Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Schiltz, Guillaume | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-15T07:04:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-15T07:04:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-06-26 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9788490485903 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/104151 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] In this paper we present the preliminary results of a study covering 217 written comments submitted in the formal university SET questionnaire of two undergraduate physics lectures for engineering students. Concerning the SET-metrics, one of the lectures was rated as critical, while the other lecture had good results. The analysis is based on the praise and criticism framework elaborated by Hyland/Hyland (2001) for written feedback. Our findings, which also relate written feedback to quantitative variables and contrast the results between critical and good evaluations, provide a deeper insight for both, teachers and educational developers, on how to interpret written comments in a quality management process. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 7 | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Higher Education | es_ES |
dc.subject | Learning | es_ES |
dc.subject | Educational systems | es_ES |
dc.subject | Teaching | es_ES |
dc.subject | Student evaluations of teaching | es_ES |
dc.subject | Students' comments | es_ES |
dc.subject | Content analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Quality management | es_ES |
dc.subject | Student voice | es_ES |
dc.subject | Formative feedback | es_ES |
dc.title | Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET): Clues on how to interpret written feedback | es_ES |
dc.type | Capítulo de libro | es_ES |
dc.type | Comunicación en congreso | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/HEAD17.2017.5390 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Schiltz, G. (2017). Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET): Clues on how to interpret written feedback. En Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. 743-749. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAD17.2017.5390 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | OCS | es_ES |
dc.relation.conferencename | Third International Conference on Higher Education Advances | es_ES |
dc.relation.conferencedate | June 21-23,2017 | es_ES |
dc.relation.conferenceplace | Valencia, Spain | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/HEAD/HEAD17/paper/view/5390 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 743 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 749 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | OCS\5390 | es_ES |