- -

Physicochemical Quality Parameters at the Reception of the Honey Packaging Process: Influence of Type of Honey, Year of Harvest, and Beekeeper

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Physicochemical Quality Parameters at the Reception of the Honey Packaging Process: Influence of Type of Honey, Year of Harvest, and Beekeeper

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Juan Borrás, María del Sol es_ES
dc.contributor.author Doménech Antich, Eva Mª es_ES
dc.contributor.author Conchado Peiró, Andrea es_ES
dc.contributor.author Escriche Roberto, Mª Isabel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-16T07:16:22Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-16T07:16:22Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.issn 2090-9071
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/64094
dc.description.abstract [EN] The aim of this paper was to evaluate the influence of the type of honey, year of collection, and the beekeeper on the main physicochemical quality parameters (hydroxymethylfurfural "HMF," moisture, and colour), measured on reception of the raw honey. 1593 samples (11 types of honey categorized by means of pollinic analysis), provided by 98 beekeepers, from 2009 to 2013, were analyzed. Colour was the parameter most affected by the type of honey and year, whereas HMF was the least affected in both cases. The clearest honeys were found to have the greatest moisture (orange, rosemary, and lemon) and the darkest had the least moisture (lavender stoechas, eucalyptus, sunflower, honeydew and retama). Lavender, polyfloral, and thyme had intermediate values of these parameters. For moisture, most samples were in accordance with international requirements (less than 20 g/100 g). All values were below the required limit for HMF(40mg/kg), although a few of them were abnormally high as they were raw honeys (i.e., 2% of the samples had values higher than 20 mg/kg). The fact that all the inadequate samples came from specific beekeepers highlights the importance of their role, suggesting that training in good practices is the key to guarantee honey quality before it reaches the industry. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Chemistry es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Beekepers es_ES
dc.subject Honey quality es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.subject.classification TECNOLOGIA DE ALIMENTOS es_ES
dc.title Physicochemical Quality Parameters at the Reception of the Honey Packaging Process: Influence of Type of Honey, Year of Harvest, and Beekeeper es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1155/2015/929658
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería de Alimentos para el Desarrollo - Institut Universitari d'Enginyeria d'Aliments per al Desenvolupament es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Tecnología de Alimentos - Departament de Tecnologia d'Aliments es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Centro de Gestión de la Calidad y del Cambio - Centre de Gestió de la Qualitat i del Canvi es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Juan Borras, MDS.; Doménech Antich, EM.; Conchado Peiró, A.; Escriche Roberto, MI. (2015). Physicochemical Quality Parameters at the Reception of the Honey Packaging Process: Influence of Type of Honey, Year of Harvest, and Beekeeper. Journal of Chemistry. 1-6. doi:10.1155/2015/929658 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/929658 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 6 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.relation.senia 291769 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2090-9071
dc.description.references Von Der Ohe, W., Persano Oddo, L., Piana, M. L., Morlot, M., & Martin, P. (2004). Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie, 35(Suppl. 1), S18-S25. doi:10.1051/apido:2004050 es_ES
dc.description.references Escriche, I., Kadar, M., Domenech, E., & Gil-Sánchez, L. (2012). A potentiometric electronic tongue for the discrimination of honey according to the botanical origin. Comparison with traditional methodologies: Physicochemical parameters and volatile profile. Journal of Food Engineering, 109(3), 449-456. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.036 es_ES
dc.description.references Panseri, S., Manzo, A., Chiesa, L. M., & Giorgi, A. (2013). Melissopalynological and Volatile Compounds Analysis of Buckwheat Honey from Different Geographical Origins and Their Role in Botanical Determination. Journal of Chemistry, 2013, 1-11. doi:10.1155/2013/904202 es_ES
dc.description.references Visquert, M., Vargas, M., & Escriche, I. (2013). Effect of postharvest storage conditions on the colour and freshness parameters of raw honey. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 49(1), 181-187. doi:10.1111/ijfs.12296 es_ES
dc.description.references Persano Oddo, L., & Piro, R. (2004). Main European unifloral honeys: descriptive sheets. Apidologie, 35(Suppl. 1), S38-S81. doi:10.1051/apido:2004049 es_ES
dc.description.references Turhan, I., Tetik, N., Karhan, M., Gurel, F., & Reyhan Tavukcuoglu, H. (2008). Quality of honeys influenced by thermal treatment. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 41(8), 1396-1399. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2007.09.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Persano Oddo, L., & Bogdanov, S. (2004). Determination of honey botanical origin: problems and issues. Apidologie, 35(Suppl. 1), S2-S3. doi:10.1051/apido:2004044 es_ES
dc.description.references Soria, A. C., González, M., de Lorenzo, C., Martı́nez-Castro, I., & Sanz, J. (2004). Characterization of artisanal honeys from Madrid (Central Spain) on the basis of their melissopalynological, physicochemical and volatile composition data. Food Chemistry, 85(1), 121-130. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.06.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Piazza, M. G., & Persano Oddo, L. (2004). Bibliographical review of the main European unifloral honeys. Apidologie, 35(Suppl. 1), S94-S111. doi:10.1051/apido:2004046 es_ES
dc.description.references Oddo, L. P., Heard, T. A., Rodríguez-Malaver, A., Pérez, R. A., Fernández-Muiño, M., Sancho, M. T., … Vit, P. (2008). Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Trigona carbonaria Honey from Australia. Journal of Medicinal Food, 11(4), 789-794. doi:10.1089/jmf.2007.0724 es_ES
dc.description.references Tornuk, F., Karaman, S., Ozturk, I., Toker, O. S., Tastemur, B., Sagdic, O., … Kayacier, A. (2013). Quality characterization of artisanal and retail Turkish blossom honeys: Determination of physicochemical, microbiological, bioactive properties and aroma profile. Industrial Crops and Products, 46, 124-131. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.042 es_ES
dc.description.references Preys, S., Vigneau, E., Mazerolles, G., Cheynier, V., & Bertrand, D. (2007). Multivariate prototype approach for authentication of food products. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 87(2), 200-207. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2007.01.003 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem