- -

Protocol: Literature review on the psychometric properties of the short versions of the scales of social desirability in the answers to competency self-assessment questionnaires

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Protocol: Literature review on the psychometric properties of the short versions of the scales of social desirability in the answers to competency self-assessment questionnaires

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 9172-35186-4-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 400.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Marin-Garcia, Juan A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Betancour, Estefania es_ES
dc.contributor.author Giraldo-O'Meara, Martha es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-13T07:13:50Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-13T07:13:50Z
dc.date.issued 2018-06-29
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/107197
dc.description.abstract [EN] Research in business organization in general and talent management (in university or professional students) uses in many cases self-administered questionnaires as a source of data to assess people's competencies. In clinical psychology, it has been shown that self-evaluations of behaviors may present a bias of social desirability. However, even in this field of research it is not usual to measure its effect when taking data. Our work proposes a protocol to find a set of scales of social desirability (SD) with less than 20 items that are valid and reliable. We also intend to identify if SD scales are associated with the self-assessments of some transversal competences. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] La investigación en organización de empresas en general y la gestión del talento (en alumnos universitarios o profesionales) usa en muchos casos los cuestionarios auto-administrados como fuente de datos para evaluar las competencias de las personas. En el área de la psicología clínica se ha demostrado que las auto-evaluaciones de conductas o comportamientos pueden presentar un sesgo de deseabilidad social. Sin embargo, ni siquiera en ése campo de investigación es habitual que se mida su efecto al tomar datos. Nuestro trabajo plantea un protocolo para encontrar un conjunto de escalas de deseabilidad social (SD) con menos de 20 ítems que sean válidas y fiables. Además, pretendemos identificar si las escalas de SD están asociadas a las auto-valoraciones de algunas competencias transversales. es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Working Papers on Operations Management
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Literature review es_ES
dc.subject Protocol es_ES
dc.subject Social desirability es_ES
dc.subject Short version es_ES
dc.subject Scales es_ES
dc.subject Soft skills es_ES
dc.subject Revisión de literatura es_ES
dc.subject Protocolo es_ES
dc.subject Deseabilidad social es_ES
dc.subject Escalas es_ES
dc.subject Cuestionarios es_ES
dc.subject Versiones cortas es_ES
dc.subject Competencias transversales es_ES
dc.title Protocol: Literature review on the psychometric properties of the short versions of the scales of social desirability in the answers to competency self-assessment questionnaires es_ES
dc.title.alternative Protocolo: revisión de literatura sobre las propiedades psicométricas de las versiones cortas de las escalas de deseabilidad social en las respuestas a cuestionarios de autoevaluación de competencias es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2018-09-12T12:55:14Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wpom.v9i1.9172
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Marin-Garcia, JA.; Betancour, E.; Giraldo-O'meara, M. (2018). Protocol: Literature review on the psychometric properties of the short versions of the scales of social desirability in the answers to competency self-assessment questionnaires. Working Papers on Operations Management. 9(1):14-29. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.9172 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i1.9172 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 14 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 29 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 9
dc.description.issue 1
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9068
dc.description.references Andrews, P., & Meyer, R. G. (2003). Marlowe-Crowne social Desirability Scale and short Form C: Forensic norms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(4), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10136 es_ES
dc.description.references Anthony, S., & Garner, B. (2016). Teaching soft skills to business students: An analysis of multiple pedagogical methods. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79(3), 360-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616642247 es_ES
dc.description.references Ayhan, M. B., & Oztemel, E. (2014). A methodology to measure the degree of managerial innovation. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(1), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.927 es_ES
dc.description.references Beretvas, S. N., Meyers, J. L., & Leite, W. L. (2002). A Reliability Generalization Study of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316402128775021 es_ES
dc.description.references Bobbio, A., & Manganelli, A. M. (2011). Measuring social desirability responding. A short version of Paulhus' BIDR 6. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18(2), 117-135. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84878800292&partnerID=40&md5=d49417c23ce033f6cacb880d67c404f6 es_ES
dc.description.references Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods. USA: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Butter, R., & van Beest, W. (2017). Psychometric validation of a tool for innovation competencies development and assessment using a mixed-method design. Paper presented at the EURAM (21-24 June), Glasgow. es_ES
dc.description.references Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE. es_ES
dc.description.references Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349-354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358 es_ES
dc.description.references De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412441284 es_ES
dc.description.references Diez, E. V., Zárraga-Rodríguez, M., & García, C. J. (2013). A tool to assess teamwork performance in higher education. Intangible Capital, 9(1), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.399 es_ES
dc.description.references DiLillo, D., Hayes-Skelton, S. A., Fortier, M. A., Perry, A. R., Evans, S. E., Moore, T. L. M., ... Fauchier, A. (2010). Development and initial psychometric properties of the Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventory (CAMI): A comprehensive self-report measure of child maltreatment history. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(5), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.015 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). Acquiescence and social desirability as item response determinants: An irt-based study with the marlowe-crowne and the epq lie scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 596-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrando, P., & Chico Librán, E. (2000). Adaptación y análisis psicométrico de la escala de deseabilidad social de marlowe y crowne. Psicothema, 12(3), 383-389. es_ES
dc.description.references Fisher, R. J., & Katz, J. E. (2000). Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<105::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the revised eysenck personality questionnaire (epqr-a): Its use among students in england, canada, the u.S.A. And australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90073-X es_ES
dc.description.references Friese, S. (2012). Qualitative data analysis with atlas.Ti. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. es_ES
dc.description.references García-Ros, R. (2011). Analysis and validation of a rubric to assess oral presentation skills in university contexts. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1043--1062. es_ES
dc.description.references Gopinath, C. (1999). Alternatives to instructor assessment of class participation. Journal of Education for Business, 75(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329909598983 es_ES
dc.description.references Greenberg, B., & Weiss, P. (2012). Validation of a Short Form of the Marlowe-Crowne for Use with Law Enforcement Personnel. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(2), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-012-9100-z es_ES
dc.description.references Gutiérrez, S., Sanz, J., Espinosa, R., Gesteira, C., & García-Vera, M. P. (2016). La Escala de Deseabilidad Social de Marlowe-Crowne: baremos para la población general española y desarrollo de una versión breve. Anales de Psicología, 32(1), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.185471 es_ES
dc.description.references Halfhill, T. R., & Nielsen, T. M. (2007). Quantifying the "softer side" of management education: An example using teamwork competencies. Journal of Management Education, 31(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906287777 es_ES
dc.description.references Holden, R. R., Lambert, C. E., D'Agata, M. T., & Book, A. S. (2017). Response patterns for the identification of fakers: Detecting drifting dissimulators. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.029 es_ES
dc.description.references Isenhart, C. E. (1994). MOTIVATIONAL SUBTYPES IN AN INPATIENT SAMPLE OF SUBSTANCE-ABUSERS. Addictive Behaviors, 19(5), 463-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(94)90002-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Karakurt, G., Erguner-Tekinalp, B., Terzi, S., Ergüner-Tekinalp, B., & Terzi, Ş. (2009). The Psychometric Qualities of the Turkish Version of Emotional Abuse Questionnaire. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 9(36), 7-22. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84987730675&partnerID=40&md5=8d0171b5a4df70040f2c2bc7aa8422c2 es_ES
dc.description.references Katou, A. A. (2008). Measuring the impact of hrm on organizational performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 1(2), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2008.v1n2.p119-142 es_ES
dc.description.references King, M. F., Bruner, G. C., Reversals, P., Kind, D., Less, M. I., Author, P., ... Tadesse, G. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<79::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, California. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947 es_ES
dc.description.references Leach, L. (2010). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, Z., & Woodliffe, L. (2010). Donor Misreporting: Conceptualizing Social Desirability Bias in Giving Surveys. Voluntas, 21(4), 569-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9153-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2015). Publishing in two phases for focused research by means of "research collaborations". WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 6(2), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4459 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Martinez Tomas, J. (2016). Deconstructing amo framework: A systematic review. Intangible Capital, 12(4), 1040-1087. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.838 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Santandreu-Mascarell, C. (2015). What do we know about rubrics used in higher education? Intangible Capital, 11(1), 118-145. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.538 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Andreu Andres, M. A., Atares-Huerta, L., Aznar-Mas, L. E., Garcia-Carbonell, A., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., . . . Watts, F. (2016). Propossal of framework for innovation competencies development and assessment (fincoda). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6472 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Aragonés Beltran, P., & Melón, G. (2014). Intra-rater and inter-rater consistency of pair wise comparison in evaluating the innovation competency for university students. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 5(2), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v5i2.3220 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Atares-Huerta, L., & Aznar-Mas, L. E. (2017). ¿cuántas competencias transversales podemos diferenciar en un auto-diagnóstico? Paper presented at the IN-RED Congreso Nacional de Innovación Educativa y de Docencia en Red, UPV. Valencia, 13 y 14 de junio 2017. es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Perello-Marin, M. R., & Canos-Daros, L. (2009). Proposal of skills for the bachelor degree of industrial engineering in the context of the new curriculum. Intangible Capital, 5(4), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2009.v5n4.p387-406 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Ramirez Bayarri, L., & Atares-Huerta, L. (2015). Protocol: Comparing advantages and disadvantages of rating scales, behavior observation scales and paired comparison scales for behavior assessment of competencies in workers. A systematic literature review. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 2(6), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v6i2.4032 es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez Gómez, M., Marin-Garcia, J., & Giraldo-O'Meara, M. (2016). The measurement invariance of job diagnostic survey (jds) across three university student groups. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1783 es_ES
dc.description.references Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2011). Research in operations management teaching: Trends and challenges. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 507-548. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p507-548 es_ES
dc.description.references Medina-López, C., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2010). Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía (a methodological proposal for the systematic literature review). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 1(2), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786 es_ES
dc.description.references Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The, P. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 es_ES
dc.description.references Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.307 es_ES
dc.description.references Perinelli, E., & Gremigni, P. (2016). Use of Social Desirability Scales in Clinical Psychology: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 534-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22284 es_ES
dc.description.references Pujol-Jover, M., Riera-Prunera, C., & Abio, G. (2015). Competences acquisition of university students: Do they match job market's needs? Intangible Capital, 11(4), 612-626. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.625 es_ES
dc.description.references Ramirez Bayarri, L., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Atares-Huerta, L. (2016). How has been assessed the innovation competency in companies and universities? WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 140-167. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6886 es_ES
dc.description.references Sandin, B., Valiente, R. M., Chorot, P., & Olmedo, M. (2002). Versión española del cuestionario epqr-abreviado (epqr-a) (i): Análisis exploratorio de la estructura factorial. Revista de Psicopato/ogfa y Psicología Clínica, 7(3), 195-205. es_ES
dc.description.references Santandreu-Mascarell, C., Canós-Darós, L., & Pons-Morera, C. (2011). Competencies and skills for future industrial engineers defined in spanish degrees. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n1.p13-30 es_ES
dc.description.references Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students, 7/e. Essex: Pearson Education. es_ES
dc.description.references Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment - relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382153 es_ES
dc.description.references Stöber, J., & Stober, J. (1999). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Development and first results on reliability and validity. Diagnostica, 45(4), 173-177. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0000840720&partnerID=40&md5=0eda7e6d1aa6b7c3a2ec81a70b0d3603 https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173 es_ES
dc.description.references Thompson, E. R., & Phua, F. T. T. (2005). Reliability among senior managers of the Marlowe-Crowne short-form social desirability scale. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-4524-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Tracey, T. J. G. (2016). A Note on Socially Desirable Responding. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000135 es_ES
dc.description.references van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40-48. es_ES
dc.description.references Voller, E. K., Long, P. J., & Aosved, A. C. (2009). Attraction to sexual violence towards women, sexual abuse of children, and non-sexual criminal behavior: Testing the specialist vs. generalist models in male college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(2), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9343-z es_ES
dc.description.references Watts, F., Marin-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Carbonell, A., & Aznar-Mas, L. E. (2012). Validation of a rubric to assess innovation competence. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 3(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v3i1.1159 es_ES
dc.description.references Williams, B., & Figueiredo, J. (2014). Lessons from an innovation-leader and tools to learn them. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(4), 932-960. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1135 es_ES
dc.description.references Zemore, S. E. (2012). The effect of social desirability on reported motivation, substance use severity, and treatment attendance. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 42(4), 400-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Zemore, S. E., & Ajzen, I. (2014). Predicting substance abuse treatment completion using a new scale based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(2), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.06.011 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem