- -

Perceived usefulness of innovation programs for high-tech and low-tech firms

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Perceived usefulness of innovation programs for high-tech and low-tech firms

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Belso Martínez, JA.; Molina Morales, FX.; Mas Verdú, F. (2013). Perceived usefulness of innovation programs for high-tech and low-tech firms. Management Decision. 51(6):1190-1206. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2012-0314

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/62030

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Perceived usefulness of innovation programs for high-tech and low-tech firms
Autor: Belso Martínez, José Antonio Molina Morales, Francesc Xavier Mas Verdú, Francisco
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Purpose – Despite the sizable amount of previous research on this topic, little is known about the reasons why firms decide to start collaboration projects with innovation advanced service providers, such as universities ...[+]
Palabras clave: Regional innovation systems , University , Technological centres , Innovation programmes , Capability , Perceived usefulness , Spain , Innovation
Derechos de uso: Cerrado
Fuente:
Management Decision. (issn: 0025-1747 )
DOI: 10.1108/MD-04-2012-0314
Editorial:
Emerald
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2012-0314
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2010-20557/ES/LA CONTRIBUCION DE LAS REDES INTERORGANIZACIONALES A LA PERFORMANCE DE LAS EMPRESAS LOCALIZADAS EN LOS DISTRITOS INDUSTRIALES%2FCLUSTERS. UN ANALISIS MULTISECTORIAL DESDE UNA PE/
Descripción: This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/MD-04-2012-0314. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Agradecimientos:
This paper has benefited from the excellent comments of two anonymous referees. Financial support provided by Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness is gratefully acknowledged (Project ECO2010-20557).
Tipo: Artículo

References

Albors-Garrigos, J., Zabaleta, N., & Ganzarain, J. (2010). New R&D management paradigms: rethinking research and technology organizations strategies in regions. R&D Management, 40(5), 435-454. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00611.x

Alecke, B., Alsleben, C., Scharr, F., & Untiedt, G. (2006). Are there really high-tech clusters? The geographic concentration of German manufacturing industries and its determinants. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(1), 19-42. doi:10.1007/s00168-005-0014-x

Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego-Rico, A. (2008). Are Technology Institutes a Satisfactory Tool for Public Intervention in the Area of Technology? A Neoclassical and Evolutionary Evaluation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(4), 808-823. doi:10.1068/c70m [+]
Albors-Garrigos, J., Zabaleta, N., & Ganzarain, J. (2010). New R&D management paradigms: rethinking research and technology organizations strategies in regions. R&D Management, 40(5), 435-454. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00611.x

Alecke, B., Alsleben, C., Scharr, F., & Untiedt, G. (2006). Are there really high-tech clusters? The geographic concentration of German manufacturing industries and its determinants. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(1), 19-42. doi:10.1007/s00168-005-0014-x

Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego-Rico, A. (2008). Are Technology Institutes a Satisfactory Tool for Public Intervention in the Area of Technology? A Neoclassical and Evolutionary Evaluation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(4), 808-823. doi:10.1068/c70m

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8-9), 1237-1263. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001

Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. R. (2009). Life Cycle vs. Multiple Path Dependency in Industrial Districts. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 505-528. doi:10.1080/09654310802682065

BENNETT, R. J., & ROBSON, P. J. A. (1999). The use of external business advice by SMEs in Britain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11(2), 155-180. doi:10.1080/089856299283245

Bessant, J. and Rush, H. (1995), “The globalization of technology: a new taxonomy”,Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 121‐140.

Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2005). Recent Location of Foreign-owned Research and Development Activities by Large Multinational Corporations in the European Regions: The Role of Spillovers and Externalities. Regional Studies, 39(1), 1-16. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320824

Capó‐Vicedo, J., Expósito‐Langa, M. and Molina‐Morales, X. (2011), “La universidad en los distritos industriales ante el cambio en el contexto competitivo”,Investigaciones Regionales, Vol. 19, pp. 137‐145.

Castrogiovanni, G. J., Domenech, J., & Mas-Verdú, F. (2011). Variations in SME Characteristics and the Use of Service Intermediaries for R&D. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 29(2), 154-164. doi:10.1002/cjas.231

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. doi:10.2307/2393553

Davenport, S. (2005). Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition. Research Policy, 34(5), 683-701. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.006

DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953-968. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199910)20:10<953::aid-smj59>3.0.co;2-3

De Jong, J. P. J., & Freel, M. (2010). Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. Research Policy, 39(1), 47-54. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.003

Diaz-Diaz, N. L., Aguiar-Diaz, I., & Saa-Perez, P. (2006). Technological knowledge assets in industrial firms. R and D Management, 36(2), 189-203. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00425.x

Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133-153. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002

Ernst, D. (2007). Beyond the «Global Factory» model: innovative capabilities for upgrading China’s IT industry. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 3(4), 437. doi:10.1504/ijtg.2007.015459

De Lucio, I. F., Mas-Verdu, F., & Tortosa, E. (2009). Regional innovation policies: the persistence of the linear model in Spain. The Service Industries Journal, 30(5), 749-762. doi:10.1080/02642060802398093

Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00152-4

García-Quevedo, J., & Mas-Verdú, F. (2008). Does only size matter in the use of knowledge intensive services? Small Business Economics, 31(2), 137-146. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9090-x

Quevedo, J. G., Verdu, F. M., & Soriano, D. R. (2011). The heterogeneity of services and the differential effects on business and territorial innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 54(1), 80. doi:10.1504/ijtm.2011.038830

Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the Game: The Place of Institutions in Regional Economic Change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1-15. doi:10.1080/00343400903389979

Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. doi:10.2307/41166664

Gunasekara, C. (2006). Universities and associative regional governance: Australian evidence in non-core metropolitan regions. Regional Studies, 40(7), 727-741. doi:10.1080/00343400600959355

Hassink, R. (2005). How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 521-535. doi:10.1080/09654310500107134

Holmström, M. (2006), “Globalisation and good work: IMPIVA, a Spanish project to regenerate industrial districts”,Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 97 No. 5, pp. 491‐502.

Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715-728. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005

Huggins, R., Jones, M., & Upton, S. (2008). Universities as drivers of knowledge-based regional development: a triple helix analysis of Wales. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1), 24. doi:10.1504/ijird.2008.016858

Inkinen, T., & Suorsa, K. (2010). Intermediaries in Regional Innovation Systems: High-Technology Enterprise Survey from Northern Finland. European Planning Studies, 18(2), 169-187. doi:10.1080/09654310903491556

Lambooy, J. (2005). Innovation and knowledge: Theory and regional policy. European Planning Studies, 13(8), 1137-1152. doi:10.1080/09654310500336444

Mas-Verdú, F. (2006). Services and innovation systems: European models of Technology Centres. Service Business, 1(1), 7-23. doi:10.1007/s11628-006-0002-y

MOLINA-MORALES, F. X. (2005). The Territorial Agglomerations of Firms: A Social Capital Perspective from the Spanish Tile Industry. Growth and Change, 36(1), 74-99. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2005.00267.x

Muscio, A. (2007). THE IMPACT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY ON SMEs’ COLLABORATION. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(8), 653-668. doi:10.1080/10438590600983994

Pearce, J. A., & Robbins, D. K. (2008). Strategic transformation as the essential last step in the process of business turnaround. Business Horizons, 51(2), 121-130. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2007.11.003

Sapsed, J., Grantham, A., & DeFillippi, R. (2007). A bridge over troubled waters: Bridging organisations and entrepreneurial opportunities in emerging sectors. Research Policy, 36(9), 1314-1334. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.003

Simmie, J. (2005). Critical surveys edited by Stephen Roper innovation and space: A critical review of the literature. Regional Studies, 39(6), 789-804. doi:10.1080/00343400500213671

Smallbone, D., North, D., & Leigh, R. (1993). The use of external assistance by mature SMEs in the UK: some policy implications. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5(3), 279-295. doi:10.1080/08985629300000017

Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. Research Policy, 31(6), 947-967. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00172-x

Tether∗, B. S. (2003). The sources and aims of innovation in services: Variety between and within sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(6), 481-505. doi:10.1080/1043859022000029221

Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018

Un, C. A., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Asakawa, K. (2010). R&D Collaborations and Product Innovation*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 673-689. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00744.x

Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5-6), 355-379. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.008

Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 88-109. doi:10.1002/smj.806

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem