- -

Action Research Projects: one step ahead in the researcher-practitioner relationships

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Action Research Projects: one step ahead in the researcher-practitioner relationships

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 7660-27727-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 780.5Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Mejia-Villa, Andres es_ES
dc.contributor.author Alfaro-Tanco, José Antonio es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-03T11:24:38Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-03T11:24:38Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06-07
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/93868
dc.description.abstract [EN] This study pretends to highlight the usefulness of developing action research (AR) projects as a way to develop a set of integrated studies based on a dual contribution: academic and managerial ones. The concept of AR Project goes one step ahead in terms of AR methodology as an extended case study. We describe an specific AR Project associated to a doctoral theses in the field of innovation intermediation. As main results, we have learned from this experience that (1) the relationship between researchers and practitioners must be collaborative and based on trust and commitment, (2) an AR Project is broader and more complex than a case study, (3) the diffusion of research results must be differentiated for practitioners and academics, and finally, (4) the AR Project is an open and collaborative innovation practice. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors thank the financial support offered by University of La Sabana for the doctoral studies of one of the authors.
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Working Papers on Operations Management
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Research methods es_ES
dc.subject Action research projects es_ES
dc.subject Researchers-practitioners relationships es_ES
dc.title Action Research Projects: one step ahead in the researcher-practitioner relationships es_ES
dc.title.alternative Proyectos de Action Research: un paso hacia adelante en la colaboración investigador-“practitioner” es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2017-06-16T07:07:17Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7660
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Mejia-Villa, A.; Alfaro-Tanco, JA. (2017). Action Research Projects: one step ahead in the researcher-practitioner relationships. Working Papers on Operations Management. 8(SP):191-203. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7660 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7660 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 191 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 203 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 8
dc.description.issue SP
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9068
dc.contributor.funder Universidad de La Sabana
dc.description.references Alfaro Tanco, J. A., & Avella Camarero, L. (2013). Investigación en acción: cómo impulsar la contribución de la universidad en la competitividad de las organizaciones. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 2(2). doi:10.3926/hdbr.33 es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro, J.A.; Mejia-Villa, A.; Recalde, M.; & Rodríguez-Ferradas, M. I. (2017). Las asociaciones empresariales como motores de la innovación estratégica en las empresas: marco teórico y aplicación al caso de Navarra. EUNSA. Pamplona, Espa-a. es_ES
dc.description.references Arieli, D., Friedman, V. J., & Agbaria, K. (2009). The paradox of participation in action research. Action Research, 7(3), 263-290. doi:10.1177/1476750309336718 es_ES
dc.description.references Avella, L., & Alfaro, J. A. (2014). Spanish University Business Chairs used to increase the deployment of Action Research in Operations Management: A case study and analysis. Action Research, 12(2), 194-208. doi:10.1177/1476750314528010 es_ES
dc.description.references Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399-1417. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0618 es_ES
dc.description.references Baskerville, R. L. (1997). Distinguishing action research from participative case studies. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 1(1), 24-43. doi:10.1108/13287269780000733 es_ES
dc.description.references Buganza, T., & Verganti, R. (2009). Open innovation process to inbound knowledge. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 306-325. doi:10.1108/14601060910974200 es_ES
dc.description.references Chein, I., Cook, S. W., & Harding, J. (1948). The field of action research. American Psychologist, 3(2), 43-50. doi:10.1037/h0053515 es_ES
dc.description.references Coghlan, D. (2006). Insider action research doctorates: Generating actionable knowledge. Higher Education, 54(2), 293-306. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-5450-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Coghlan, D. (2010). Seeking Common Ground in the Diversity and Diffusion of Action Research and Collaborative Management Research Action Modalities: Toward a General Empirical Method. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 149-181. doi:10.1108/s0897-3016(2010)0000018009 es_ES
dc.description.references Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 220-240. doi:10.1108/01443570210417515 es_ES
dc.description.references Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2016). Action research. In: Christer Karlsson. Research methods for operations management (pp.233-267). New York: Routledge es_ES
dc.description.references Curle, A. (1949). A Theoretical Approach to Action Research. Human Relations, 2(3), 269-280. doi:10.1177/001872674900200304 es_ES
dc.description.references Friesike, S., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O., & Schildhauer, T. (2014). Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 581-601. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Johansson, A. W., & Lindhult, E. (2008). Emancipation or workability? Action Research, 6(1), 95-115. doi:10.1177/1476750307083713 es_ES
dc.description.references Klocker, N. (2012). Doing Participatory Action Research and Doing a PhD: Words of Encouragement for Prospective Students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(1), 149-163. doi:10.1080/03098265.2011.589828 es_ES
dc.description.references Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x es_ES
dc.description.references McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2010). You and your action research project. London: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Shani, A. B. (Rami), & Canterino, F. (2016). The action research cycle reloaded: Conducting action research across buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(4), 289-298. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2016.06.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Meredith, J. R., Raturi, A., Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Kaplan, B. (1989). Alternative research paradigms in operations. Journal of Operations Management, 8(4), 297-326. doi:10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Miles, R.E., Miles, G., & Snow, C.C. (2005). Collaborative Entrepreneurship: How Communities of Networked Firms Use Continuous Innovation to Create Economic Wealth. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. es_ES
dc.description.references Näslund, D., Kale, R., & Paulraj, A. (2010). ACTION RESEARCH IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-A FRAMEWORK FOR RELEVANT AND RIGOROUS RESEARCH. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(2), 331-355. doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00155.x es_ES
dc.description.references Nogeste, K. (2008). Dual cycle action research: a professional doctorate case study. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(4), 566-585. doi:10.1108/17538370810906264 es_ES
dc.description.references Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016-1034. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Ottosson, S. (2003). Participation action research-. Technovation, 23(2), 87-94. doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00097-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x es_ES
dc.description.references Sexton, M., & Lu, S. (2009). The challenges of creating actionable knowledge: an action research perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 27(7), 683-694. doi:10.1080/01446190903037702 es_ES
dc.description.references Shani, A.B., & Pasmore, W. (1985). Organisation inquiry: Toward a new model of the action research process. In: Warrick, D.D (ed.) Contemporary Organisation Development: Current Thinking and Applications. Glenview, II: Scott Foresman. es_ES
dc.description.references Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582. doi:10.2307/2392581 es_ES
dc.description.references Towers, N., & Chen, R. (2008). Employing the participative paradigm as a valid empirical approach to gaining a greater understanding of contemporary supply chain and distribution management issues. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(8), 627-637. doi:10.1108/09590550810883478 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 07(03), 247-279. doi:10.1142/s1363919603000817 es_ES
dc.description.references Von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133-153. doi:10.2307/41165947 es_ES
dc.description.references Westbrook, R. (1995). Action research: a new paradigm for research in production and operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(12), 6-20. doi:10.1108/01443579510104466 es_ES
dc.description.references Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2001). Action Learning and Action Research: Paradigm, Praxis and Programs. In: Sankara, S., Dick, B. and Passfield, R. (eds) Effective Change Management through Action Research and Action Learning: Concepts, Perspectives, Processes and Applications. Southern Cross University Press, Lismore, Australia, pp. 1-20. es_ES
dc.description.references Zuber‐Skerritt, O., & Fletcher, M. (2007). The quality of an action research thesis in the social sciences. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(4), 413-436. doi:10.1108/09684880710829983 es_ES
dc.description.references Zuber‐Skerritt, O., & Perry, C. (2002). Action research within organisations and university thesis writing. The Learning Organization, 9(4), 171-179. doi:10.1108/09696470210428895 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem