- -

Assessing Spanish Proficiency of Online Language Learners after Year 1

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Assessing Spanish Proficiency of Online Language Learners after Year 1

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Aldrich, RS.; Moneypenny, D. (2019). Assessing Spanish Proficiency of Online Language Learners after Year 1. The EuroCALL Review. 27(2):28-39. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2019.11500

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/143834

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Assessing Spanish Proficiency of Online Language Learners after Year 1
Autor: Aldrich, Rosalie S. Moneypenny, Dianne
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Online (OL) second language (L2) courses are becoming more widely offered in the United States; however, little information exists about the effectiveness of OL L2 courses beyond one semester or course. Therefore, the ...[+]
Palabras clave: Spanish , Online language learning , ACTFL benchmarks , L2 acquisition/learning
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Fuente:
The EuroCALL Review. (issn: 1695-2618 )
DOI: 10.4995/eurocall.2019.11500
Editorial:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2019.11500
Tipo: Artículo

References

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Pages/babson-survey-research-group.aspx

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Language. (2016). Oral Proficiency in the Workplace. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012. https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012

Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2009). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. Journal of Educators Online, 6, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2009.1.4 [+]
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Pages/babson-survey-research-group.aspx

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Language. (2016). Oral Proficiency in the Workplace. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012. https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012

Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2009). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. Journal of Educators Online, 6, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2009.1.4

Angiello, R. (2010). Study looks at online learning vs. traditional instruction. The Education Digest: Essential readings condensed for quick review, 76, 56-59.

Aronoff, N., Stellrecht, E., Lyons, A. G., Zafron, M. L., Glogowski, M., Grabowski, J., & Ohtake, P. J. (2017). Teaching evidence-based practice principles to prepare health professions students for an interpersonal learning experience. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105, 376-384. https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2017.179

Asoodar, M., Marandi, S. S., Atai, M. R., & Vaezi, S. (2014). Learner reflections in virtual vs. blended EAP classes. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.050

Blake, R. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Blake, R. (2015). The messy task of evaluating proficiency in online language courses. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 408-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_5

Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Pardo-Ballester, C. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 114-127.

Cutler, A. (2003). Lexical access. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 2), Epilepsy - Mental imagery, philosophical issues about (pp. 858-864). London: Nature Publishing Group.

Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL, 20, 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000323

Fox, J., & Fraser, W. (2009). Test review: The Versant Spanish Test. Language Testing, 26, 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322090260020602

Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315

González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19, 525-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541745

Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25, 165-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000013

Guillén, G. (2014). Expanding the language classroom: Linguistic gains and learning opportunities through e-tandems and social networks. Dissertation. UC Davis, Davis, CA.

Harker, M., & Koutsantoni, D. (2005). Can it be as effective? Distance versus blended learning in a web-based EAP programme. ReCALL, 17, 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400500042X

Hauck, M., & Stickler, U. (2006). What does it take to teach online? CALICO , 23, 463-475. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.463-475

Heift, T. (2010). Prompting in CALL: A longitudinal study of learner uptake. Modern Language Journal, 94, 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01017.x

Hong, K. H., & Samimy, K. K. (2010). The influence of L2 teachers' use of CALL modes on language learners' reactions to blended learning. CALICO, 27, 328. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.328-348

Inside Higher Ed (2017). Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology. https://www.insidehighered.com/booklet/2017-survey-faculty-attitudes-technology

Isabelli, C. A. (2013). Student learning outcomes in hybrid and face-to-face beginning Spanish language courses. Paper presented at The Future of Education. Florence, Italy. Retrieved from https://conference.pixel-online.net/FOE/conferenceproceedings.php

Isenberg, N.A. (2010). A comparative study of developmental outcomes in web-based and classroom-based German language education at the post-secondary level: Vocabulary, grammar, language processing, and oral proficiency development (Doctoral dissertation). (UMI. 3420155).

Jackson, E. W., & McGlinn, S. (2000). Know the test: One component of test preparation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 31, 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2000.10850104

Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology,18, 20-35.

Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 81-97.

Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lin, C., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Online foreign language education: What are the proficiency outcomes? The Modern Language Journal,99, 394-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_1

Lusin, N. (2012). The MLA survey of postsecondary entrance and degree requirements for languages other than English, 2009-10. New York: Modern Language Association. https://www.mla.org/content/download/3316/81618/requirements_survey_200910.pdf

Mahfouz, S. M. (2010). A study of Jordanian university students' perceptions of using email exchanges with native English keypals for improving their writing competency. CALICO, 27, 393-408. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.393-408

Moneypenny, D., & Aldrich R. S. (2016). Online and face-to-face language learning: A comparative analysis of oral proficiency in introductory Spanish. Journal of Educators Online 13 (2), 105-133. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2016.2.2

Moneypenny, D., & Aldrich, R. S.(2018). Developing oral proficiency in Spanish across class modalities. CALICO: Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, 35, 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.34094

Montiel, M. L. (2018). Comparing online English language learning and face-to-face English language learning at El Bosque University in Colombia. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.

O'Dowd, R. (2007). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690104

Online Learning Consortium. (2015). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/online-report-card-tracking-online-education-united-states-2015/

Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2014). Promoting foreign language collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools. In González-Lloret, M. & Ortega L. (eds.), Technology and tasks: Exploring technology-mediated TBLT. New York: John Benjamins, 115-148. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.6.05osk

Pappas, C. (2013). Top 10 e-learning statistics for 2014 that you need to know. https://elearningindustry.com/top-10-e-learning-statistics-for-2014-you-need-to-know.

Pearson (2011). Versant™ Spanish Test. Test description and validation summary. http://www.versanttest.com/technology/VersantSpanishTestValidation.pdf

Plonsky, L., & Ziegler, N. (2016). The CALL-SLA interface: Insights from a second-order synthesis. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 17-37.

Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, University of North Carolina.

Sato, E., Chen, J. C. C., & Jourdain, S. (2017). Integrating digital technology in an intensive, fully online college course for Japanese beginning learners: A standards-based, performance-driven approach. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 756-775.

Sauro, S. (2011). SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO, 28, 369-391. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.369-391

Tanner, M. W., & Landing, M. L. (2009). The effects of computer-assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners' use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 51-65.

Tarone, E. (2015). Point-counter point measuring proficiency outcomes in online foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 633-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12270_1

Technavio (2016). Online language learning market in the US 2017-2021. https://www.technavio.com/report/

Van Deusen-Scholl, N. (2015). Assessing outcomes in online foreign language education. The Modern Languages Journal, 99, 398-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_2

Volle, L. (2005). Analyzing oral skills in voice e-mail and online interviews. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 146-163.

Zhang, S. (2014). An evidence based guide to designing and developing Chinese-as-a-foreign-language (CFL) courses online. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 10, 52-71.

Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO, 21, 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.7-27

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem