Resumen:
|
[EN] Historically the imaginary and the hegemonic thinking, in the Western globe north, has
been marked by the epistemology and capitalists archetypes. Notwithstanding the design
seem as a practice and discipline shielded ...[+]
[EN] Historically the imaginary and the hegemonic thinking, in the Western globe north, has
been marked by the epistemology and capitalists archetypes. Notwithstanding the design
seem as a practice and discipline shielded on a simplistic discourse of functional /
communicative efficiency, wandering through by multiple aestheticism apparently neutral
in relation to the symbolic, but in fact they never are, because what really hapens is that the
aesthetic appearance of the generated forms will always be a review of the powers ruling.
We start from the understanding that the act of creating an aesthetic artifact, will also be a
movement of inscription in a discursive platform (that precedes it), is in itself an narrative
act and that fact represent a certain take place in relation to certain symbolic reality. On
reflection shown if it sees design as a discipline and / or an instrument of action, whose
operational relevance tends to question and simultaneously rehearsing a response, in
which more than why interests answer to why.
Apparently the design is a content mediator, but also, it is structure, is body, is idea. We
think a design praxis as discipline and enrollment tool of critical thought and social
transformation. For guiding research in this text, we propose the following question: Can
the Design want for themselves an engagement with the symbolic in order to be an active
part in the production of critical thinking in the place where it belongs? Methodologically
our argument will be present in two differents moments: 1. a first, exploratory nature where
we rescue the draw issues in the practice of design and 2. a second analytical nature
concerning the subject issues (graphic and / or utility ) design and how it incorporates
formal rites, political events and social practices of contemporary everyday life.
We consider the praxis of design as a discipline and critical thinking enrollment tool as
agents of social transformation. With this study we seek for contribute phenomenology
design by studying the artifacts of configuration as well as the possible messages they
convey and what impact they may have on the social network.
[-]
|