- -

Methyl bromide alternatives on horticultural crops

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Methyl bromide alternatives on horticultural crops

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Cebolla, Vicent es_ES
dc.contributor.author Busto, Julia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ferrer, Amparo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Miguel Gómez, Alfredo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Maroto Borrego, José Vicente es_ES
dc.coverage.spatial east=-0.7532808999999361; north=39.4840108; name=Xiva, 46370, València, Espanya
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-02T10:10:33Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-02T10:10:33Z
dc.date.issued 2000-09-01
dc.identifier.issn 0567-7572
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/78441
dc.description.abstract [EN] A very intensive crop rotation, with three to four crops per year, typical in Valencia, frequently includes the earth almond Cyperus sculentus (Xufa) that acts as a real weed for the next crop. Methyl bromide (MB) is the preferred fumigant to control both diseases and weeds in this kind of rotation. The crop rotation begun by an escarole crop (September to January), followed by potato (February to May) and watermelon (May to August). Disinfestation treatments to compare were: 1) Non fumigated control; 2) Standard MB polyethylene (PE) 60g/ m2 ; 3) MB VIF 30g/ m2; 4) Solarization + Manure 5Kg/ m2; 5) Solarization + MS (N-Methyl Dithiocarbamate Sodic 40% p/v) 36g/ m2; 6) Telone C35 Mechanical application 40g/ m2; 7) Telone II (1,3-Dichloropropene 93%p/p)18g/ m2 + MS 108g/m2 All treatments are rather effective in controlling weeds when compared to the non treated control, the increase in cost of removing weeds is particularly high if none treatment is applied. Only the escarole crop suffered the attack of Scleotinia minar and treatments 2 and 7 gave a very good protection as is revealed by a low percent of debris. No specific pathogens were found in potato and watermelon crops, nevertheless grafting is confirmed as a very good technique that increases the yield of watermelon. Solarization treatments did not differ significantly from control in this experiment. Treatment 7 is as good as MB in sorne of the instances, but disinfestation with MB is absolutely necessary if non grafted plants of watermelon are employed. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research has been funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Spain, project INIA SC 97-130 and Conselleria Agricultura, Valencia, Spain project IVIA 5706
dc.format.extent 6 es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Acta Horticulturae es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Disinfestation es_ES
dc.subject Solarization es_ES
dc.subject Manure es_ES
dc.subject Metham-Na es_ES
dc.subject 1.3-Dichloropropene es_ES
dc.subject Chloropicrin es_ES
dc.subject Weeds es_ES
dc.subject Yield es_ES
dc.subject Endive es_ES
dc.subject Potato es_ES
dc.subject Watermelon es_ES
dc.subject Solanum tuberosum es_ES
dc.subject Cichorium endivia es_ES
dc.subject Citrullus vulgaris es_ES
dc.subject Cyperus sculentus es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION VEGETAL es_ES
dc.title Methyl bromide alternatives on horticultural crops es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.type Comunicación en congreso es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.532.32
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//IVIA 5706/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI//INIA SC 97-130/ES/Alternativas al uso convencional del Bromuro de Metilo respetuosas con el medio ambiente y viables económicamente es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Producción Vegetal - Departament de Producció Vegetal es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Cebolla, V.; Busto, J.; Ferrer, A.; Miguel Gómez, A.; Maroto Borrego, JV. (2000). Methyl bromide alternatives on horticultural crops. Acta Horticulturae. 532:237-242. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.532.32 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.conferencename International Symposium on Chemical and Non-Chemical Soil and Substrate Disinfectation es_ES
dc.relation.conferencedate September 11-15, 2000 es_ES
dc.relation.conferenceplace Grugliasco (Torino), Italy es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.532.32 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 237 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 242 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 532 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 17486 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2406-6168
dc.contributor.funder Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem