- -

Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: -Deste - Crossing ...
Tamaño: 153.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Tartari, Valentina es_ES
dc.contributor.author Salter, Ammon es_ES
dc.contributor.author Deste Cukierman, Pablo es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-06T11:46:27Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-06T11:46:27Z
dc.date.issued 2012-05
dc.identifier.issn 0309-166X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/65309
dc.description.abstract Although academics are under increasing pressure to engage industry in their research, they often find it difficult to do so. Conflicts with industry over the timing of disclosure and the choice of topics are common. Moreover, collaborations with industry may require academics to negotiate formal contracts about the ownership of intellectual property. To help understand the factors that might mitigate these conflicts, this paper examines how the professional and collaborative experiences of academics shape their perceptions of the barriers to industry collaboration. Using a rich dataset of UK academics, we find that perceived barriers to collaboration are lower for academics with industrial and collaborative experience and for those who trust their industry partners. However, for the transactional costs of industry engagement, we find entrepreneurial experience and the diversity of methods used to collaborate with industry increases the perceived barriers to collaboration. Palabras clave es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Oxford University Press (OUP) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Cambridge Journal of Economics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Industry–university collaboration es_ES
dc.subject Barriers to collaboration es_ES
dc.subject Universities es_ES
dc.subject Academic Entrepreneurship es_ES
dc.title Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/cje/bes007
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Tartari, V.; Salter, A.; Deste Cukierman, P. (2012). Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academic perceptions of the barriers to working with industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 36(3):655-677. doi:10.1093/cje/bes007 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes007 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 655 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 677 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 36 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 234279 es_ES
dc.description.references Arora, A. (2001). Markets for Technology and their Implications for Corporate Strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419-451. doi:10.1093/icc/10.2.419 es_ES
dc.description.references Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (1996). The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies, 17(3), 365-395. doi:10.1177/017084069601700302 es_ES
dc.description.references Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0206-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295 es_ES
dc.description.references Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739. doi:10.1056/nejm199612053352305 es_ES
dc.description.references Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694-707. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 101-118. doi:10.1080/10438590600982830 es_ES
dc.description.references Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data Withholding in Academic Genetics. JAMA, 287(4), 473. doi:10.1001/jama.287.4.473 es_ES
dc.description.references Campbell, E. G., Weissman, J. S., Causino, N., & Blumenthal, D. (2000). Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Research Policy, 29(2), 303-312. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00068-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Campbell, T. I. D., & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and Administrators’ Attitudes toward Potential Conflicts of Interest, Commitment, and Equity in University-Industry Relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(3), 309. doi:10.2307/2649199 es_ES
dc.description.references Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2006). Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61-84. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9046-0 es_ES
dc.description.references D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2010). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z es_ES
dc.description.references Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321-342. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Dechenaux, E., Thursby, M., & Thursby, J. (2009). Shirking, sharing risk and shelving: The role of university license contracts. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(1), 80-91. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.05.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349-367. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Dodgson, M. (1992). The strategic management of R&D collaboration. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 4(3), 227-244. doi:10.1080/09537329208524096 es_ES
dc.description.references Elzinga, A. (1997). The science-society contract in historical transformation: with special reference to «epistemic drift». Social Science Information, 36(3), 411-445. doi:10.1177/053901897036003002 es_ES
dc.description.references Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00069-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2004). Truth for Its Own Sake: Academic Culture and Technology Transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva, 42(2), 105-126. doi:10.1023/b:mine.0000030019.99709.a0 es_ES
dc.description.references Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39(8), 1060-1069. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240-259. doi:10.1257/aer.91.1.240 es_ES
dc.description.references Jong, S. (2006). How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 251-283. doi:10.1093/icc/dtj014 es_ES
dc.description.references Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 es_ES
dc.description.references Landry, R., Amara, N., & Saïhi, M. (2006). Patenting and spin-off creation by Canadian researchers in engineering and life sciences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 217-249. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9018-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843-863. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00857-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, Y. S. (2000). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111-133. doi:10.1023/a:1007895322042 es_ES
dc.description.references Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641-655. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm020 es_ES
dc.description.references Louis, K. S., Jones, L. M., Anderson, M. S., Blumenthal, D., & Campbell, E. G. (2001). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 233-245. doi:10.1023/a:1011106006976 es_ES
dc.description.references Mansfield, E., & Lee, J.-Y. (1996). The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25(7), 1047-1058. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00893-1 es_ES
dc.description.references McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91-103. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814 es_ES
dc.description.references Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635. doi:10.2307/2089193 es_ES
dc.description.references Moutinho, P. S. F., Fontes, M., & Godinho, M. M. (2007). Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations. Scientometrics, 70(2), 355-377. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0207-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 99-114. doi:10.1023/a:1007892413701 es_ES
dc.description.references Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619-632. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::aid-jae418>3.0.co;2-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Polanyi, M. (2000). Minerva, 38(1), 1-21. doi:10.1023/a:1026591624255 es_ES
dc.description.references Ponomariov, B., & Craig Boardman, P. (2007). The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 301-313. doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9029-z es_ES
dc.description.references Reskin, B. F. (1977). Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science. American Sociological Review, 42(3), 491. doi:10.2307/2094753 es_ES
dc.description.references Rosenberg, N. (1991). Critical issues in science policy research. Science and Public Policy, 18(6), 335-346. doi:10.1093/spp/18.6.335 es_ES
dc.description.references Sako, M., & Helper, S. (1998). Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(3), 387-417. doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00082-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Santoro, M. D., & Saparito, P. A. (2003). The firm’s trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 362-373. doi:10.1109/tem.2003.817287 es_ES
dc.description.references Shane, S. (2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602 es_ES
dc.description.references Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144. doi:10.1086/502691 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K., & Engelen, B. (1990). University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it? Research Policy, 19(6), 551-566. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(90)90012-u es_ES
dc.description.references Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.141 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem