity mutual fund portfolios. Journal of Asset Management, 4(6), 415-428. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240120 es_ES
dc.description.references PEREZGLADISH, B., JONES, D., TAMIZ, M., & BILBAOTEROL, A. (2007). An interactive three-stage model for mutual funds portfolio selection☆. Omega, 35(1), 75-88. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.04.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Business, 39(S1), 119. doi:10.1086/294846 es_ES
dc.description.references Steuer, R. E., Qi, Y., & Hirschberger, M. (2006). Suitable-portfolio investors, nondominated frontier sensitivity, and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research, 152(1), 297-317. doi:10.1007/s10479-006-0137-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Yu, P.-L. (1985). Multiple-Criteria Decision Making. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8395-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Zopounidis, C., Despotis, D. K., & Stavropoulou, E. (1995). Multiattribute evaluation of greek banking performance. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 11(1), 97-107. doi:10.1002/asm.3150110110 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem