- -

Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Tartari, V.; Salter, A.; Deste Cukierman, P. (2012). Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 36(3):655-677. doi:10.1093/cje/bes007

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/65309

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: -Deste - Crossing ...
Tamaño: 153.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry
Autor: Tartari, Valentina Salter, Ammon Deste Cukierman, Pablo
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
Although academics are under increasing pressure to engage industry in their research, they often find it difficult to do so. Conflicts with industry over the timing of disclosure and the choice of topics are common. ...[+]
Palabras clave: Industry–university collaboration , Barriers to collaboration , Universities , Academic Entrepreneurship
Derechos de uso: Cerrado
Fuente:
Cambridge Journal of Economics. (issn: 0309-166X )
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes007
Editorial:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes007
Tipo: Artículo

References

Arora, A. (2001). Markets for Technology and their Implications for Corporate Strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419-451. doi:10.1093/icc/10.2.419

Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (1996). The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies, 17(3), 365-395. doi:10.1177/017084069601700302

Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0206-5 [+]
Arora, A. (2001). Markets for Technology and their Implications for Corporate Strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419-451. doi:10.1093/icc/10.2.419

Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (1996). The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies, 17(3), 365-395. doi:10.1177/017084069601700302

Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0206-5

Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295

Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739. doi:10.1056/nejm199612053352305

Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694-707. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007

Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 101-118. doi:10.1080/10438590600982830

Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006

Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data Withholding in Academic Genetics. JAMA, 287(4), 473. doi:10.1001/jama.287.4.473

Campbell, E. G., Weissman, J. S., Causino, N., & Blumenthal, D. (2000). Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Research Policy, 29(2), 303-312. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00068-2

Campbell, T. I. D., & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and Administrators’ Attitudes toward Potential Conflicts of Interest, Commitment, and Equity in University-Industry Relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(3), 309. doi:10.2307/2649199

Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2006). Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61-84. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9046-0

D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002

D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2010). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z

Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1

Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321-342. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003

Dechenaux, E., Thursby, M., & Thursby, J. (2009). Shirking, sharing risk and shelving: The role of university license contracts. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(1), 80-91. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.05.001

Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349-367. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008

Dodgson, M. (1992). The strategic management of R&D collaboration. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 4(3), 227-244. doi:10.1080/09537329208524096

Elzinga, A. (1997). The science-society contract in historical transformation: with special reference to «epistemic drift». Social Science Information, 36(3), 411-445. doi:10.1177/053901897036003002

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00069-4

Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2004). Truth for Its Own Sake: Academic Culture and Technology Transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva, 42(2), 105-126. doi:10.1023/b:mine.0000030019.99709.a0

Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39(8), 1060-1069. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.014

Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004

Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240-259. doi:10.1257/aer.91.1.240

Jong, S. (2006). How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 251-283. doi:10.1093/icc/dtj014

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383

Landry, R., Amara, N., & Saïhi, M. (2006). Patenting and spin-off creation by Canadian researchers in engineering and life sciences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 217-249. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9018-7

Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843-863. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00857-8

Lee, Y. S. (2000). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111-133. doi:10.1023/a:1007895322042

Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641-655. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm020

Louis, K. S., Jones, L. M., Anderson, M. S., Blumenthal, D., & Campbell, E. G. (2001). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 233-245. doi:10.1023/a:1011106006976

Mansfield, E., & Lee, J.-Y. (1996). The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25(7), 1047-1058. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00893-1

McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91-103. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814

Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635. doi:10.2307/2089193

Moutinho, P. S. F., Fontes, M., & Godinho, M. M. (2007). Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations. Scientometrics, 70(2), 355-377. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0207-4

Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.008

Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 99-114. doi:10.1023/a:1007892413701

Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619-632. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::aid-jae418>3.0.co;2-1

Polanyi, M. (2000). Minerva, 38(1), 1-21. doi:10.1023/a:1026591624255

Ponomariov, B., & Craig Boardman, P. (2007). The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 301-313. doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9029-z

Reskin, B. F. (1977). Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science. American Sociological Review, 42(3), 491. doi:10.2307/2094753

Rosenberg, N. (1991). Critical issues in science policy research. Science and Public Policy, 18(6), 335-346. doi:10.1093/spp/18.6.335

Sako, M., & Helper, S. (1998). Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(3), 387-417. doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00082-6

Santoro, M. D., & Saparito, P. A. (2003). The firm’s trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 362-373. doi:10.1109/tem.2003.817287

Shane, S. (2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602

Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006

Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144. doi:10.1086/502691

Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K., & Engelen, B. (1990). University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it? Research Policy, 19(6), 551-566. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(90)90012-u

Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.141

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem