- -

Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Knowledge flows_the ...
Tamaño: 423.6Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Joaquín M. Azagra ...
Tamaño: 879.6Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Azagra Caro, Joaquín María es_ES
dc.contributor.author Consoli, Davide es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-20T09:04:17Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-20T09:04:17Z
dc.date.issued 2016-02
dc.identifier.issn 0892-9912
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/85525
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper analyses country-specific determinants of knowledge flows with a view to uncover the role of cross-organizational interactions. Using a sample of some 600,000 patents from the EU27 member states in the period 1990-2007, we take backward citations as dependent variable and find that technological sophistication and research size have a positive effect on knowledge flows. While a national bias towards applied research and development has a negative impact, individual public-private cooperation has a moderating effect due to the generation of scientific knowledge by public institutions. The present study contributes to the debate concerning the direction of R&D investments and provides empirical support to policies aimed at the enhancement of public-private cooperation. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Marina Ranga participated in the brainstorming that led to this paper and the thorough revision of an earlier version. Catalina Martinez provided us with data to update the database. Both reviewed a previous version of the manuscript. Anabel Fernandez-Mesa, Alberto Marzucchi and Francesco Rentocchini helped with the econometric estimations. Richard Woolley shared insights on the structural composition of research expenditure. Elena M. Tur and Francois Perruchas offered technical assistance. The research was carried out with funding from project GV/2012/018 of the Valencian Regional Government. Previous versions of the paper were presented at the 2013 Eu-SPRI Forum Conference, the 2013 ISSI Conference and the 2013 IPTS Workshop on 'Harnessing the Powers of Patent Data'. The authors acknowledge helpful comments from the audiences, especially Jorge Niosi and Julio Raffo. Joaquin M. Azagra-Caro is grateful to Rene van Bavel and Xabier Goenaga for their institutional support, and to the international consortium that produced the database, especially Henry Etzkowitz, Marina Ranga and members of Incentim and CWTS, led, respectively, by Bart Van Looy and Robert J.W. Tijssen. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Technology Transfer es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge flows es_ES
dc.subject National innovative capacity es_ES
dc.subject Patents es_ES
dc.subject Citations es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV%2F2012%2F018/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Azagra Caro, JM.; Consoli, D. (2016). Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public-private cooperation. Journal of Technology Transfer. 41(1):152-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 152 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 172 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 41 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 310752 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1573-7047
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.description.references Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: start-up firms in the semiconductor industry. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31. es_ES
dc.description.references Antonelli, C. (2008). Localised technological change: Towards the economics of complexity. London: Taylor & Francis. es_ES
dc.description.references Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M. (2014). Determinants of national patent ownership by public research organisations and universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(6), 898–914. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Perruchas, F., & Mattsson, P. (2009). What do patent examiner inserted citations indicate for a region with low absorptive capacity? Scientometrics, 80(2), 441–455. es_ES
dc.description.references Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2009). Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 169–181. es_ES
dc.description.references Balzat, M., & Hanusch, H. (2004). Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2), 197–210. es_ES
dc.description.references Belderbos, R., Cassiman, B., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Van Looy, B. (2013). Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners. Research Policy,. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013 . es_ES
dc.description.references Branstetter, L. (1998). Looking for international knowledge spillovers: a review of the literature with suggestion for new approaches. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 49–50, 517–540. es_ES
dc.description.references Buesa, M., Baumert, T., Heijs, J., & Martínez, M. (2002). Los factores determinantes de la innovación: un análisis econométrico sobre las regiones españolas. Economía Industrial, 347, 67–84. es_ES
dc.description.references Callaert, J., Du Plessis, M., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2013). The impact of academic technology: Do modes of involvement matter? The Flemish Case. Industry and Innovation, 20(5), 456–472. es_ES
dc.description.references Callaert, J., van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thus, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3–20. es_ES
dc.description.references De Backer, K., López-Bassols, V. & Martinez, C. (2008). Open innovation in a global perspective: What do existing data tell us?, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2008/04, OECD Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references De Bresson, C., & Amesse, F. (1991). Networks of innovators: A review and introduction to the issue. Research Policy, 20(1991), 363–379. es_ES
dc.description.references Dinges, M., Berger, M., Frietsch, R., & Kaloudis, A. (2007). Monitoring sector specialisation of public and private funded business research and development. Science and Public Policy, 34(6), 431–443. es_ES
dc.description.references Doyle, E., & Connor, F. O. (2013). Innovation capacities in advanced economies: Relative performance of small open economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 27, 106–123. es_ES
dc.description.references European Commission (EC, 2002). The Lisbon strategy—Making change happen. Brussels: European Commission COM(2002)14 final. es_ES
dc.description.references Fier, H., & Pyka, A. (2014). Against the one-way-street: Analyzing knowledge transfer from industry to science. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 219–246. es_ES
dc.description.references Fisch, C. O., Hassel, T. M., Sandner, P. G., & Block, J. H. (2014). University patenting: A comparison of 300 leading universities worldwide. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9355-x . es_ES
dc.description.references Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter. es_ES
dc.description.references Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy, 33, 1329–1354. es_ES
dc.description.references Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899–933. es_ES
dc.description.references Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37, 41–58. es_ES
dc.description.references Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29–47. es_ES
dc.description.references Hall, B. H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51. es_ES
dc.description.references Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38. es_ES
dc.description.references Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363. es_ES
dc.description.references Howells, J. (2000). Research and technology outsourcing and systems of innovation. In J. S. Metcalfe & I. Miles (Eds.), Innovation systems in the service economy (pp. 271–295). New York: Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34, 1322–1349. es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2008). China’s national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37, 1465–1479. es_ES
dc.description.references Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. es_ES
dc.description.references Kamiyama, S., Sheehan, J. & Martinez, C. (2006). Valuation and exploitation of intellectual property, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2006/05, OECD Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington: National Academy Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Lecocq, C., Song, X., Vereyen, C., Du Plessis, M., & Van Looy, B. (2008). Data production methods for harmonized patent statistics: Regionalizing patent data—EU-27: Methodological outline. Sogeti-Incentim, mimeo. es_ES
dc.description.references Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(7), 773–776. es_ES
dc.description.references Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330. es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306. es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD. (1998). Technology, productivity and job creation: Best policy practices. Paris: OECD. es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, M. E. (1990). New global strategies for competitive advantage. Strategy & Leadership, 18(3), 4–14. es_ES
dc.description.references Quatraro, F., & Usai, F. (2014). Are knowledge flows all alike? Evidence from European regions. Contributi di Ricerca CRENoS, 2014/05. Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia. es_ES
dc.description.references Roach, M., & Cohen, W. M. (2013). Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Science, 59(2), 504–525. es_ES
dc.description.references Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. es_ES
dc.description.references Saint-George, M., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2013). A quality index for patent systems. Research Policy, 42, 704–719. es_ES
dc.description.references Sapir, A. (chairman) (2003). An agenda for a growing Europe: Making the EU economic system deliver. Report of an independent high level study group established on the initiative of the president of the European Commission. es_ES
dc.description.references Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Frölich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303–328. es_ES
dc.description.references Stevens, H., Van Overwalle, G., Van Looy, B., & Huys, I. (2013). Perspectives and opportunities for precompetitive public–private partnerships in the biomedical sector. Biotechnology Law Report, 32(3), 131–139. es_ES
dc.description.references Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30, 35–54. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33, 425–441. es_ES
dc.description.references Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82–100. es_ES
dc.description.references Yang, H., Phelps, C., & Steensma, H. K. (2010). Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 371–389. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem