- -

The Challenges of Blended Learning: Critically Evaluating the Chinese Language Case

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The Challenges of Blended Learning: Critically Evaluating the Chinese Language Case

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Hu, Bo es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-26T07:40:15Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-26T07:40:15Z
dc.date.issued 2012-09-29
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/117341
dc.description.abstract [EN] This article reviews the Mid-Career Development Chinese Language course (MCDCL) funded by the British Inter-university China Centre, a project funded from various public sources in the UK. The discussion focuses on how and why the MCDCL course has adopted the blended learning construct and with what outcomes. Using two frameworks for blended learning – the Community of Inquiry and the Sloan-C Pillars – it offers a thorough examination of the MCDCL course, and discusses the results of a survey which was devised to collect feedback from participants on the course. The article concludes that the MCDCL course throws up particular challenges for the blended learning concept as a whole. A detailed evaluation highlights areas for attention ranging from how the course is organised and workloads are balanced, to the approach of teachers in their level of involvement in distance learning, and the overall management of the course with regard to the use of technology, cost-effectiveness and a host of other considerations. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof The EuroCALL Review
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Blended learning es_ES
dc.subject Course evaluation es_ES
dc.subject Chinese language course es_ES
dc.subject British Inter-university China Centre es_ES
dc.subject Mid-Career Development Chinese Language Course es_ES
dc.title The Challenges of Blended Learning: Critically Evaluating the Chinese Language Case es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2019-02-25T09:02:43Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/eurocall.2012.11380
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Hu, B. (2012). The Challenges of Blended Learning: Critically Evaluating the Chinese Language Case. The EuroCALL Review. 20(2):80-94. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2012.11380 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2012.11380 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 80 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 94 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 20
dc.description.issue 2
dc.identifier.eissn 1695-2618
dc.description.references Arabasz, P. and Baker, B., M. (2003). Supporting e-learning in higher education. Educause Centre for Applied Research. Avalialable from http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/SupportingELearninginHigherEdu/156516 (Last accessed on March 21, 2011). es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R. and Archer, W (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Available from http://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/725 (Last accessed on December 15, 2011) es_ES
dc.description.references Benbunan-Fich, R. and Hiltz, R. S. (1999). Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, pp. 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008669710763 es_ES
dc.description.references Benson, P. (2001). Autonomy in Language Learning. Pearson Education Limited. Blended Learning Unit. Available from http://www.herts.ac.uk/about-us/learning-and- teaching/learning-teaching-institute/blu-cetl/home.cfm (Last accessed on March 21, 2011). es_ES
dc.description.references Broady, E. and Kenning, M. (1996) Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching. London: CiLT. es_ES
dc.description.references British Inter-university China Centre. http://www.bicc.ac.uk/ (Last accessed on March 21, 2011) es_ES
dc.description.references Garrison, R. D. and Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning In the 21st Century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093 es_ES
dc.description.references Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3): 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071 es_ES
dc.description.references Garrison, R. D. and Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10(3): 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Garrison, R., D. and Vaughan, D., N (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. es_ES
dc.description.references Graham (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In Bonk, C. and Graham, C. (Eds), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, pp. 3-21. es_ES
dc.description.references Graham, C. R., Allen, S., and Ure, D. (2005) Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, pp. 253-259. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-553-5.ch047 es_ES
dc.description.references Hanson, K. & Clem, F. (2006). To blend or not to blend: A look at community development via blended learning strategies. In Bonk, C. and Graham, C. (Eds), The Handbook of Blended learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, pp. 136-154. es_ES
dc.description.references Hong, H. K. and Samimy, K. K. (2010). The influence of L2 teachers' use of CALL modes on language learners' reactions to blended learning. CALICO Journal, 27(2): 328-348. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.328-348 es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, B. (2010). The challenges of Chinese: a preliminary study of UK learners' perceptions of difficulty. Language Learning Journal, 38(1): 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571731003620721 es_ES
dc.description.references Kvavik, B. R. and Caruso, B. J. (2005). ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology, 2005: Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning. Educause Centre for Applied Research. Available from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0506/rs/ERS0506w.pdf (Last accessed on March 21, 2011). es_ES
dc.description.references Laumakis, M., Graham, C. and Dziuban, C. (2009). The Sloan-C pillars and boundary objects as a framework for evaluating blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1): 75-87. es_ES
dc.description.references Lorenzo, G. and Moore, G. L. (2002). The Sloan Consortium Report to the Nation: Five Pillars of Quality Online Education. The Sloan Consortium. Available from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/books/pillarreport1.pdf (Last accessed on March 21, 2011). es_ES
dc.description.references McPherson, M. and Nunes, M., B. (2004). The failure of a virtual social space (VSS) designed to create a learning community: Lesson learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3): 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00391.x es_ES
dc.description.references Moore, C.J. (2005) The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework and The Five Pillars. The Sloan Consortium. Available from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/books/qualityframework.pdf (Last accessed on March 21, 2011). es_ES
dc.description.references Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning. Parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344005000224 es_ES
dc.description.references Newman, D. R., Webb. B. and Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported cooperative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6): 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q es_ES
dc.description.references Osguthorpe, T. and Graham, C. (2003). Blended learning environments: definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3): 227-233. es_ES
dc.description.references Sharman, P. and Barrett, B. (2007). Blended Learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Oxford: Macmillan. es_ES
dc.description.references Shea, P., Hayes, S., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., Valchova, A. and Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Salaway, G., Caruso, B. J. and Nelson, R. M. (2008). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate students and Technology Information. Educause Centre Applied Research. Available from http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/TheECARStudyofUndergraduateStu/163283 (Last accessed on March 21, 2011). es_ES
dc.description.references So, H. and Brush, T. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1): 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Williams, E., Duray, R. and Reddy, V. (2006). Teamwork orientation, group cohesiveness, and student learning: A study of the use of teams in online distance education. Journal of Management Education, 30(4) 592-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905276740 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhao, Y. and Lai, C. (2008). Massively Multi-Player Online Role Playing Games (MMORPGS) and Foreign Language Education. In Ferdig, R. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. New York: IDEA Group. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem