- -

Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: -Canto-Perello;MARÍA ...
Tamaño: 2.367Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Canto-Perello, Julian es_ES
dc.contributor.author Martinez-Garcia, María Peña es_ES
dc.contributor.author Curiel Esparza, Jorge es_ES
dc.contributor.author Martín Utrillas, Manuel Guzmán es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-16T09:55:54Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-16T09:55:54Z
dc.date.issued 2015-06
dc.identifier.issn 2071-1050
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/64107
dc.description.abstract Technological advances have allowed the development of new roof assembly typologies with higher efficiency and less waste. However, in the construction sector the focus is generally on reducing cost and not in sustainable development factors. Short-sighted building planning based only on economic criteria should be avoided improving decision support systems. In addition, the selection of an appropriate roof assembly in a building s design stage is a complex problem due to the existence of different tangible and intangible factors and the multiple alternatives available. The roof typologies under study involve prefabricated concrete, steel and laminated wood structures. This research work applies a multi-criteria hybrid model combining the Analytical Hierarchy Process with the Delphi method and the VIKOR technique for implementing sustainability criteria in the selection of a roof assembly in medium span buildings. The proposed decision support system enables the use of the triple bottom line that considers economic, social and environmental criteria. Under the criteria analyzed, the compromise solution found is the self-supporting curved system. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Sustainability es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Roof assembly es_ES
dc.subject Triple bottom line es_ES
dc.subject Multicriteria decision making es_ES
dc.subject DECISION-MAKING MODEL es_ES
dc.subject LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT es_ES
dc.subject UNDERGROUND SPACE es_ES
dc.subject UTILITY TUNNELS es_ES
dc.subject VIKOR METHOD es_ES
dc.subject SYSTEMS es_ES
dc.subject ENERGY es_ES
dc.subject CONCRETE es_ES
dc.subject DESIGN es_ES
dc.subject AHP es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA DE LA CONSTRUCCION es_ES
dc.subject.classification FISICA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/su7066854
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil - Departament d'Enginyeria de la Construcció i de Projectes d'Enginyeria Civil es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Física Aplicada - Departament de Física Aplicada es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Canto-Perello, J.; Martinez-Garcia, MP.; Curiel Esparza, J.; Martín Utrillas, MG. (2015). Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings. Sustainability. 7(6):6854-6871. doi:10.3390/su7066854 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su7066854 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 6854 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 6871 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 7 es_ES
dc.description.issue 6 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 290510 es_ES
dc.description.references United Nations 1998 Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Changehttp://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Canto-Perello, J., & Curiel-Esparza, J. (2013). Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 33, 82-87. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2012.08.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Aguado, A., Caño, A. del, de la Cruz, M. P., Gómez, D., & Josa, A. (2012). Sustainability Assessment of Concrete Structures within the Spanish Structural Concrete Code. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), 268-276. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000419 es_ES
dc.description.references Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592-1600. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Reza, B., Sadiq, R., & Hewage, K. (2011). Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 2053-2066. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.041 es_ES
dc.description.references Zadeh, S., Hunt, D., Lombardi, D., & Rogers, C. (2013). Shared Urban Greywater Recycling Systems: Water Resource Savings and Economic Investment. Sustainability, 5(7), 2887-2912. doi:10.3390/su5072887 es_ES
dc.description.references Hunt, D., & Rogers, C. (2014). A Benchmarking System for Domestic Water Use. Sustainability, 6(5), 2993-3018. doi:10.3390/su6052993 es_ES
dc.description.references Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2012). Understanding the major drivers for implementation of municipal sustainable policies in underground space. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(6), 506-514. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.732973 es_ES
dc.description.references Collier, Z. A., Wang, D., Vogel, J. T., Tatham, E. K., & Linkov, I. (2013). Sustainable roofing technology under multiple constraints: a decision-analytical approach. Environment Systems and Decisions, 33(2), 261-271. doi:10.1007/s10669-013-9446-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Ozdemir, M. S., & Saaty, T. L. (2006). The unknown in decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 349-359. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, G. K. L., & Chan, E. H. W. (2007). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Assessment of Urban Renewal Proposals. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 155-168. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9228-x es_ES
dc.description.references Syamsuddin, I., & Hwang, J. (2010). The Use of AHP in Security Policy Decision Making: An Open Office Calc Application. Journal of Software, 5(10). doi:10.4304/jsw.5.10.1162-1169 es_ES
dc.description.references Thapa, R. B., & Murayama, Y. (2010). Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal: Examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Geography, 30(1), 70-83. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Canto-Perello, J., Curiel-Esparza, J., & Calvo, V. (2013). Criticality and threat analysis on utility tunnels for planning security policies of utilities in urban underground space. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4707-4714. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.031 es_ES
dc.description.references Marchais-Roubelat, A., & Roubelat, F. (2011). The Delphi method as a ritual: Inquiring the Delphic Oracle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1491-1499. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525-1536. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2013). Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13(2), 276-285. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Mela, K., Tiainen, T., & Heinisuo, M. (2012). Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(4), 716-726. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2012.03.001 es_ES
dc.description.references San Cristóbal, J. R. (2012). Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(6), 751-758. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000488 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, W.-S. (2013). Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model. The Service Industries Journal, 33(15-16), 1473-1494. doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.634905 es_ES
dc.description.references Rostamzadeh, R., Ismail, K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR ASSISTING BUSINESS ANGELS IN INVESTMENTS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 696-720. doi:10.3846/20294913.2014.984364 es_ES
dc.description.references Tsai, P.-H., & Chang, S.-C. (2014). COMPARING THE APPLE IPAD AND NON-APPLE CAMP TABLET PCS: A MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(Supplement_1), S256-S284. doi:10.3846/20294913.2013.881929 es_ES
dc.description.references San-José, J. T., Garrucho, I., Losada, R., & Cuadrado, J. (2007). A proposal for environmental indicators towards industrial building sustainable assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(2), 160-173. doi:10.1080/13504500709469716 es_ES
dc.description.references Martin-Utrillas, M., Reyes-Medina, M., Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2014). Hybrid method for selection of the optimal process of leachate treatment in waste treatment and valorization plants or landfills. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(4), 873-885. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0834-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Łowińska-Kluge, A., & Błaszczyński, T. (2012). The influence of internal corrosion on the durability of concrete. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 12(2), 219-227. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Khosrowshahi, F., & Alani, A. (2011). Visualisation of impact of time on the internal lighting of a building. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 145-154. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, S., Kim, G.-H., & Lee, Y.-D. (2013). Sustainability Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Roof Waterproofing Methods Considering LCCO2. Sustainability, 6(1), 158-174. doi:10.3390/su6010158 es_ES
dc.description.references Lo, S. M., Zhao, C. M., Liu, M., & Coping, A. (2008). A simulation model for studying the implementation of performance-based fire safety design in buildings. Automation in Construction, 17(7), 852-863. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Markelj, J., Kitek Kuzman, M., Grošelj, P., & Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M. (2014). A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects. Sustainability, 6(12), 8775-8795. doi:10.3390/su6128775 es_ES
dc.description.references ALwaer, H., & Clements-Croome, D. J. (2010). Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings. Building and Environment, 45(4), 799-807. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.019 es_ES
dc.description.references Malmqvist, T., Glaumann, M., Scarpellini, S., Zabalza, I., Aranda, A., Llera, E., & Díaz, S. (2011). Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines. Energy, 36(4), 1900-1907. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.026 es_ES
dc.description.references Shao, L., Chen, G. Q., Chen, Z. M., Guo, S., Han, M. Y., Zhang, B., … Ahmad, B. (2014). Systems accounting for energy consumption and carbon emission by building. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 19(6), 1859-1873. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.10.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Zabalza Bribián, I., Valero Capilla, A., & Aranda Usón, A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 46(5), 1133-1140. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Goggins, J., Keane, T., & Kelly, A. (2010). The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland. Energy and Buildings, 42(5), 735-744. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.11.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Broun, R., Babaizadeh, H., Zakersalehi, A., & Menzies, G. (2014). Integrated Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Analysis of Exterior Wall Systems for Residential Buildings. Sustainability, 6(12), 8592-8603. doi:10.3390/su6128592 es_ES
dc.description.references Parasonis, J., Keizikas, A., & Kalibatiene, D. (2012). The relationship between the shape of a building and its energy performance. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(4), 246-256. doi:10.1080/17452007.2012.675139 es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(3-4), 233-244. doi:10.1016/s0895-7177(03)90083-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Kuo, Y., Yang, T., & Huang, G.-W. (2008). The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 80-93. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Curiel-Esparza, J., Cuenca-Ruiz, M., Martin-Utrillas, M., & Canto-Perello, J. (2014). Selecting a Sustainable Disinfection Technique for Wastewater Reuse Projects. Water, 6(9), 2732-2747. doi:10.3390/w6092732 es_ES
dc.description.references Sayadi, M. K., Heydari, M., & Shahanaghi, K. (2009). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(5), 2257-2262. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem