- -

New concepts, different approaches: tackling e-visibility in research project websites

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

New concepts, different approaches: tackling e-visibility in research project websites

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Lorés-Sanz;Herran ...
Tamaño: 517.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Lorés-Sanz, Rosa es_ES
dc.contributor.author Herrando-Rodrigo, Isabel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-10T07:09:18Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-10T07:09:18Z
dc.date.issued 2020-07-01
dc.identifier.issn 1886-2438
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/147756
dc.description.abstract [EN] In the last few years, the web has become a privileged access platform for knowledge for an increasingly globalized society. Thus, digital platforms are currently used by researchers to strengthen the visibility of their research output as well as their own. In this study we explore the concept of e-visibility as a key notion in the current digital discursive practices within the scientific context. For such purposes we have focused on international research project websites as instances of such practices.The analysis undertaken is data-driven and has revealed the existence of various entities which are made visible by means of a combination of lexicogrammatical devices together with other modes afforded by the digital platforms. Results also show that there are various types of e-visibility emerging from the combination of the entities and the lexicogrammatical and visual resources used to make them visible. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] En los últimos años, la web se ha convertido en una excelente plataforma de acceso al conocimiento para nuestra sociedad, cada vez más globalizada. Por ello, los investigadores utilizan las plataformas digitales para fomentar tanto la visibilidad de sus resultados de investigación como la suya propia. En este artículo exploramos el concepto de visibilidad digital (e-visibilidad) como una noción clave en las prácticas discursivas digitales dentro del contexto científico. Para estudiar estas prácticas, hemos centrado nuestro análisis en sitios web de proyectos de investigación internacionales. El análisis realizado se basa en datos y revela la existencia de varias entidades que se hacen visibles mediante la combinación de estrategias lexicogramaticales con otros modos que sólo las plataformas digitales ponen al alcance. Nuestros resultados muestran la existencia de distintos tiposde visibilidad digital que emergen de la combinación de estas entidades con los recursos lexicogramaticales y visuales utilizados para hacerles visibles. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research has been funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI2017 84205-P), the Gobierno de Aragón (Spain) (H16_17R) and Ibercaja-Unizar (JIUZ-2018-HUM-03). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Digital scientific practices es_ES
dc.subject E-visibility es_ES
dc.subject Research project websites es_ES
dc.subject Lexicogrammatical devices es_ES
dc.subject Multimodality es_ES
dc.subject Prácticas científicas digitales es_ES
dc.subject Visibilidad digital es_ES
dc.subject Sitios web de proyectos de investigación es_ES
dc.subject Recursos lexicogramaticales es_ES
dc.subject Multimodalidad es_ES
dc.title New concepts, different approaches: tackling e-visibility in research project websites es_ES
dc.title.alternative Nuevos conceptos, distintos enfoques: una aproximación a la visibilidad digital (e-visibilidad) en sitios web de proyectos de investigación es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/rlyla.2020.12782
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/FFI2017-84205-P/ES/HACIA UNA MAYOR VISIBILIDAD Y DISEMINACION DE LA INVESTIGACION CIENTIFICA: ESTUDIO LINGUISTICO, RETORICO Y PRAGMATICO DE GENEROS DIGITALES EN INGLES COMO LENGUA INTERNACIONAL/
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Gobierno de Aragón//H16_17R/
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Fundación Bancaria Ibercaja//JIUZ-2018-HUM-03/
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Lorés-Sanz, R.; Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (2020). New concepts, different approaches: tackling e-visibility in research project websites. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 15(1):83-98. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2020.12782 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2020.12782 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 83 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 98 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 15 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1886-6298
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\12782 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Gobierno de Aragón es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Fundación Bancaria Ibercaja es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agencia Estatal de Investigación es_ES
dc.description.references Albalat-Mascarell, A., & Carrió-Pastor, M.L. (2019). "Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates." Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Barbour, K., & Marshall, P. (2012). "The Academic Online: Constructing Persona Through the World Wide Web." First Monday, 17/9. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.3969 es_ES
dc.description.references Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). "Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect." Text, 9, 93-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93 es_ES
dc.description.references Bordet, G. (2013). "The Rhetorical Role of 'Collocational Chains' and their Implications in the Building of Scientific Discourse Strategies." European Journal of English Studies, 17/3, 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.867183 es_ES
dc.description.references Breivega, K., Dahl, T., & Fløttum, K. (2002). "Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics." International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12/2, 218-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00032 es_ES
dc.description.references Charles, M. (2004). The Construction of Stance: A Corpus-based Investigation of Two Contrasting Disciplines. University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis. (Unpublished). es_ES
dc.description.references Crismore, A., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). "A review of recent metadiscourse studies: The Iranian context." Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9/2, 195-218. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.223 es_ES
dc.description.references Dahl, T. (2004). "Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?" Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807-1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2014). "Measuring the voice of disciplinarity in scientific writing: A longitudinal exploration of experienced writers in geology." English for Specific Purposes, 34, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.10.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrari, L. (2003). "Marcadores de modalidad epistémica en artículos de investigación." In M. García-Wegroni (ed.) Actas del Congreso Internacional La Argumentación. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística. Sociedad. Barcelona: Gedisa, 69-93. es_ES
dc.description.references Giannoni, D.S. (2010) "Metaphoric Values and Disciplinary Identity in English Research Articles." In G. Garzone & J. Archibald (eds.) Discourse, Identities and Roles in Specialized Communication. Linguistic Insights Vol. 125. Bern: Peter Lang, 279-298. es_ES
dc.description.references Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: OUP. es_ES
dc.description.references Gosden, H. (1993). "Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles." English for Specific Purposes, 11, 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80010-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Gotti, M. (2010). "Identity traits in written academic discourse across languages." In R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas, P. & E. Lafuente-Millán (eds.) Constructing Interpersonality. Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 49-60. es_ES
dc.description.references Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Harwood, N. (2005a). "Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that': A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines." Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1207-1231. es_ES
dc.description.references https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Harwood, N. (2005b). "'We do not seem to have a theory... the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap': inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing." Applied Linguistics, 26/3, 343-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012 es_ES
dc.description.references Henderson, W., & Hewings, A. (1990). "A language of model building." In T. Dudley-Evans & Henderson, W (eds.). The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse. London: Modern English Publication in Association with the British Council. ELT Documents 134: 43-54. es_ES
dc.description.references Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (2019). "Raising awareness around writers' voice in academic discourse. An analysis of writers' (in)visibility." Brno Studies in English, 45/2, 49-72. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2019-2-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Herring, S.C. (2012). "Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent." In D. Tannen & A. M. Tester (eds.) Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press, 1-25. es_ES
dc.description.references Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Language and Ideology. London/New York: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury. es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2010). "Community and Individuality: Performing Identity in Applied Linguistics." Written Communication, 27/2, 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309357846 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K., & Sancho, C. (2012). Stance and Voice in Academic Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825 es_ES
dc.description.references Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5 es_ES
dc.description.references Ivorra Pérez, F.M. (2015). "The impact of cultural dimensions and politeness on the engagement markers of Spanish, British and US business websites." In M. Hernández-López & L. Fernández-Amaya (eds.) Studies in Pragmatics 14: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters. Boston: Brill. Leiden, 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260160_008 es_ES
dc.description.references Ivorra Pérez, F.M. (2016). "Interpersonality and culture: an approach to the movie review genre." Odisea, 17, 159-183. es_ES
dc.description.references https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i17.358 es_ES
dc.description.references Jewitt, C. (ed.) (2013). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Jewitt, C. (2016). "Multimodal analysis." In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. London: Routledge,69-84. es_ES
dc.description.references John, S. (2005). The Writing Process and Writing Identity: Investigating the Influence of Revision on Linguistic and Textual Features of Writer Identity in Dissertations. UK: University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis (Unpublished). es_ES
dc.description.references Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social semiotic approach to communication. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034 es_ES
dc.description.references Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold. es_ES
dc.description.references Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 es_ES
dc.description.references Lewin, B. A. (1998). "Hedging: from and function in scientific research texts." In I. Fortanet & T. Dudley-Evans (eds.) Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes. Castelló de la Plana: Publicaciones de la Universitat Jaume I: 89-104. es_ES
dc.description.references Lorés-Sanz, R. (2008). "Authorial visibility in research article and research article abstracts: the intergeneric perspective." In S. Burgess & P. Martín-Martín (eds.) English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication. Berlin: Peter Lang, 105-122. es_ES
dc.description.references Lorés-Sanz, R. (2011a). "The construction of the author's voice in academic writing: the interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors." Text & Talk, 31/2, 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Lorés-Sanz, R. (2011b). "The study of authorial voice: using a Spanish-English corpus to explore linguistic transference." Corpora, 6/1, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0002 es_ES
dc.description.references Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lafuente Millán, E. (2010). Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Luzón, M.J. (2018). "Constructing academic identities online: Identity performance in research group blogs written by multilingual scholars." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, J.R. & White, M. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez, I.A. (2001). "Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity system." English for Specific Purposes, 20/3, 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez, I.A. (2005). "Native and non-native writer's use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English." Journal of Second Language Writing, 14/3, 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller, C.R. (2014). "Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later (2014)." Letras & Letras, 31/3, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.14393/LL63-v31n3a2015-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Mur-Dueñas, P., Lorés-Sanz, R., & Lafuente Millán, E. (2010). "Editorial." Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Special Issue on Interpersonality in Academic Writing), 9/2, 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). "Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse." English for Specific Purposes, 13/2, 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Salager-Meyer, F., Alcaraz-Ariza, M.A., & Zambrano, N. (2003). "The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930-1995)." English for Specific Purposes, 22/3, 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00019-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Stock, I., & Eik-Nes, N. (2016). "Voice features in academic texts - A review of empirical studies." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Linguistics: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell. es_ES
dc.description.references Suau-Jiménez, F. (2016). "What can the discursive construction of stance and engagement voices in traveler forums and tourism promotional websites bring to a cultural, cross-generic and disciplinary view of interpersonality?" Ibérica, 31, 199-220. es_ES
dc.description.references Suau-Jiménez, F., Lorés-Sanz, R., Mapelli, G., & Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (in press). "La interpersonalidad discursiva como propuesta alternativa al metadiscurso interpersonal." Onomázein, 54. es_ES
dc.description.references Tang, R. (2004). An Approach to Written Academic Voice: Exploring the Interpersonal Negotiations in Student Academic Writing Through APPRAISAL. University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis (Unpublished). es_ES
dc.description.references Tang, R. & John, S. (1999). "The 'I' in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun". English Specific Purposes, 18, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (2011). "Introduction. Fresh Perspectives on New Media Sociolinguistics." In C. Thurlow. & Mroczek, K. (eds.) Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xix-xliv. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001 es_ES
dc.description.references Turiman, S., Abdullah, N., & Noor, M. (2018). "Spoken metadiscourse in Malaysian ESL job interviews." Journal of Language Studies, 18/3, 135-152. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1803-08 es_ES
dc.description.references Wise, L. (2005). "Blogs versus discussion forums in postgraduate on line continuing medical education". BlogTalk conference paper. Sydney. es_ES
dc.description.references Yakhontova, T. (2006). "Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Yamamoto, M. (2006). Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.78 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem