- -

Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Marqués;Segura;Maroto ...
Tamaño: 101.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Marqués Pérez, Inmaculada es_ES
dc.contributor.author Segura García del Río, Baldomero es_ES
dc.contributor.author Maroto Álvarez, Mª Concepción es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-11-11T10:24:52Z
dc.date.available 2016-11-11T10:24:52Z
dc.date.issued 2014-12
dc.identifier.issn 1695-971X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/73835
dc.description.abstract The debate on the multifunctionality of agriculture and its connections with territorial policies are the basis of the most appropriate approach to legitimize public interventions in the agricultural sector. The main obstacle of this public intervention is to know the goods and services provided by agricultural systems and elicitation of the social preferences for them. We created a descriptive approach for the multifunctionality of agricultural systems that is based on the review of the scientific literature focused on multifunctionality and the goods and services of agricultural systems. The review shows a large variety of activities and approaches, which can be grouped by their economic dimension, social dimension and environmental dimension. Multicriteria techniques, such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), can help elicit the priorities and the relative importance of different functions attributed by the society as a whole. The authorities can take into account these results to inform and support their political decisions. This paper describes a methodological approach to determine the Social Welfare Function by using AHP. The proposed methodology is applied to the Huerta de Valencia , a rich peri-urban agricultural system with a variety of resources, around which there is an open political-institutional debate to define a protection scheme. The results are very interesting and useful to enrich this debate. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors acknowledge the support received from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research project "Multiple Criteria and Group Decision Making integrated into Sustainable Management" (Ref. ECO2011-27369). en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Public goods es_ES
dc.subject Ecosystem services es_ES
dc.subject Social optimum es_ES
dc.subject Analytic Hierarchy Process es_ES
dc.subject Priorities es_ES
dc.subject Consistency es_ES
dc.subject Social utility function es_ES
dc.subject Eigenvector. es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA, SOCIOLOGIA Y POLITICA AGRARIA es_ES
dc.title Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2011-27369/ES/TECNICAS MULTICRITERIO Y TOMA DE DECISIONES PARTICIPATIVA PARA UNA GESTION SOSTENIBLE/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas - Facultat d'Administració i Direcció d'Empreses es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y del Medio Natural - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria Agronòmica i del Medi Natural es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Marqués Pérez, I.; Segura García Del Río, B.; Maroto Álvarez, MC. (2014). Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 12(4):889-901. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 889 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 901 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 12 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 281479 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.description.references Abbler D, 2001. A synthesis of country reports on jointness between commodity and non commodity outputs in OECD agriculture. Workshop on Multifunctionality Vol 2(3), Paris, France. es_ES
dc.description.references Aczél, J., & Saaty, T. L. (1983). Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27(1), 93-102. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Aull-Hyde, R., Erdogan, S., & Duke, J. M. (2006). An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 290-295. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.037 es_ES
dc.description.references Aznar J, Estruch V, 2007. Valoración de activos ambientales mediante métodos multicriterio. Aplicación a la valoración del Parque Natural del Alto Tajo. Econ Agrar Recurs Nat 7(13): 107-125. es_ES
dc.description.references de Blaeij A, Linderhof V, Polman N, Reinhard S, 2009. Social preferences for exploiting commercial wetlands. Conf on Economic Instruments to Enhance the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity. Venice (Italia). es_ES
dc.description.references Duke, J. M., & Aull-Hyde, R. (2002). Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics, 42(1-2), 131-145. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00053-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Easley, R. F., Valacich, J. S., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2000). Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision. European Journal of Operational Research, 125(1), 73-83. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00196-4 es_ES
dc.description.references EC, 1999. Safeguarding the multifunctional role of agriculture: which instruments? Info paper. European Commission DGVI A II 1. Info-Paper. Brussels, Belgium. September. es_ES
dc.description.references Forman E, Peniwati K, 1998. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierachy process. Eur J Oper Res 9: 108-165. es_ES
dc.description.references Gómez-Limón J, Barreiros J, 2007. La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura en Espa-a. In: La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura en Espa-a. Eumedia, Madrid (Spain), pp: 9-16. es_ES
dc.description.references Gómez-Navarro, T., García-Melón, M., Acuña-Dutra, S., & Díaz-Martín, D. (2009). An environmental pressure index proposal for urban development planning based on the analytic network process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(5), 319-329. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.10.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Gómez-Orea D, 2001. Agricultura y medio ambiente. In: El sector agrario y agroalimentario de Almería ante el siglo XXI: evolución y perspectiva de nuestra agricultura en el a-o 2000. Producción integrada: incidencia de las nuevas normativas de residuos de plaguicidas sobre la horticultura almeriense. Instituto de Estudios Almerienses, pp: 143-162. es_ES
dc.description.references Gómez-Villarino T, Gómez-Orea D, 2012. Agricultura y medio ambiente: en pos del desarrollo sostenible. UFLO Calidad de Vida 7: 3-22. es_ES
dc.description.references Hall, C., McVittie, A., & Moran, D. (2004). What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(2), 211-225. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.08.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 3578-3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Ishizaka A, Labib A, 2011. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl 38: 14336-14345. es_ES
dc.description.references Kallas Z, Gómez-Limón J, Barreiro J, 2007. Oferta y demanda de bienes y servicios públicos de la agricultura espa-ola. In: La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura en Espa-a. Eumedia, Madrid (Spain), pp: 131-153. es_ES
dc.description.references Madureira, L., Rambonilaza, T., & Karpinski, I. (2007). Review of methods and evidence for economic valuation of agricultural non-commodity outputs and suggestions to facilitate its application to broader decisional contexts. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120(1), 5-20. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.04.015 es_ES
dc.description.references Maroto Álvarez, C., Segura, M., Ginestar, C., Uriol, J., & Segura, B. (2013). Sustainable Forest Management in a Mediterranean region: Social preferences. Forest Systems, 22(3), 546. doi:10.5424/fs/2013223-04135 es_ES
dc.description.references Mesa P, Martín-Ortega J, Berbel J, 2008. Análisis multicriterio de preferencias sociales en gestión hídrica bajo la DMA. Econ Agrar Recurs Nat 8(2): 105-1026. es_ES
dc.description.references Moyano E, 2008. Multifuncionalidad, territorio y desarrollo de las areas rurales. Ambienta 81: 7-19. es_ES
dc.description.references Nordström, E.-M., Eriksson, L. O., & Öhman, K. (2010). Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(8), 562-574. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Parra-López, C., Calatrava-Requena, J., & de-Haro-Giménez, T. (2008). A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 820-834. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Ramanathan, R. (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(1), 27-35. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0455 es_ES
dc.description.references Reig E, 2007. Fundamentos económicos de la multifuncionalidad. In: La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura espa-ola. Eumedia Madrid (Spain), pp: 19-39. es_ES
dc.description.references Reig E, 2008. Agricultura, desarrollo rural y sostenibilidad medioambiental. Ciriec 61: 103-126. es_ES
dc.description.references Ríos V, Díaz L, Romero C, 1998. Economía y gestión ambiental: un enfoque decisional multicriterio. Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 92(4): 399-408. es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty T, 1997. Toma de decisiones para líderes: El proceso analítico jerárquico, la toma de decisiones en un mundo complejo. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA. es_ES
dc.description.references SAATY, T. L., & VARGAS, L. G. (2005). THE POSSIBILITY OF GROUP WELFARE FUNCTIONS. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 04(02), 167-176. doi:10.1142/s0219622005001453 es_ES
dc.description.references Silva Pérez, R. (2010). Multifuncionalidad agraria y territorio: Algunas reflexiones y propuestas de análisis. EURE (Santiago), 36(109), 5-33. doi:10.4067/s0250-71612010000300001 es_ES
dc.description.references Sólnes, J. (2003). Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(3), 283-303. doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00004-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Tió C, Atance I, 2000. La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura: aspectos económicos e implicaciones sobre política agraria. Estud Agrosoc Pesqu 189: 29-48. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Huylenbroeck G, Vandermeulen V, Mettepenningen E, Verspecht A, 2007. Multifuntionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 1(3): 1-43. es_ES
dc.description.references Whitmarsh, D., & Palmieri, M. G. (2009). Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: The use of survey-based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences. Marine Policy, 33(3), 452-457. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.10.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Wiggering H, Müller F, Werner A, Helming K, 2003. The concept of multifuncionality in sustainable land development. In: Sustainable Land Development. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp: 3-18. es_ES
dc.description.references Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 639-648. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem