Cebolla, V.; Busto, J.; Ferrer, A.; Miguel Gómez, A.; Maroto Borrego, JV. (2000). Methyl bromide alternatives on horticultural crops. Acta Horticulturae. 532:237-242. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.532.32
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/78441
Título:
|
Methyl bromide alternatives on horticultural crops
|
Autor:
|
Cebolla, Vicent
Busto, Julia
Ferrer, Amparo
Miguel Gómez, Alfredo
Maroto Borrego, José Vicente
|
Entidad UPV:
|
Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Producción Vegetal - Departament de Producció Vegetal
|
Fecha difusión:
|
|
Resumen:
|
[EN] A very intensive crop rotation, with three to four crops per year, typical in Valencia,
frequently includes the earth almond Cyperus sculentus (Xufa) that acts as a real weed for
the next crop. Methyl bromide (MB) ...[+]
[EN] A very intensive crop rotation, with three to four crops per year, typical in Valencia,
frequently includes the earth almond Cyperus sculentus (Xufa) that acts as a real weed for
the next crop. Methyl bromide (MB) is the preferred fumigant to control both diseases
and weeds in this kind of rotation.
The crop rotation begun by an escarole crop (September to January), followed by potato
(February to May) and watermelon (May to August).
Disinfestation treatments to compare were: 1) Non fumigated control; 2) Standard MB
polyethylene (PE) 60g/ m2 ; 3) MB VIF 30g/ m2; 4) Solarization + Manure 5Kg/ m2; 5)
Solarization + MS (N-Methyl Dithiocarbamate Sodic 40% p/v) 36g/ m2; 6) Telone C35
Mechanical application 40g/ m2; 7) Telone II (1,3-Dichloropropene 93%p/p)18g/ m2 +
MS 108g/m2
All treatments are rather effective in controlling weeds when compared to the non treated
control, the increase in cost of removing weeds is particularly high if none treatment is
applied.
Only the escarole crop suffered the attack of Scleotinia minar and treatments 2 and 7 gave
a very good protection as is revealed by a low percent of debris.
No specific pathogens were found in potato and watermelon crops, nevertheless grafting
is confirmed as a very good technique that increases the yield of watermelon.
Solarization treatments did not differ significantly from control in this experiment.
Treatment 7 is as good as MB in sorne of the instances, but disinfestation with MB is
absolutely necessary if non grafted plants of watermelon are employed.
[-]
|
Palabras clave:
|
Disinfestation
,
Solarization
,
Manure
,
Metham-Na
,
1.3-Dichloropropene
,
Chloropicrin
,
Weeds
,
Yield
,
Endive
,
Potato
,
Watermelon
,
Solanum tuberosum
,
Cichorium endivia
,
Citrullus vulgaris
,
Cyperus sculentus
|
Derechos de uso:
|
Cerrado |
Fuente:
|
Acta Horticulturae. (issn:
0567-7572
) (eissn:
2406-6168
)
|
DOI:
|
10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.532.32
|
Editorial:
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
|
Versión del editor:
|
http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.532.32
|
Título del congreso:
|
International Symposium on Chemical and Non-Chemical Soil and Substrate Disinfectation
|
Lugar del congreso:
|
Grugliasco (Torino), Italy
|
Fecha congreso:
|
September 11-15, 2000
|
Código del Proyecto:
|
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//IVIA 5706/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI//INIA SC 97-130/ES/Alternativas al uso convencional del Bromuro de Metilo respetuosas con el medio ambiente y viables económicamente
|
Agradecimientos:
|
This research has been funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Spain, project INIA SC 97-130 and Conselleria Agricultura, Valencia, Spain project IVIA 5706
|
Tipo:
|
Artículo
Comunicación en congreso
|