- -

Learning autonomy, digital learners and Google Education: a rhizomatic English syllabus framework

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Learning autonomy, digital learners and Google Education: a rhizomatic English syllabus framework

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Kara - Learning ...
Tamaño: 1.124Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Kara, Samia es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-03T12:46:36Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-03T12:46:36Z
dc.date.issued 2019-03-30
dc.identifier.issn 1695-2618
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/138257
dc.description.abstract [EN] Exploiting the free technology empowering services with which Google supplies the educational field, the present paper contributes a Google Education mediated syllabus framework to the field of teaching English as a second/ foreign language. Through a systems approach methodology, the framework addressed the concepts of ‘learner autonomy’ and ‘digital learners’ within the scope of its consecutive blocks: conceptualisation, planning and development. The relevance of this effort is to be seen in terms of bridging the ever-growing gap between the classroom and the digital world of web 2.0 learners; as well as enabling the teachers to contextualise the proposed tool with regard to their syllabi development, renewal and adaptation.  es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof The EuroCALL Review es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject English as second/foreign language es_ES
dc.subject Learner autonomy es_ES
dc.subject Digital learners es_ES
dc.subject Syllabus framework es_ES
dc.subject Google Education es_ES
dc.title Learning autonomy, digital learners and Google Education: a rhizomatic English syllabus framework es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/eurocall.2019.10709
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Kara, S. (2019). Learning autonomy, digital learners and Google Education: a rhizomatic English syllabus framework. The EuroCALL Review. 27(1):30-47. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2019.10709 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2019.10709 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 30 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 47 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 27 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\10709 es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. London: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Bennett, S. Maton, K. & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x es_ES
dc.description.references Blake, R. J. (2008). Brave New Digital Classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning. Georgetown University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay. es_ES
dc.description.references Bouchard, P. (2012). Self-directed learning and learner autonomy. Seel, N. M. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Sciences of Learning. Springer, 2997-3000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1781 es_ES
dc.description.references Boulton, A. Chateau, A. Pereiro, M. & Azzam-Hannachi, R. (2008). Learning to learn languages with ICT - but how? CALL-EJ Online, 9(2). Retrieved 19 June 2018 from http://callej.org/journal/9-2/boulton.html. es_ES
dc.description.references Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Candy, P. (1991). Self-Direction in Learning: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. es_ES
dc.description.references Cembalo, M. & Holec, H. (1973). Les langues aux adultes: Pour une pedagogie de l'autonomie. Melanges Pedagogiques. CRAPEL. Retrieved 19 June 2018 from http://www.atilf.fr/IMG/pdf/5cembalo-holec.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Churches, A. (2008). Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. Retrieved 13 August 2018 from http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/f/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate 4(5). Retrieved 10 July 2018 from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/06/03/rhizomaticeducation-community-as-curriculum/. es_ES
dc.description.references Corneli, J. & Danoff, C. J. (2011). Paragogy. In Proceedings of the 6th Open Knowledge Conference, OKCon 2011, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved August 20 2018 from http://ceurws.org/Vol-739/paper_5.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Crook, C. & Harrison, C. (2008). Web 2.0 Technologies for Learning at Key Stages 3 and 4. Coventry: Becta Publications. es_ES
dc.description.references Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771 es_ES
dc.description.references Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The GR8 DB8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Daley, J. P. (2011). Deconstructing formal and informal learning spaces with social networking sites. Thomas, M. (Ed.). Digital Education. London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118003_11 es_ES
dc.description.references Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106. es_ES
dc.description.references Fau, S. & Moreau, Y. (2018). Managing Tomorrow's Digital Skills - What Conclusions can we Draw from International Comparative Indicators? Paris: UNESCO. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrara, K. Brunner, H. & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8-34. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088391008001002 es_ES
dc.description.references Gallardo-Echnique, E. E., Marques-Molias, L., Bullen, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2015). Let's Talk about Digital Learners in the Digital Era. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3). Retrieved 6 May 2014 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/issue/view/69. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2196 es_ES
dc.description.references Google (2018). Solutions built for teachers and students. Google for Education. Retrieved 14 August 2018 from https://edu.google.com/?modal_active=none. es_ES
dc.description.references Google drive https://drive.google.com. es_ES
dc.description.references Gremmo, M.-J., & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00002-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Hase, S. and Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8766 es_ES
dc.description.references Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Howe, N. Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books. es_ES
dc.description.references International Bureau of Education. (2017). Training Tools for Curriculum Development: Developing and Implementing Curriculum Frameworks. Paris: UNESCO. es_ES
dc.description.references Jiménez Raya, M. & Lamb, T.E. (2008). Manifestations of Autonomy in the School Curriculum. In M. Jiménez Raya & T.E. Lamb (Eds.), Pedagogy for Autonomy in Modern Languages Education: Theory, Practice, and Teacher Education (pp. 58-76). Dublin: Authentik. es_ES
dc.description.references Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarnot, B. and Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond digital natives and immigrants: Exploring types of net generation students, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x es_ES
dc.description.references Lamb, T.E. (2017). 'Knowledge about language and learner autonomy', in Cenoz, J. & Gorter, D. (Eds.) Language Awareness and Multilingualism. In: Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing Switzerland: 173186. Retrieved 8 July 2018 from http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/20414/1/Lamb%20KALLA%20complete%20fina l%20rev.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik. es_ES
dc.description.references Morrison, B. (2011). Building on experience, seeking new perspectives. In Morrison, B. (Ed.), Independent Language Learning: Building on Experience, Seeking New Perspectives. Hong Kong University Press, pp. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888083640.003.0001 es_ES
dc.description.references OECD (2016). Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/9789264265097-en. Retrieved 10 July 2018 from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/GEIS2016Background-document.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en es_ES
dc.description.references Oxford, R. L. (2008). Chapter 3: Hero with a Thousand Faces: Learner Autonomy, Learning Strategies and Learning Tactics in Independent Language Learning. In Stella Hurd & Tim Lewis (Eds.), Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 41- 64). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690999-005 es_ES
dc.description.references Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In Benson, P. & Voller, P. (Eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. MCB University Press. Retrieved 10 July 2018 from https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Reeves, T. C. & Oh, E. (2008). Generational Differences. Spector, J.M. Merrill, M.D. Merrienboer, J. V. & Driscoll, M. P. (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 295-303). Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Retrieved 10 July 2018 from https://www.learningnetwork.ac.nz/shared/professionalReading/TRCONN2011.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus. es_ES
dc.description.references Rushkoff, D. (2006). Screenagers: Lessons in Chaos from Digital Kids. New York: Hampton Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Rowlands, I. Nicholas, D. Williams, P. Huntington, P. Fieldhouse, M. Gunter, B. Withey, R. Jamali, H. R. T. Dobrowolski, T. & Tenopir, C. (2008). The Google Generation: the Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future, Aslib Proceedings, 60(4), 290310. Retrieved 10 July 2018 from https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810887953. es_ES
dc.description.references Steyaert, J. and J. de Haan (2001). Geleidelijk Digitaal: Een Nuchtere Kijk op de Gevolgen van ICT [Gradually Digital: A Sober Look at the Consequences of ICT]. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands. es_ES
dc.description.references Stowe, R. A. (1973). Research and systems approach as methodologies for education. AV Communication Review, 21(2), 165-175. Springer. Retrieved 13 September 2016 from https://jstor.org/stable/30218523. es_ES
dc.description.references Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing your World. New York: McGraw-Hill. es_ES
dc.description.references Torocsik, M. Szucs, K. & Kehl, D. (2014). How Generations Think: Research on Generation Z. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio, 1, 13-45. es_ES
dc.description.references Underwood, J. D. & Farrington-Flint, L. (2015). Learning and the E-Generation. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. es_ES
dc.description.references Vaidhyanathan, S. (2008). Generational myth: Not all young people are tech-savvy, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(4). Retrieved 10 July 2018 from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Generational-Myth/32491. es_ES
dc.description.references Veszelszki, Á. (2017). Digilect: the Impact of Infocommunication Technology on Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110499117 es_ES
dc.description.references Wenger, E. McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business Review Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Wheeler, S. & Gerver, R. (2015). Learning with 'e's: Educational Theory and Practice in the Digital Age. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Willems, A. S. & Lewalter, D. (2012). Self-determination and learning. In Seel, N. M. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Sciences of Learning. Springer, 2993-2997. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_250 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem