- -

Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Curiel-Esparza, J.; Cuenca-Ruiz, MA.; Martín Utrillas, MG.; Cantó Perelló, J. (2014). Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects. Water. 6(9):2732-2747. doi:10.3390/w6092732

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/57062

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Selecting a sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects
Autor: Curiel-Esparza, Jorge Cuenca-Ruiz, Marco Antonio Martín Utrillas, Manuel Guzmán Cantó Perelló, Julián
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Física Aplicada - Departament de Física Aplicada
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil - Departament d'Enginyeria de la Construcció i de Projectes d'Enginyeria Civil
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] This paper presents an application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) by integrating a Delphi process for selecting the best sustainable disinfection technique for wastewater reuse projects. The proposed ...[+]
Palabras clave: Wastewater reuse , Disinfection technologies , Expert systems , AHP-Delphi , VIKOR , Multicriteria decision making
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
Water. (issn: 2073-4441 )
DOI: 10.3390/w6092732
Editorial:
MDPI
Versión del editor: http://doi.org/10.3390/w6092732
Tipo: Artículo

References

Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for the Community Action in the Field of Water Policy http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0060:EN:NOT

Scholz, M. (2013). Sustainable Water Systems. Water, 5(1), 239-242. doi:10.3390/w5010239

Lazarova, V., Sturny, V., & Sang, G. T. (2012). Relevance and Benefits of Urban Water Reuse in Tourist Areas. Water, 4(1), 107-122. doi:10.3390/w4010107 [+]
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for the Community Action in the Field of Water Policy http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0060:EN:NOT

Scholz, M. (2013). Sustainable Water Systems. Water, 5(1), 239-242. doi:10.3390/w5010239

Lazarova, V., Sturny, V., & Sang, G. T. (2012). Relevance and Benefits of Urban Water Reuse in Tourist Areas. Water, 4(1), 107-122. doi:10.3390/w4010107

Gómez-López, M. D., Bayo, J., García-Cascales, M. S., & Angosto, J. M. (2009). Decision support in disinfection technologies for treated wastewater reuse. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1504-1511. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.06.008

Hunt, D., & Rogers, C. (2014). A Benchmarking System for Domestic Water Use. Sustainability, 6(5), 2993-3018. doi:10.3390/su6052993

Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2012). Understanding the major drivers for implementation of municipal sustainable policies in underground space. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(6), 506-514. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.732973

Singhirunnusorn, W., & Stenstrom, M. K. (2009). Appropriate wastewater treatment systems for developing countries: criteria and indictor assessment in Thailand. Water Science and Technology, 59(9), 1873-1884. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.215

Kildienė, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2014). COMPLEX ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 20(2), 280-290. doi:10.3846/13923730.2014.904813

Curiel-Esparza, J., Canto-Perello, J., & Calvo, M. A. (2004). Establishing sustainable strategies in urban underground engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(3), 523-530. doi:10.1007/s11948-004-0009-5

Zhang, R., Zhang, X., Yang, J., & Yuan, H. (2013). Wetland ecosystem stability evaluation by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach in Yinchuan Plain, China. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(3-4), 366-374. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2012.06.014

Anagnostopoulos, K., & Vavatsikos, A. (2012). Site Suitability Analysis for Natural Systems for Wastewater Treatment with Spatial Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(2), 125-134. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000155

Kim, Y., Chung, E.-S., Jun, S.-M., & Kim, S. U. (2013). Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater instream use in an urban watershed using fuzzy TOPSIS. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73, 23-32. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.009

Fontana, M. E., & Morais, D. C. (2013). Using Promethee V to Select Alternatives so as to Rehabilitate Water Supply Network with Detected Leaks. Water Resources Management, 27(11), 4021-4037. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0393-1

Pophali, G. R., Chelani, A. B., & Dhodapkar, R. S. (2011). Optimal selection of full scale tannery effluent treatment alternative using integrated AHP and GRA approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 10889-10895. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.129

Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., & Asolekar, S. R. (2013). The influence of expert opinions on the selection of wastewater treatment alternatives: A group decision-making approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 844-851. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.034

Jing, L., Chen, B., Zhang, B., & Li, P. (2013). A Hybrid Stochastic-Interval Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritizing the Strategies of Reusing Treated Wastewater. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2013/874805

Zeng, G., Jiang, R., Huang, G., Xu, M., & Li, J. (2007). Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2), 250-259. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.024

Sadeghi, N., Fayek, A. R., & Pedrycz, W. (2010). Fuzzy Monte Carlo Simulation and Risk Assessment in Construction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25(4), 238-252. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00632.x

Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2013). Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13(2), 276-285. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.001

Oliveira, S. M. A. C., & von Sperling, M. (2007). Reliability analysis of stabilisation pond systems. Water Science and Technology, 55(11), 127-134. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.343

Karimi, A. R., Mehrdadi, N., Hashemian, S. J., Bidhendi, G. R. N., & Moghaddam, R. T. (2011). Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 8(2), 267-280. doi:10.1007/bf03326215

Avramenko, Y., Kamami, M., & Kraslawski, A. (2010). Fuzzy Performance Indicators for Decision Making in Selection of Wastewater Treatment Methods. 20th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, 127-132. doi:10.1016/s1570-7946(10)28022-7

Tang, X., Wu, Q. Y., Du, Y., Yang, Y., & Hu, H. Y. (2014). Anti-estrogenic activity formation potential assessment and precursor analysis in reclaimed water during chlorination. Water Research, 48, 490-497. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.009

Bottero, M., Comino, E., & Riggio, V. (2011). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(10), 1211-1224. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002

Wang, X., Hu, X., Hu, C., & Wei, D. (2011). Sequential use of ultraviolet light and chlorine for reclaimed water disinfection. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23(10), 1605-1610. doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(10)60630-4

Rosenblum, J., Ge, C., Bohrerova, Z., Yousef, A., & Lee, J. (2012). Ozonation as a clean technology for fresh produce industry and environment: sanitizer efficiency and wastewater quality. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113(4), 837-845. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05393.x

Chatzisymeon, E., Droumpali, A., Mantzavinos, D., & Venieri, D. (2011). Disinfection of water and wastewater by UV-A and UV-C irradiation: application of real-time PCR method. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 10(3), 389-395. doi:10.1039/c0pp00161a

Bick, A., Gillerman, L., Manor, Y., & Oron, G. (2012). Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse. Water, 4(1), 219-236. doi:10.3390/w4010219

Zhou, H., & Smith, D. W. (2001). Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(S1), 49-66. doi:10.1139/cjce-28-s1-49

Zurita, F., & White, J. (2014). Comparative Study of Three Two-Stage Hybrid Ecological Wastewater Treatment Systems for Producing High Nutrient, Reclaimed Water for Irrigation Reuse in Developing Countries. Water, 6(2), 213-228. doi:10.3390/w6020213

Ávila, C., Garfí, M., & García, J. (2013). Three-stage hybrid constructed wetland system for wastewater treatment and reuse in warm climate regions. Ecological Engineering, 61, 43-49. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.048

Canto-Perello, J., Curiel-Esparza, J., & Calvo, V. (2013). Criticality and threat analysis on utility tunnels for planning security policies of utilities in urban underground space. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4707-4714. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.031

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1

Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(6), 432-445. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00599.x

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2002). Multicriteria Planning of Post-Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(3), 211-220. doi:10.1111/1467-8667.00269

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem