- -

A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: forests-06-01696.pdf
Tamaño: 2.906Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Segura Maroto, Marina es_ES
dc.contributor.author Maroto Álvarez, Mª Concepción es_ES
dc.contributor.author Belton, Valerie es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ginestar Peiro, Concepción Mª es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-09T14:25:06Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-09T14:25:06Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.issn 1999-4907
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/63801
dc.description © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) es_ES
dc.description.abstract Collaborative management is a new framework to help implement programmes in protected areas. Within this context, the aim of this work is twofold. First, to propose a robust methodology to implement collaborative management focused on ecosystem services. Second, to develop indicators for the main functions of ecosystem services. Decision makers, technical staff and other stakeholders are included in the process from the beginning, by identifying ecosystem services and eliciting preferences using the AHP method. Qualitative and quantitative data are then integrated into a PROMETHEE based method in order to obtain indicators for provisioning, maintenance and direct to citizens services. This methodology, which has been applied in a forest area, provides a tool for exploiting available technical and social data in a continuous process, as well as providing easy to understand graphical results. This approach also overcomes the difficulties found in prioritizing management objectives in a multiple criteria context with limited resources and facilitates consensus between all of the people involved. The new indicators define an innovative approach to assessing the ecosystem services from the supply perspective and provide basic information to help establish payment systems for environmental services and compensation for natural disasters. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors acknowledge the support received from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research project Ref. ECO2011-27369, as well as the time and expert judgments from all the decision makers, technical staff, other stakeholders and citizens involved in the surveys we have carried out. A special mention to the director and technical staff of the Serra d'Espada Natural Park for all support and collaboration with this research. Marina Segura also thanks the Ministry of Education for support through the scholarship of Training Plan of University Teaching for developing her doctoral thesis. We also thank the reviewers for their suggestions to improve the paper. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Forests es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Collaborative management es_ES
dc.subject Ecosystem services assessment es_ES
dc.subject Multiple criteria decision analysis es_ES
dc.subject AHP es_ES
dc.subject PROMETHEE es_ES
dc.subject Natural resource management es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.title A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/f6051696
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2011-27369/ES/TECNICAS MULTICRITERIO Y TOMA DE DECISIONES PARTICIPATIVA PARA UNA GESTION SOSTENIBLE/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Segura Maroto, M.; Maroto Álvarez, MC.; Belton, V.; Ginestar Peiro, CM. (2015). A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests. 6(5):1696-1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6051696 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f6051696 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1696 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1720 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 6 es_ES
dc.description.issue 5 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 305767 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.description.references Fitzsimons, J., Pearson, C. J., Lawson, C., & Hill, M. J. (2012). Evaluation of land-use planning in greenbelts based on intrinsic characteristics and stakeholder values. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), 23-34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Kijazi, M. H., & Kant, S. (2011). Social acceptability of alternative forest regimes in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using stakeholder attitudes as metrics of uncertainty. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 242-257. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Mustajoki, J., Saarikoski, H., Marttunen, M., Ahtikoski, A., Hallikainen, V., Helle, T., … Ylisirniö, A.-L. (2011). Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(6), 1550-1563. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Palacios-Agundez, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Madariaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2013). The Relevance of Local Participatory Scenario Planning for Ecosystem Management Policies in the Basque Country, Northern Spain. Ecology and Society, 18(3). doi:10.5751/es-05619-180307 es_ES
dc.description.references Tompkins, E. L., Few, R., & Brown, K. (2008). Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: Incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1580-1592. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.025 es_ES
dc.description.references Apostolopoulou, E., Drakou, E. G., & Pediaditi, K. (2012). Participation in the management of Greek Natura 2000 sites: Evidence from a cross-level analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 308-318. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, J., Ouyang, Z., & Miao, H. (2010). Environmental attitudes of stakeholders and their perceptions regarding protected area-community conflicts: A case study in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(11), 2254-2262. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Rees, S. E., Attrill, M. J., Austen, M. C., Mangi, S. C., & Rodwell, L. D. (2013). A thematic cost-benefit analysis of a marine protected area. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 476-485. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.048 es_ES
dc.description.references Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230(1-3), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023 es_ES
dc.description.references De Brucker, K., Macharis, C., & Verbeke, A. (2013). Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 122-131. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021 es_ES
dc.description.references Petrokofsky, G., Brown, N. D., Hemery, G. E., Woodward, S., Wilson, E., Weatherall, A., … Arnold, J. E. M. (2010). A participatory process for identifying and prioritizing policy-relevant research questions in natural resource management: a case study from the UK forestry sector. Forestry, 83(4), 357-367. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpq018 es_ES
dc.description.references Maroto Álvarez, C., Segura, M., Ginestar, C., Uriol, J., & Segura, B. (2013). Sustainable Forest Management in a Mediterranean region: Social preferences. Forest Systems, 22(3), 546. doi:10.5424/fs/2013223-04135 es_ES
dc.description.references Segura, M., Ray, D., & Maroto, C. (2014). Decision support systems for forest management: A comparative analysis and assessment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 101, 55-67. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinez-Harms, M. J., Bryan, B. A., Balvanera, P., Law, E. A., Rhodes, J. R., Possingham, H. P., & Wilson, K. A. (2015). Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 184, 229-238. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024 es_ES
dc.description.references Sijtsma, F. J., van der Heide, C. M., & van Hinsberg, A. (2013). Beyond monetary measurement: How to evaluate projects and policies using the ecosystem services framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 32, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.016 es_ES
dc.description.references Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307-317. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00153-x es_ES
dc.description.references Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Bossi Fedrigotti, V., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. (2013). Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Economics, 93, 128-136. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A., & Macharis, C. (2011). A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 954-965. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104 es_ES
dc.description.references Macharis, C., Turcksin, L., & Lebeau, K. (2012). Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 610-620. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021 es_ES
dc.description.references Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 3578-3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009). A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2535-2548. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Vacik, H., Kurttila, M., Hujala, T., Khadka, C., Haara, A., Pykäläinen, J., … Tikkanen, J. (2014). Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 304-315. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.029 es_ES
dc.description.references Fisher, B., & Kerry Turner, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141(5), 1167-1169. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019 es_ES
dc.description.references Corner, J., Buchanan, J., & Henig, M. (2001). Dynamic decision problem structuring. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10(3), 129-141. doi:10.1002/mcda.295 es_ES
dc.description.references Marques-Perez, I., Segura, B., & Maroto, C. (2014). Evaluating the functionality of agricultural systems: social preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The «Huerta de Valencia» as case study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(4), 889. doi:10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061 es_ES
dc.description.references Xu, Z. (2000). On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 683-687. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00082-x es_ES
dc.description.references Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J.-M., & Boulaire, C. (1998). A stakeholder approach to MCDA. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15(1), 15-32. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1<15::aid-sres179>3.0.co;2-b es_ES
dc.description.references Harrison, S. R., & Qureshi, M. E. (2000). Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models. Natural Resources Forum, 24(1), 11-19. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2000.tb00925.x es_ES
dc.description.references Scholten, L., Scheidegger, A., Reichert, P., Mauer, M., & Lienert, J. (2014). Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Research, 49, 124-143. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller, K. A., & Belton, V. (2014). Water resource management and climate change adaptation: a holistic and multiple criteria perspective. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(3), 289-308. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9537-0 es_ES
dc.description.references The OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/ es_ES
dc.description.references Parcs Naturals de la Comunitat Valenciana http://www.cma.gva.es/webdoc/documento.ashx?id=141553 es_ES
dc.description.references The List of Wetlands of International Importance http://www.ramsar.org es_ES
dc.description.references De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. . (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393-408. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Costanza, R., d’ Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., … van den Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3-15. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00020-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Plan de Acción Territorial Forestal de la Comunitat Valenciana http://www.cma.gva.es/webdoc/documento.ashx?id=144302 es_ES
dc.description.references Tofallis, C. (2014). Add or Multiply? A Tutorial on Ranking and Choosing with Multiple Criteria. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 14(3), 109-119. doi:10.1287/ited.2013.0124 es_ES
dc.description.references Valls-Donderis, P., Vallés, M. C., & Galiana, F. (2015). Criteria and indicators for sustainable forestry under Mediterranean conditions applicable in Spain at the forest management unit scale. Forest Systems, 24(1), 004. doi:10.5424/fs/2015241-05542 es_ES
dc.description.references Ananda, J. (2007). Implementing Participatory Decision Making in Forest Planning. Environmental Management, 39(4), 534-544. doi:10.1007/s00267-006-0031-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Mendelsohn, R., & Olmstead, S. (2009). The Economic Valuation of Environmental Amenities and Disamenities: Methods and Applications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 325-347. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-011509-135201 es_ES
dc.description.references Wilson, M. A., & Hoehn, J. P. (2006). Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: The state-of-the art and science. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 335-342. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.015 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem