- -

Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation

Show full item record

Azagra Caro, JM.; Consoli, D. (2016). Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation. Journal of Technology Transfer. 41(1):152-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/85525

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation
Author: Azagra Caro, Joaquín María Consoli, Davide
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] This paper analyses country-specific determinants of knowledge flows with a view to uncover the role of cross-organizational interactions. Using a sample of some 600,000 patents from the EU27 member states in the ...[+]
Subjects: Knowledge flows , National innovative capacity , Patents , Citations
Copyrigths: Reserva de todos los derechos
Source:
Journal of Technology Transfer. (issn: 0892-9912 ) (eissn: 1573-7047 )
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7
Publisher:
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7
Project ID:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV%2F2012%2F018/
Thanks:
Marina Ranga participated in the brainstorming that led to this paper and the thorough revision of an earlier version. Catalina Martinez provided us with data to update the database. Both reviewed a previous version of the ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: start-up firms in the semiconductor industry. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31.

Antonelli, C. (2008). Localised technological change: Towards the economics of complexity. London: Taylor & Francis.

Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173. [+]
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: start-up firms in the semiconductor industry. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31.

Antonelli, C. (2008). Localised technological change: Towards the economics of complexity. London: Taylor & Francis.

Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.

Azagra-Caro, J. M. (2014). Determinants of national patent ownership by public research organisations and universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(6), 898–914.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Perruchas, F., & Mattsson, P. (2009). What do patent examiner inserted citations indicate for a region with low absorptive capacity? Scientometrics, 80(2), 441–455.

Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2009). Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 169–181.

Balzat, M., & Hanusch, H. (2004). Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2), 197–210.

Belderbos, R., Cassiman, B., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Van Looy, B. (2013). Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners. Research Policy,. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013 .

Branstetter, L. (1998). Looking for international knowledge spillovers: a review of the literature with suggestion for new approaches. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 49–50, 517–540.

Buesa, M., Baumert, T., Heijs, J., & Martínez, M. (2002). Los factores determinantes de la innovación: un análisis econométrico sobre las regiones españolas. Economía Industrial, 347, 67–84.

Callaert, J., Du Plessis, M., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2013). The impact of academic technology: Do modes of involvement matter? The Flemish Case. Industry and Innovation, 20(5), 456–472.

Callaert, J., van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thus, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3–20.

De Backer, K., López-Bassols, V. & Martinez, C. (2008). Open innovation in a global perspective: What do existing data tell us?, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2008/04, OECD Publishing.

De Bresson, C., & Amesse, F. (1991). Networks of innovators: A review and introduction to the issue. Research Policy, 20(1991), 363–379.

Dinges, M., Berger, M., Frietsch, R., & Kaloudis, A. (2007). Monitoring sector specialisation of public and private funded business research and development. Science and Public Policy, 34(6), 431–443.

Doyle, E., & Connor, F. O. (2013). Innovation capacities in advanced economies: Relative performance of small open economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 27, 106–123.

European Commission (EC, 2002). The Lisbon strategy—Making change happen. Brussels: European Commission COM(2002)14 final.

Fier, H., & Pyka, A. (2014). Against the one-way-street: Analyzing knowledge transfer from industry to science. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 219–246.

Fisch, C. O., Hassel, T. M., Sandner, P. G., & Block, J. H. (2014). University patenting: A comparison of 300 leading universities worldwide. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9355-x .

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy, 33, 1329–1354.

Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899–933.

Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37, 41–58.

Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29–47.

Hall, B. H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.

Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.

Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363.

Howells, J. (2000). Research and technology outsourcing and systems of innovation. In J. S. Metcalfe & I. Miles (Eds.), Innovation systems in the service economy (pp. 271–295). New York: Springer.

Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34, 1322–1349.

Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2008). China’s national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37, 1465–1479.

Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

Kamiyama, S., Sheehan, J. & Martinez, C. (2006). Valuation and exploitation of intellectual property, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2006/05, OECD Publishing.

Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington: National Academy Press.

Lecocq, C., Song, X., Vereyen, C., Du Plessis, M., & Van Looy, B. (2008). Data production methods for harmonized patent statistics: Regionalizing patent data—EU-27: Methodological outline. Sogeti-Incentim, mimeo.

Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(7), 773–776.

Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330.

Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

OECD. (1998). Technology, productivity and job creation: Best policy practices. Paris: OECD.

Porter, M. E. (1990). New global strategies for competitive advantage. Strategy & Leadership, 18(3), 4–14.

Quatraro, F., & Usai, F. (2014). Are knowledge flows all alike? Evidence from European regions. Contributi di Ricerca CRENoS, 2014/05. Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.

Roach, M., & Cohen, W. M. (2013). Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Science, 59(2), 504–525.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.

Saint-George, M., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2013). A quality index for patent systems. Research Policy, 42, 704–719.

Sapir, A. (chairman) (2003). An agenda for a growing Europe: Making the EU economic system deliver. Report of an independent high level study group established on the initiative of the president of the European Commission.

Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Frölich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303–328.

Stevens, H., Van Overwalle, G., Van Looy, B., & Huys, I. (2013). Perspectives and opportunities for precompetitive public–private partnerships in the biomedical sector. Biotechnology Law Report, 32(3), 131–139.

Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30, 35–54.

Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33, 425–441.

Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82–100.

Yang, H., Phelps, C., & Steensma, H. K. (2010). Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 371–389.

[-]

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record