- -

Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Jorge Curiel-Espa ...
Tamaño: 636.7Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Curiel-Esparza, Jorge es_ES
dc.contributor.author Cuenca-Ruiz, Marco Antonio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Martín Utrillas, Manuel Guzmán es_ES
dc.contributor.author Cantó Perelló, Julián es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-05T09:36:39Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-05T09:36:39Z
dc.date.issued 2014 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 2073-4441 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/57062
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper presents an application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) by integrating a Delphi process for selecting the best sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects. The proposed methodology provides project managers a tool to evaluate problems with multiple criteria and multiple alternatives which involve non-commeasurable decision criteria, with expert opinions playing a major role in the selection of these treatment technologies. Five disinfection techniques for wastewater reuse have been evaluated for each of the nine criteria weighted according to the opinions of consulted experts. Finally, the VIKOR method has been applied to determine a compromise solution, and to establish the stability of the results. Therefore, the expert system proposed to select the optimal disinfection alternative is a hybrid method combining the AHP with the Delphi method and the VIKOR technique, which is shown to be appropriate in realistic scenarios where multiple stakeholders are involved in the selection of a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Water es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Wastewater reuse es_ES
dc.subject Disinfection technologies es_ES
dc.subject Expert systems es_ES
dc.subject AHP-Delphi es_ES
dc.subject VIKOR es_ES
dc.subject Multicriteria decision making es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA DE LA CONSTRUCCION es_ES
dc.subject.classification FISICA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/w6092732 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Física Aplicada - Departament de Física Aplicada es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil - Departament d'Enginyeria de la Construcció i de Projectes d'Enginyeria Civil es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Curiel-Esparza, J.; Cuenca-Ruiz, MA.; Martín Utrillas, MG.; Cantó Perelló, J. (2014). Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects. Water. 6(9):2732-2747. doi:10.3390/w6092732 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.3390/w6092732
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2732 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2747 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 6 es_ES
dc.description.issue 9 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 269344 es_ES
dc.description.references Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for the Community Action in the Field of Water Policy http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0060:EN:NOT es_ES
dc.description.references Scholz, M. (2013). Sustainable Water Systems. Water, 5(1), 239-242. doi:10.3390/w5010239 es_ES
dc.description.references Lazarova, V., Sturny, V., & Sang, G. T. (2012). Relevance and Benefits of Urban Water Reuse in Tourist Areas. Water, 4(1), 107-122. doi:10.3390/w4010107 es_ES
dc.description.references Gómez-López, M. D., Bayo, J., García-Cascales, M. S., & Angosto, J. M. (2009). Decision support in disinfection technologies for treated wastewater reuse. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1504-1511. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.06.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Hunt, D., & Rogers, C. (2014). A Benchmarking System for Domestic Water Use. Sustainability, 6(5), 2993-3018. doi:10.3390/su6052993 es_ES
dc.description.references Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2012). Understanding the major drivers for implementation of municipal sustainable policies in underground space. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(6), 506-514. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.732973 es_ES
dc.description.references Singhirunnusorn, W., & Stenstrom, M. K. (2009). Appropriate wastewater treatment systems for developing countries: criteria and indictor assessment in Thailand. Water Science and Technology, 59(9), 1873-1884. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.215 es_ES
dc.description.references Kildienė, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2014). COMPLEX ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 20(2), 280-290. doi:10.3846/13923730.2014.904813 es_ES
dc.description.references Curiel-Esparza, J., Canto-Perello, J., & Calvo, M. A. (2004). Establishing sustainable strategies in urban underground engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(3), 523-530. doi:10.1007/s11948-004-0009-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang, R., Zhang, X., Yang, J., & Yuan, H. (2013). Wetland ecosystem stability evaluation by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach in Yinchuan Plain, China. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(3-4), 366-374. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2012.06.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Anagnostopoulos, K., & Vavatsikos, A. (2012). Site Suitability Analysis for Natural Systems for Wastewater Treatment with Spatial Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(2), 125-134. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000155 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, Y., Chung, E.-S., Jun, S.-M., & Kim, S. U. (2013). Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater instream use in an urban watershed using fuzzy TOPSIS. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73, 23-32. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Fontana, M. E., & Morais, D. C. (2013). Using Promethee V to Select Alternatives so as to Rehabilitate Water Supply Network with Detected Leaks. Water Resources Management, 27(11), 4021-4037. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0393-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Pophali, G. R., Chelani, A. B., & Dhodapkar, R. S. (2011). Optimal selection of full scale tannery effluent treatment alternative using integrated AHP and GRA approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 10889-10895. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.129 es_ES
dc.description.references Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., & Asolekar, S. R. (2013). The influence of expert opinions on the selection of wastewater treatment alternatives: A group decision-making approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 844-851. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.034 es_ES
dc.description.references Jing, L., Chen, B., Zhang, B., & Li, P. (2013). A Hybrid Stochastic-Interval Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritizing the Strategies of Reusing Treated Wastewater. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2013/874805 es_ES
dc.description.references Zeng, G., Jiang, R., Huang, G., Xu, M., & Li, J. (2007). Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2), 250-259. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.024 es_ES
dc.description.references Sadeghi, N., Fayek, A. R., & Pedrycz, W. (2010). Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation and Risk Assessment in Construction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25(4), 238-252. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00632.x es_ES
dc.description.references Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2013). Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13(2), 276-285. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Oliveira, S. M. A. C., & von Sperling, M. (2007). Reliability analysis of stabilisation pond systems. Water Science and Technology, 55(11), 127-134. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.343 es_ES
dc.description.references Karimi, A. R., Mehrdadi, N., Hashemian, S. J., Bidhendi, G. R. N., & Moghaddam, R. T. (2011). Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 8(2), 267-280. doi:10.1007/bf03326215 es_ES
dc.description.references Avramenko, Y., Kamami, M., & Kraslawski, A. (2010). Fuzzy Performance Indicators for Decision Making in Selection of Wastewater Treatment Methods. 20th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, 127-132. doi:10.1016/s1570-7946(10)28022-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Tang, X., Wu, Q. Y., Du, Y., Yang, Y., & Hu, H. Y. (2014). Anti-estrogenic activity formation potential assessment and precursor analysis in reclaimed water during chlorination. Water Research, 48, 490-497. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Bottero, M., Comino, E., & Riggio, V. (2011). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(10), 1211-1224. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Wang, X., Hu, X., Hu, C., & Wei, D. (2011). Sequential use of ultraviolet light and chlorine for reclaimed water disinfection. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23(10), 1605-1610. doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(10)60630-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Rosenblum, J., Ge, C., Bohrerova, Z., Yousef, A., & Lee, J. (2012). Ozonation as a clean technology for fresh produce industry and environment: sanitizer efficiency and wastewater quality. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113(4), 837-845. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05393.x es_ES
dc.description.references Chatzisymeon, E., Droumpali, A., Mantzavinos, D., & Venieri, D. (2011). Disinfection of water and wastewater by UV-A and UV-C irradiation: application of real-time PCR method. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 10(3), 389-395. doi:10.1039/c0pp00161a es_ES
dc.description.references Bick, A., Gillerman, L., Manor, Y., & Oron, G. (2012). Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse. Water, 4(1), 219-236. doi:10.3390/w4010219 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhou, H., & Smith, D. W. (2001). Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(S1), 49-66. doi:10.1139/cjce-28-s1-49 es_ES
dc.description.references Zurita, F., & White, J. (2014). Comparative Study of Three Two-Stage Hybrid Ecological Wastewater Treatment Systems for Producing High Nutrient, Reclaimed Water for Irrigation Reuse in Developing Countries. Water, 6(2), 213-228. doi:10.3390/w6020213 es_ES
dc.description.references Ávila, C., Garfí, M., & García, J. (2013). Three-stage hybrid constructed wetland system for wastewater treatment and reuse in warm climate regions. Ecological Engineering, 61, 43-49. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.048 es_ES
dc.description.references Canto-Perello, J., Curiel-Esparza, J., & Calvo, V. (2013). Criticality and threat analysis on utility tunnels for planning security policies of utilities in urban underground space. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4707-4714. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.031 es_ES
dc.description.references Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(6), 432-445. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00599.x es_ES
dc.description.references Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2002). Multicriteria Planning of Post-Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(3), 211-220. doi:10.1111/1467-8667.00269 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem