Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Fumero Pérez, María del Carmen | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Díaz Galán, Ana | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-27T08:56:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-27T08:56:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-07-11 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1886-2438 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/85865 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] The Functional Grammar Knowledge Base (FunGramKB), (Periñán-Pascual and Arcas-Túnez 2010) is a multipurpose lexico-conceptual knowledge base designed to be used in different Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. It is complemented with the ARTEMIS (Automatically Representing Text Meaning via an Interlingua–based System) application, a parsing device linguistically grounded on Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) that transduces natural language fragments into their corresponding grammatical and semantic structures. This paper unveils the different phases involved in its parsing routine, paying special attention to the treatment of argumental constructions. As an illustrative case, we will follow all the steps necessary to effectively parse a For-Benefactive structure within ARTEMIS. This methodology will reveal the necessity to distinguish between Kernel constructs and L1-constructions, since the latter involve a modification of the lexical template of the verb. Our definition of L1-constructions leads to the reorganization of the catalogue of FunGramKB L1-constructions, formerly based on Levin’s (1993) alternations. Accordingly, a rearrangement of the internal configuration of the L1-Constructicon within the Grammaticon is proposed. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Este trabajo ha sido desarrollado en el contexto del proyecto de investigación: “Desarrollo de un laboratorio virtual para el procesamiento computacional de la lengua desde un paradigma funcional”. (UNED) FF2014-53788-C3-1-P. | |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas | |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | FunGramKB | es_ES |
dc.subject | NLP | es_ES |
dc.subject | Parsing | es_ES |
dc.subject | ARTEMIS | es_ES |
dc.subject | Argumental Construction | es_ES |
dc.subject | Computational implementation of RRG | es_ES |
dc.title | The interaction of parsing rules and argument-predicate constructions: implications for the structure of the grammaticon in FunGramKB | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2017-07-27T07:34:48Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/rlyla.2017.5406 | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//FFI2014-53788-C3-1-P/ES/DESARROLLO DE UN LABORATORIO VIRTUAL PARA EL PROCESAMIENTO COMPUTACIONAL DEL LENGUAJE NATURAL DESDE UN PARADIGMA FUNCIONAL/ | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Fumero Pérez, MDC.; Díaz Galán, A. (2017). The interaction of parsing rules and argument-predicate constructions: implications for the structure of the grammaticon in FunGramKB. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 12:33-44. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.5406 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | SWORD | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.5406 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 33 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 44 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 12 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1886-6298 | |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | |
dc.description.references | Boas, H. and Sag, I. (2012). Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, Cal.: CSLI Publications. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ferrari, G. (2004). State of the art in Computational Linguistics. Linguistics Today – Facing a Greater Challenge, 163. doi:10.1075/z.126.09fer | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work: the Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Luzondo-Oyón, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez, F. J. (2015). Argument structure constructions in a Natural Language Processing environment. Language Sciences, 48, 70-89. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mairal Usón, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2009). Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. Deconstructing Constructions, 153-198. doi:10.1075/slcs.107.08lev | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Peri-án-Pascual, C. (2012). "En defensa del Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural Fundamentado en la Lingüística Teórica". ONOMÁZEIN, 26/2: 13-48. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Periñán-Pascual, C. (2013). Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics, 205-230. doi:10.1075/slcs.145.08per | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Peri-án-Pascual, C. and Arcas-Túnez, F. (2010). The Architecture of FungramKB. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2667-2674. Malta: European Language Resources Association. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Peri-án-Pascual, C. and Arcas-Túnez, F. (2014). The implementation of the CLS constructor in ARTEMIS. In Nolan, B. and Peri-án-Pascual, C. (eds.) Language Processing and Grammars the role of functionally oriented computational models. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 164-196. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Peri-án-Pascual, C. and Mairal Usón, R. (2010). "La gramática de COREL: un lenguaje de representación conceptual The COREL grammar: a conceptual representation language". ONOMÁZEIN, 21/1: 11-45. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2013). Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics, 231-270. doi:10.1075/slcs.145.09ib225 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Usón, R. M. (2008). Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica, 42(3-4). doi:10.1515/flin.2008.355 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sag, I, Wasow, T. and Bender, E. (2003). Syntactic Theory: Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Steels, L. (2015). "Introducing Fluid Construction Grammar". In L. Steels (ed.) Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3-30. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Van Valin, R. D. J. (2005). Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610578 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139166799 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wintner, S. (2009). What Science Underlies Natural Language Engineering? Computational Linguistics, 35(4), 641-644. doi:10.1162/coli.2009.35.4.35409 | es_ES |