- -

Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist?

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist?

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Azagra Caro, JM. (2012). Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist?. Scientometrics. 91(3):671-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0629-5

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/85521

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Access to universities public knowledge: Who s more nationalist?
Autor: Azagra Caro, Joaquín María
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Access to public knowledge is a prerequisite for the good functioning of developed economies. Universities strive and are also requested to contribute to this knowledge both locally and internationally. Traditional ...[+]
Palabras clave: Knowledge flows , R&D expenditure , Universities
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
Scientometrics. (issn: 0138-9130 )
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0629-5
Editorial:
Akadémia Kiadó
Springer Netherlands
Versión del editor: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0629-5
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/256314/EU/ERAWATCH International Monitoring and Analysis/
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CSIC//201010I004/
Agradecimientos:
This research was initiated with the framework of ERAWATCH, a joint initiative of the European Commission's Directorate General for Research and the Joint Research Centre-Institute for Prospective Technological Studies ...[+]
Tipo: Artículo

References

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2010). Assessing public–private research collaboration: Is it possible to compare university performance? Scientometrics, 84, 173–197.

Acosta, M., & Coronado, D. (2003). Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents. Research Policy, 32(10), 1783–1803.

Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87, 63–74. [+]
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2010). Assessing public–private research collaboration: Is it possible to compare university performance? Scientometrics, 84, 173–197.

Acosta, M., & Coronado, D. (2003). Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents. Research Policy, 32(10), 1783–1803.

Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87, 63–74.

Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 571–591.

Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., & McHale, J. (2008). How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 258–269.

Alcácer, J., & Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measurement of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774–779.

Alcácer, J., Gittelman, M., & Sampat, B. (2009). Applicant and examiner citations in US patents: An overview and analysis. Research Policy, 38(2), 415–427.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Perruchas, F., & Mattsson, P. (2009). What do patent examiner inserted citations indicate for a region with low absorptive capacity? Scientometrics, 80(2), 441–455.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Pontikakis, D., & Varga, A. (2011). Delocalisation patterns in university–industry interaction: Evidence from the 6th R&D framework programme. European Planning Studies, forthcoming.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Yegros–Yegros, A., & Archontakis, F. (2006). What do university patent routes indicate at regional level? Scientometrics, 66(1), 219–230.

Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005.

Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2005). Knowledge networks from patent data. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 613–643). Dordrecht: Kluwer

Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Shumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (ch. 6). Londres and Washington: Pinter.

Callaert, J., van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thus, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3–20.

Criscuolo, P., & Verspagen, B. (2008). Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37(10), 1892–1908.

EC (2007). Commission Green Paper ‘The European Research Area: New Perspectives’, COM(2007) p. 161.

Feldman, M. P. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1), 5–25.

Greene, W. H. (2002). LIMDEP Version 8.0 econometric modeling guide 2. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc.

Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 30, 1253–1266.

Hu, A. G. Z., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6), 849–880.

Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1996). Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12671–12677.

Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1), 105–136.

Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

Lecocq, C., & Van Looy, B. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the technological performance of regions: Time invariant or driven by life cycle dynamics? Scientometrics, 80(3), 847–867.

Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531–545.

Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434.

Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.

Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369–388.

Ponds, R. (2009). The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 76–94.

Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306.

Sapsalis, E., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2007). The institutional sources of knowledge and the value of academic patents. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 139–157.

Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770.

Sonn, J. W., & Storper, M. (2008). The increasing importance of geographical proximity in technological innovation: An analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environment and Planning, 40(5), 1020–1039.

Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35–54.

Tijssen, R. J. W., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006). Measuring impacts of academic science on industrial research: A citation-based approach. Scientometrics, 66(1), 55–69.

Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Luwel, M. (2003). Science cited in patents: A geographic “flow” analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents. Scientometrics, 58(2), 241–263.

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem