- -

Comparative and Systematic Study on Staff Development in European and Chinese Universities

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Comparative and Systematic Study on Staff Development in European and Chinese Universities

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Yihong, Fan es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-27T10:28:34Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-27T10:28:34Z
dc.date.issued 2011-05-25
dc.identifier.issn 1887-4592
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/141588
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper summarizes a comparative and systematic study on staff development between Chinese and European universities with North American universities as background studies. The conceptual analytical lens is two‐fold, one is Boyer’s multiple‐scholarship perspective and the other is a four dimensional faculty development framework proposed by America National Education Association. The specific investigation framework of case studies pays attention to the following aspects: conceptual underpinning, context and policy, organizational structure, program and program delivery, incentive and reward scheme for staff development work, evaluation and effect of programs and future staff development trends. The objective of this study is to find out the staff development practices in European universities to shed light on the next phase of staff development policies and programs in China. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] Este artículo es el resumen de un estudio comparativo y sistemático sobre la formación docente, entre universidades chinas y europeas, con el referente de fondo de los estudios sobre las universidades norteamericanas. El enfoque seguido para el análisis conceptual es doble; la perspectiva de Boyer acerca de la multiplicidad de funciones académicas es el primero. El segundo, es un modelo de cuatro dimensiones del desarrollo del profesorado propuesto por la Asociación Nacional Americana de Educación. El enfoque específico de investigación sobre estudios de caso presta atención a los siguientes aspectos: el marco conceptual, el contexto y la política, la estructura organizativa, la propuesta curricular y su desarrollo, el sistema de incentivos y recompensas para el trabajo académico y la evaluación y el efecto de los programas y las futuras tendencias de desarrollo del personal académico. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer las prácticas de desarrollo del personal en las universidades es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This paper is part of the research project on Comparative Study of Staff/Faculty Development between Chinese and European Universities sponsored by MoE Rsearch Base of Social Science and Humanities of Higher Education Development and Research Center in Xiamen University. The Project Number is 07JJD880237. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Multiple‐scholarship es_ES
dc.subject Staff/faculty development es_ES
dc.subject University quality es_ES
dc.subject Innovative education es_ES
dc.subject Multiplicidad de funciones académicas es_ES
dc.subject Desarrollo académico/docente es_ES
dc.subject Calidad universitaria es_ES
dc.subject Educación innovadora es_ES
dc.title Comparative and Systematic Study on Staff Development in European and Chinese Universities es_ES
dc.title.alternative Estudio comparativo y sistemático sobre el desarrollo del personal en universidades europeas y chinas es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/redu.2011.6183
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/XMU//07JJD880237/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Yihong, F. (2011). Comparative and Systematic Study on Staff Development in European and Chinese Universities. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 9(1). https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2011.6183 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2011.6183 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 111 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 9 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1887-4592
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\6183 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Xiamen University es_ES
dc.description.references Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, M. (2009). From Faculty Training to Faculty Development: Policy Study and Statistic Review of Academic Articles. Master's thesis. Link at: http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD‐10384‐2009189722.htm. (In Chinese). es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, S. (2009). Comparative Research on the Systems and Futures of Faculty Development in China and the Great Britain. Master's thesis. Link at: http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD‐10384‐2009179719.htm. (In Chinese) es_ES
dc.description.references Cowen, B. J. (1997). From Policy to Practice: Staff development in higher education‐the key to the effective management change, In Watson, K., et al., Reforms of Higher Education. London: Cassell / Wellington House. es_ES
dc.description.references Engvik, G. & Halland, G. (2006). UNIPED‐A key player in assuring learning quality, In Fan, Y. et al. (Eds.), Assuring University Learning Quality: Cross‐Boundary Collaboration. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Fan, Y. & Fan, M. (2009). Multiple‐Scholarship Fostered Faculty Development: Theory and Practice, Educational Research and Experiment. 2009. (6). es_ES
dc.description.references ICE Presentation. (2010). PPT documentation presented and provided to our team by Araceli Adam, ICE/UPC. es_ES
dc.description.references Kearney, M. (2009). Higher Education, Research and Innovation: Charting the Course of the Changing Dynamics of the Knowledge Society, In Meek, V. L., Teichler., Ulrich, & Kearney, M. (Eds.), Higher Education, Research and Innovation: Changing Dynamics‐Report on the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge 2001‐2009. Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research. es_ES
dc.description.references Lycke, K. H. (1999). Faculty Development: Experiences and issues in a Norwegian Perspective. The International Journal for Academic Development. 1999. es_ES
dc.description.references National Education Association. (1991). Faculty Development in Higher Education: Enhancing a National Resource. A booklet in the series To Promote Academic Justice and Excellence. Washington, DC: NEA Publication. es_ES
dc.description.references NETTLE Case Study Report (2008). Case studies in the Development and Qualification of University Teachers in Europe. Available at: www.nettle.soton.ac.uk:8082. Retrieved in 12 December 2008. es_ES
dc.description.references Postiglione, G.A. (2002). Chinese Higher Education for the Twenty‐First Century: Expansion, consolidation, and globalization, in Higher Education in the Developing World, In Chapman, D.W. & Austin, A. E. (Eds.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Sortland, B. (2006). EiT Interdisciplinary Teamwork: Preparing students for working life, In Fan, Y. et al. (Eds.), Assuring University Learning Quality: Cross-Boundary Collaboration. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press. es_ES
dc.description.references UNESCO (2005). Towards Knowledge Societies, First UNESCO World Report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem