- -

Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist?

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist?

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Access to universities ...
Tamaño: 342.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro ...
Tamaño: 304.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Azagra Caro, Joaquín María es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-20T08:40:17Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-20T08:40:17Z
dc.date.issued 2012-06
dc.identifier.issn 0138-9130
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/85521
dc.description.abstract [EN] Access to public knowledge is a prerequisite for the good functioning of developed economies. Universities strive and are also requested to contribute to this knowledge both locally and internationally. Traditional studies on the geography of knowledge flows have identified a localisation effect; however, these studies do not use the country as the unit of observation and hence do not explore national patterns. In this paper, we hypothesise that the localisation of university knowledge flows is directly related to share of firm expenditure on research and development. To test this hypothesis, we use references to universities in patent documents as indicators based on a data set of around 20,000 university references, for 37 countries in the period 1990–2007, resulting in panels of around 300–500 observations. We build indicators for the university knowledge flows both inside and outside the applicant country, which we explain as a function of some proxies for national size and research structure based on econometric estimations. We draw some conclusions as to the importance of national business scientific strength for fostering increased domestic university knowledge flows. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research was initiated with the framework of ERAWATCH, a joint initiative of the European Commission's Directorate General for Research and the Joint Research Centre-Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS). The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission (EC). Neither the EC nor anyone acting on behalf of the EC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information. I am grateful to Rene van Bavel and Xabier Goenaga for their support and to Laura de Dominicis for exchange of ideas. I am also grateful to the international consortium that produced the database, including Henry Etzkowitz, Marina Ranga and members of Incentim and CWTS, led, respectively, by Bart Van Looy and Robert J.W. Tijssen. Previous versions of the paper were presented at the Triple Helix VIII International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages and the IPTS Workshop "The Output of R&D activities: Harnessing the Power of Patents Data-II'', and I acknowledge helpful comments from the audiences. My colleagues at INGENIO also provided useful comments on a seminar presentation. I also gratefully acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the Spanish National Research Council to the project "Access to the public knowledge base'' (ref. 201010I004). en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Akadémia Kiadó es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Netherlands es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Scientometrics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge flows es_ES
dc.subject R&D expenditure es_ES
dc.subject Universities es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist? es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11192-012-0629-5
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/256314/EU/ERAWATCH International Monitoring and Analysis/
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CSIC//201010I004/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Azagra Caro, JM. (2012). Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist?. Scientometrics. 91(3):671-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0629-5 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0629-5 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 671 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 679 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 91 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 213437 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas es_ES
dc.description.references Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2010). Assessing public–private research collaboration: Is it possible to compare university performance? Scientometrics, 84, 173–197. es_ES
dc.description.references Acosta, M., & Coronado, D. (2003). Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents. Research Policy, 32(10), 1783–1803. es_ES
dc.description.references Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87, 63–74. es_ES
dc.description.references Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 571–591. es_ES
dc.description.references Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., & McHale, J. (2008). How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 258–269. es_ES
dc.description.references Alcácer, J., & Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measurement of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774–779. es_ES
dc.description.references Alcácer, J., Gittelman, M., & Sampat, B. (2009). Applicant and examiner citations in US patents: An overview and analysis. Research Policy, 38(2), 415–427. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Perruchas, F., & Mattsson, P. (2009). What do patent examiner inserted citations indicate for a region with low absorptive capacity? Scientometrics, 80(2), 441–455. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Pontikakis, D., & Varga, A. (2011). Delocalisation patterns in university–industry interaction: Evidence from the 6th R&D framework programme. European Planning Studies, forthcoming. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Yegros–Yegros, A., & Archontakis, F. (2006). What do university patent routes indicate at regional level? Scientometrics, 66(1), 219–230. es_ES
dc.description.references Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. es_ES
dc.description.references Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2005). Knowledge networks from patent data. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 613–643). Dordrecht: Kluwer es_ES
dc.description.references Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Shumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (ch. 6). Londres and Washington: Pinter. es_ES
dc.description.references Callaert, J., van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thus, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3–20. es_ES
dc.description.references Criscuolo, P., & Verspagen, B. (2008). Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37(10), 1892–1908. es_ES
dc.description.references EC (2007). Commission Green Paper ‘The European Research Area: New Perspectives’, COM(2007) p. 161. es_ES
dc.description.references Feldman, M. P. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1), 5–25. es_ES
dc.description.references Greene, W. H. (2002). LIMDEP Version 8.0 econometric modeling guide 2. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc. es_ES
dc.description.references Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30, 1253–1266. es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, A. G. Z., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6), 849–880. es_ES
dc.description.references Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1996). Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12671–12677. es_ES
dc.description.references Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1), 105–136. es_ES
dc.description.references Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. es_ES
dc.description.references Lecocq, C., & Van Looy, B. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the technological performance of regions: Time invariant or driven by life cycle dynamics? Scientometrics, 80(3), 847–867. es_ES
dc.description.references Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531–545. es_ES
dc.description.references Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434. es_ES
dc.description.references Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373. es_ES
dc.description.references Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369–388. es_ES
dc.description.references Ponds, R. (2009). The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 76–94. es_ES
dc.description.references Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306. es_ES
dc.description.references Sapsalis, E., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2007). The institutional sources of knowledge and the value of academic patents. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 139–157. es_ES
dc.description.references Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770. es_ES
dc.description.references Sonn, J. W., & Storper, M. (2008). The increasing importance of geographical proximity in technological innovation: An analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environment and Planning, 40(5), 1020–1039. es_ES
dc.description.references Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35–54. es_ES
dc.description.references Tijssen, R. J. W., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006). Measuring impacts of academic science on industrial research: A citation-based approach. Scientometrics, 66(1), 55–69. es_ES
dc.description.references Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Luwel, M. (2003). Science cited in patents: A geographic “flow” analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents. Scientometrics, 58(2), 241–263. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem