Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Vidal Puig, Santiago | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Ferrer, Alberto | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-26T12:13:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-26T12:13:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0361-0918 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/50782 | |
dc.description.abstract | Different methodologies for fault diagnosis in multivariate quality control have been proposed in recent years. These methods work in the space of the original measured variables and have performed reasonably well when there is a reduced number of mildly correlated quality and/or process variables with a well-conditioned covariance matrix. These approaches have been introduced by emphasizing their positive or negative virtues, generally on an individual basis, so it is not clear for the practitioner the best method to be used. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the performance of diverse methodological approaches when tested on a large number of distinct simulated scenarios. Our primary aim is to highlight key weaknesses and strengths in these methods as well as clarifying their relationships and the requirements for their implementation in practice. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Fault Diagnosis, | es_ES |
dc.subject | Hotelling's T2 | es_ES |
dc.subject | Multivariate quality control | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA | es_ES |
dc.title | A Comparative Study of Different Methodologies for Fault Diagnosis in Multivariate Quality Control | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/03610918.2012.720745 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Vidal Puig, S.; Ferrer, A. (2014). A Comparative Study of Different Methodologies for Fault Diagnosis in Multivariate Quality Control. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. 43(5):986-1005. doi:10.1080/03610918.2012.720745 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2012.720745 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 986 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 1005 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 43 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 5 | es_ES |
dc.relation.senia | 251043 | |
dc.description.references | Arteaga, F., & Ferrer, A. (2010). How to simulate normal data sets with the desired correlation structure. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 101(1), 38-42. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.12.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Doganaksoy, N., Faltin, F. W., & Tucker, W. T. (1991). Identification of out of control quality characteristics in a multivariate manufacturing environment. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 20(9), 2775-2790. doi:10.1080/03610929108830667 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fuchs, C., & Benjamini, Y. (1994). Multivariate Profile Charts for Statistical Process Control. Technometrics, 36(2), 182-195. doi:10.1080/00401706.1994.10485765 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hawkins, D. M. (1991). Multivariate Quality Control Based on Regression-Adiusted Variables. Technometrics, 33(1), 61-75. doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484770 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Editorial Board. (2007). Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(8), iii-v. doi:10.1016/s0167-9473(07)00125-9 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hayter, A. J., & Tsui, K.-L. (1994). Identification and Quantification in Multivariate Quality Control Problems. Journal of Quality Technology, 26(3), 197-208. doi:10.1080/00224065.1994.11979526 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | HOCHBERG, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800-802. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | HOMMEL, G. (1988). A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika, 75(2), 383-386. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.383 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kourti, T., & MacGregor, J. F. (1996). Multivariate SPC Methods for Process and Product Monitoring. Journal of Quality Technology, 28(4), 409-428. doi:10.1080/00224065.1996.11979699 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Li, J., Jin, J., & Shi, J. (2008). Causation-BasedT2Decomposition for Multivariate Process Monitoring and Diagnosis. Journal of Quality Technology, 40(1), 46-58. doi:10.1080/00224065.2008.11917712 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mason, R. L., Tracy, N. D., & Young, J. C. (1995). Decomposition ofT2 for Multivariate Control Chart Interpretation. Journal of Quality Technology, 27(2), 99-108. doi:10.1080/00224065.1995.11979573 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mason, R. L., Tracy, N. D., & Young, J. C. (1997). A Practical Approach for Interpreting Multivariate T2 Control Chart Signals. Journal of Quality Technology, 29(4), 396-406. doi:10.1080/00224065.1997.11979791 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Murphy, B. J. (1987). Selecting Out of Control Variables With the T 2 Multivariate Quality Control Procedure. The Statistician, 36(5), 571. doi:10.2307/2348668 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rencher, A. C. (1993). The Contribution of Individual Variables to Hotelling’s T 2 , Wilks’ Λ, and R 2. Biometrics, 49(2), 479. doi:10.2307/2532560 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Roy, J. (1958). Step-Down Procedure in Multivariate Analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(4), 1177-1187. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706449 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Runger, G. C., Alt, F. B., & Montgomery, D. C. (1996). Contributors to a multivariate statistical process control chart signal. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 25(10), 2203-2213. doi:10.1080/03610929608831832 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sankoh, A. J., Huque, M. F., & Dubey, S. D. (1997). Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 16(22), 2529-2542. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971130)16:22<2529::aid-sim692>3.0.co;2-j | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tukey, J. W., Ciminera, J. L., & Heyse, J. F. (1985). Testing the Statistical Certainty of a Response to Increasing Doses of a Drug. Biometrics, 41(1), 295. doi:10.2307/2530666 | es_ES |