- -

Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies

Show full item record

Baviera Puig, MA.; Gómez Navarro, T.; García Melón, M.; García Martínez, G. (2015). Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies. Sustainability. 7(8):11010-11031. doi:10.3390/su70811010

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/62900

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies
Author: Baviera Puig, Maria Amparo Gómez Navarro, Tomás García Melón, Mónica García Martínez, Gabriel
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria
Issued date:
Abstract:
Sustainability reports are tools for disseminating information to stakeholders and the public, serving the organizations in the dual purpose of communicating CSR and being accountable. The production of these reports has ...[+]
Subjects: CSR , Sustainability reports , Multi-stakeholder , ANP , MCDM , GRI
Copyrigths: Reconocimiento (by)
Source:
Sustainability. (issn: 2071-1050 )
DOI: 10.3390/su70811010
Publisher:
MDPI AG
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su70811010
Description: © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Type: Artículo

References

Brønn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222. doi:10.1080/02650487.2001.11104887

Golob, U., & Bartlett, J. L. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001

Kim, H., Hur, W.-M., & Yeo, J. (2015). Corporate Brand Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Consumer Perception of CSR, Corporate Hypocrisy, and Corporate Reputation. Sustainability, 7(4), 3683-3694. doi:10.3390/su7043683 [+]
Brønn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222. doi:10.1080/02650487.2001.11104887

Golob, U., & Bartlett, J. L. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001

Kim, H., Hur, W.-M., & Yeo, J. (2015). Corporate Brand Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Consumer Perception of CSR, Corporate Hypocrisy, and Corporate Reputation. Sustainability, 7(4), 3683-3694. doi:10.3390/su7043683

Merkelsen, H. (2011). The double‐edged sword of legitimacy in public relations. Journal of Communication Management, 15(2), 125-143. doi:10.1108/13632541111126355

Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for Sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 522-529. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00527.x

Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Marriage of Convenience or Shotgun Wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103-113. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1

Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2011). The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227-242. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4

Ziek, P. (2009). Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(3), 137-145. doi:10.1002/csr.183

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2013). Analyzing Sector-Specific CSR Reporting: Social and Environmental Disclosure to Investors in the Chemicals and Banking and Insurance Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(2), 113-128. doi:10.1002/csr.1338

Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122-136. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27745504

Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report Corporate Social Responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113-124. doi:10.1080/13527260701856657

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987

Arendt, S., & Brettel, M. (2010). Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance. Management Decision, 48(10), 1469-1492. doi:10.1108/00251741011090289

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2013). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53-63. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5

Vlachos, P. A. (2012). Corporate social performance and consumer‐retailer emotional attachment. European Journal of Marketing, 46(11/12), 1559-1580. doi:10.1108/03090561211259989

Susnienė, D., & Purvinis, O. (2013). EMPIRICAL INSIGHTS ON UNDERSTANDING STAKEHOLDER INFLUENCE. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(4), 845-860. doi:10.3846/16111699.2013.785974

Choi, Y., & Yu, Y. (2014). The Influence of Perceived Corporate Sustainability Practices on Employees and Organizational Performance. Sustainability, 6(1), 348-364. doi:10.3390/su6010348

Lindgreen, A., Xu, Y., Maon, F., & Wilcock, J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility brand leadership: a multiple case study. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 965-993. doi:10.1108/03090561211230142

Fassin, Y. (2008). SMEs and the fallacy of formalising CSR. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 364-378. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00540.x

Welford, R. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2005(17), 33-52. doi:10.9774/gleaf.4700.2005.sp.00007

Perrini, F. (2006). The Practitioner’s Perspective on Non-Financial Reporting. California Management Review, 48(2), 73-103. doi:10.2307/41166339

Coupland, C. (2006). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: Currency in the banking sector? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(7), 865-881. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2005.01.001

Knox, S., Maklan, S., & French, P. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7-28. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0303-4

Hah, K., & Freeman, S. (2013). Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR: A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 125-136. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1753-8

Shen, L., Govindan, K., & Shankar, M. (2015). Evaluation of Barriers of Corporate Social Responsibility Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process under a Fuzzy Environment—A Textile Case. Sustainability, 7(3), 3493-3514. doi:10.3390/su7033493

Sanfey, A., & Hastie, R. (1998). Does Evidence Presentation Format Affect Judgment? An Experimental Evaluation of Displays of Data for Judgments. Psychological Science, 9(2), 99-103. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00018

Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37-44. doi:10.1177/0272989x0102100105

Kim, P., Eng, T. R., Deering, M. J., & Maxfield, A. (1999). Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ, 318(7184), 647-649. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647

Walsh, L. (2009). The Common Topoi of STEM Discourse: An Apologia and Methodological Proposal, With Pilot Survey. Written Communication, 27(1), 120-156. doi:10.1177/0741088309353501

Widiarto Sutantoputra, A. (2009). Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms’ CSR reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(1), 34-48. doi:10.1108/13563280910931063

SCHELLENS, P. J., & DEJONG, M. (1997). Revision of Public Information Brochures on the Basis of Reader Feedback. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11(4), 483-501. doi:10.1177/1050651997011004007

Idowu, S. O., & Towler, B. A. (2004). A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 420-437. doi:10.1108/14777830410540153

Cuganesan, S., Guthrie, J., & Ward, L. (2010). Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry. Accounting Forum, 34(3-4), 169-183. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2010.07.001

Montazar, A., Gheidari, O. N., & Snyder, R. L. (2013). A fuzzy analytical hierarchy methodology for the performance assessment of irrigation projects. Agricultural Water Management, 121, 113-123. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2013.01.011

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3-19. doi:10.1177/0092070303258971

Felice, F. D., & Petrillo, A. (2014). Proposal of a structured methodology for the measure of intangible criteria and for decision making. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 9(3), 157. doi:10.1504/ijspm.2014.064392

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record