- -

Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Canto-Perello, J.; Martinez-Garcia, MP.; Curiel Esparza, J.; Martín Utrillas, MG. (2015). Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings. Sustainability. 7(6):6854-6871. doi:10.3390/su7066854

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/64107

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: -Canto-Perello;MARÍA ...
Tamaño: 2.367Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir/Preview

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Implementing Sustainability Criteria for Selecting a Roof Assembly Typology in Medium Span Buildings
Autor: Canto-Perello, Julian Martinez-Garcia, María Peña Curiel Esparza, Jorge Martín Utrillas, Manuel Guzmán
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil - Departament d'Enginyeria de la Construcció i de Projectes d'Enginyeria Civil
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Física Aplicada - Departament de Física Aplicada
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
Technological advances have allowed the development of new roof assembly typologies with higher efficiency and less waste. However, in the construction sector the focus is generally on reducing cost and not in sustainable ...[+]
Palabras clave: Roof assembly , Triple bottom line , Multicriteria decision making , DECISION-MAKING MODEL , LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT , UNDERGROUND SPACE , UTILITY TUNNELS , VIKOR METHOD , SYSTEMS , ENERGY , CONCRETE , DESIGN , AHP
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento (by)
Fuente:
Sustainability. (issn: 2071-1050 )
DOI: 10.3390/su7066854
Editorial:
MDPI
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su7066854
Tipo: Artículo

References

United Nations 1998 Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Changehttp://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf

Canto-Perello, J., & Curiel-Esparza, J. (2013). Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 33, 82-87. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2012.08.007

Aguado, A., Caño, A. del, de la Cruz, M. P., Gómez, D., & Josa, A. (2012). Sustainability Assessment of Concrete Structures within the Spanish Structural Concrete Code. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), 268-276. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000419 [+]
United Nations 1998 Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Changehttp://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf

Canto-Perello, J., & Curiel-Esparza, J. (2013). Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 33, 82-87. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2012.08.007

Aguado, A., Caño, A. del, de la Cruz, M. P., Gómez, D., & Josa, A. (2012). Sustainability Assessment of Concrete Structures within the Spanish Structural Concrete Code. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), 268-276. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000419

Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592-1600. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007

Reza, B., Sadiq, R., & Hewage, K. (2011). Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 2053-2066. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.041

Zadeh, S., Hunt, D., Lombardi, D., & Rogers, C. (2013). Shared Urban Greywater Recycling Systems: Water Resource Savings and Economic Investment. Sustainability, 5(7), 2887-2912. doi:10.3390/su5072887

Hunt, D., & Rogers, C. (2014). A Benchmarking System for Domestic Water Use. Sustainability, 6(5), 2993-3018. doi:10.3390/su6052993

Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2012). Understanding the major drivers for implementation of municipal sustainable policies in underground space. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(6), 506-514. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.732973

Collier, Z. A., Wang, D., Vogel, J. T., Tatham, E. K., & Linkov, I. (2013). Sustainable roofing technology under multiple constraints: a decision-analytical approach. Environment Systems and Decisions, 33(2), 261-271. doi:10.1007/s10669-013-9446-5

Ozdemir, M. S., & Saaty, T. L. (2006). The unknown in decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 349-359. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.017

Lee, G. K. L., & Chan, E. H. W. (2007). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Assessment of Urban Renewal Proposals. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 155-168. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9228-x

Syamsuddin, I., & Hwang, J. (2010). The Use of AHP in Security Policy Decision Making: An Open Office Calc Application. Journal of Software, 5(10). doi:10.4304/jsw.5.10.1162-1169

Thapa, R. B., & Murayama, Y. (2010). Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal: Examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Geography, 30(1), 70-83. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.002

Canto-Perello, J., Curiel-Esparza, J., & Calvo, V. (2013). Criticality and threat analysis on utility tunnels for planning security policies of utilities in urban underground space. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4707-4714. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.031

Marchais-Roubelat, A., & Roubelat, F. (2011). The Delphi method as a ritual: Inquiring the Delphic Oracle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1491-1499. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.012

Von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525-1536. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013

Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2013). Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13(2), 276-285. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.001

Mela, K., Tiainen, T., & Heinisuo, M. (2012). Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(4), 716-726. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2012.03.001

San Cristóbal, J. R. (2012). Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(6), 751-758. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000488

Lee, W.-S. (2013). Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model. The Service Industries Journal, 33(15-16), 1473-1494. doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.634905

Rostamzadeh, R., Ismail, K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR ASSISTING BUSINESS ANGELS IN INVESTMENTS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 696-720. doi:10.3846/20294913.2014.984364

Tsai, P.-H., & Chang, S.-C. (2014). COMPARING THE APPLE IPAD AND NON-APPLE CAMP TABLET PCS: A MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(Supplement_1), S256-S284. doi:10.3846/20294913.2013.881929

San-José, J. T., Garrucho, I., Losada, R., & Cuadrado, J. (2007). A proposal for environmental indicators towards industrial building sustainable assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(2), 160-173. doi:10.1080/13504500709469716

Martin-Utrillas, M., Reyes-Medina, M., Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2014). Hybrid method for selection of the optimal process of leachate treatment in waste treatment and valorization plants or landfills. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(4), 873-885. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0834-4

Łowińska-Kluge, A., & Błaszczyński, T. (2012). The influence of internal corrosion on the durability of concrete. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 12(2), 219-227. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.002

Khosrowshahi, F., & Alani, A. (2011). Visualisation of impact of time on the internal lighting of a building. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 145-154. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.012

Kim, S., Kim, G.-H., & Lee, Y.-D. (2013). Sustainability Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Roof Waterproofing Methods Considering LCCO2. Sustainability, 6(1), 158-174. doi:10.3390/su6010158

Lo, S. M., Zhao, C. M., Liu, M., & Coping, A. (2008). A simulation model for studying the implementation of performance-based fire safety design in buildings. Automation in Construction, 17(7), 852-863. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.014

Markelj, J., Kitek Kuzman, M., Grošelj, P., & Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M. (2014). A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects. Sustainability, 6(12), 8775-8795. doi:10.3390/su6128775

ALwaer, H., & Clements-Croome, D. J. (2010). Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings. Building and Environment, 45(4), 799-807. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.019

Malmqvist, T., Glaumann, M., Scarpellini, S., Zabalza, I., Aranda, A., Llera, E., & Díaz, S. (2011). Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines. Energy, 36(4), 1900-1907. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.026

Shao, L., Chen, G. Q., Chen, Z. M., Guo, S., Han, M. Y., Zhang, B., … Ahmad, B. (2014). Systems accounting for energy consumption and carbon emission by building. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 19(6), 1859-1873. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.10.003

Zabalza Bribián, I., Valero Capilla, A., & Aranda Usón, A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 46(5), 1133-1140. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002

Goggins, J., Keane, T., & Kelly, A. (2010). The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland. Energy and Buildings, 42(5), 735-744. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.11.013

Broun, R., Babaizadeh, H., Zakersalehi, A., & Menzies, G. (2014). Integrated Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Analysis of Exterior Wall Systems for Residential Buildings. Sustainability, 6(12), 8592-8603. doi:10.3390/su6128592

Parasonis, J., Keizikas, A., & Kalibatiene, D. (2012). The relationship between the shape of a building and its energy performance. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(4), 246-256. doi:10.1080/17452007.2012.675139

Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(3-4), 233-244. doi:10.1016/s0895-7177(03)90083-5

Kuo, Y., Yang, T., & Huang, G.-W. (2008). The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 80-93. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1

Curiel-Esparza, J., Cuenca-Ruiz, M., Martin-Utrillas, M., & Canto-Perello, J. (2014). Selecting a Sustainable Disinfection Technique for Wastewater Reuse Projects. Water, 6(9), 2732-2747. doi:10.3390/w6092732

Sayadi, M. K., Heydari, M., & Shahanaghi, K. (2009). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(5), 2257-2262. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem