- -

Teaching Technical English: Corrective Feedback Based on Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Teaching Technical English: Corrective Feedback Based on Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Chugai, Oksana es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ogienko, Olena es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-14T07:57:47Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-14T07:57:47Z
dc.date.issued 2021-04-01
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165115
dc.description.abstract [EN] The present study investigates the beliefs of students and teachers about corrective feedback (CF) regarding necessity, timing and the most effective types in technical English setting. This study was conducted at the National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” with students majoring in Information Technology, Mathematics or Physics ranged between 18 and 22 years of age. Methods included a questionnaire, interviews and classroom observations. The feedback from 55 students and 33 teachers was collected during practical classes in February – March at the beginning of the second semester of 2019-2020 academic year. This research has confirmed the necessity of CF for students and teachers. It also demonstrated the differences regarding timing: teachers preferred delayed to immediate CF, while students equally appreciated both. The research also indicated that both teachers and students preferred indirect types of CF; teachers had stronger attitudes though. The research demonstrated the most effective types of CF for students: meta-linguistic clue and repetition, while for teachers it was elicitation. Completing the survey, both teachers and students chose at least two different types of CF. The necessity of effective CF, which requires learning more about students’ and teachers’ beliefs, benefits and drawbacks of each CF type, is emphasized. The results of the present research may be used by practitioners, who would like to use CF effectively in teaching technical English. Future studies may explore CF in terms of students’ and teachers’ beliefs and behavior in different learning environments. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Corrective feedback (CF) es_ES
dc.subject Recast es_ES
dc.subject Explicit correction es_ES
dc.subject Meta-linguistic clue es_ES
dc.title Teaching Technical English: Corrective Feedback Based on Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/muse.2021.14016
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Chugai, O.; Ogienko, O. (2021). Teaching Technical English: Corrective Feedback Based on Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences. 8(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2021.14016 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2021.14016 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 12 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 8 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2341-2593
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\14016 es_ES
dc.description.references Basturkmen H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers' stated beliefs and practices. System, 40(2), 282-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Brown, A. (2009). Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x es_ES
dc.description.references Chugai, O. (2020). Providing Effective Corrective Feedback in ESP Class. Proceedings of the II Annual Conference on Current Foreign Languages Teaching Issues in Higher Education, 90-91. https://kamts2.kpi.ua/sites/default/files/img/i%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%2014.05.2020%281%29.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Chugai, O., Terenko, O., & Ogienko, O. (2017). Methods that work: best practices of adult educators in the USA. Advanced Education, 8, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.109216 es_ES
dc.description.references Dornyei, Z., Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553 es_ES
dc.description.references Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18. https://repositories.cdlib.org/uccllt/l2/vol1/iss1/art2/ - https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054 es_ES
dc.description.references Ellis, R. (2010). Cognitive, social, and psychological dimensions of corrective feedback. In R. Batstone (ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 151-165). Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Horwitz, E.K. (1990). Attending to the affective domain in the foreign language classroom. In S.Magnan (Ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learners (pp. 15-33). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. es_ES
dc.description.references Horwitz, E.K. (2015). Beliefs about language learning and the experience of second language learning: Asking useful questions about language learning. In H.M. McGarrell and D.Wood (Eds.), CONTACT-Refereed Proceedings of TESL Ontario Research Symposium, 41(2), (pp. 20-30). es_ES
dc.description.references Kartchava, E. (2016). Learners' beliefs about corrective feedback in the language classroom: perspectives from two international contexts. TESL Canada Journal 33(2), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v33i2.1235 es_ES
dc.description.references Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Li, S. (2013). Oral corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 68(2), 196-198. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct076 es_ES
dc.description.references Li, S. (2018). Corrective Feedback in L2 Speech Production. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0247 es_ES
dc.description.references Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. Modern Language Journal, 100, 276-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12315 es_ES
dc.description.references Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners' beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x es_ES
dc.description.references Lytovchenko, I., Lavrysh, Y., Lukianenko, V., & O. Ogienko, O. (2020). How to Teach Grammar to Adult ESP Learners at Technical University More Communicatively: Task-Based Approach. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 7(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2020.12419 es_ES
dc.description.references Lytovchenko, I., Ogienko, O., Sbruieva, A., & Sotska, H. (2018). Teaching English for specific purposes to adult learners at university: methods that work. Advanced Education, 10, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.149741 es_ES
dc.description.references Mori, R. (2002). Teachers' Beliefs and Corrective Feedback. JALT Journal, 24(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ24.1-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Russel, V. (2009). Corrective feedback, over a decade of research since Lyster & Ranta (1997): Where do we stand today? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(1), 21-31. https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/archive/v6n12009.html es_ES
dc.description.references Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA - Columbia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107 es_ES
dc.description.references Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching, a guide for guidebook for English language teachers. 2nd ed. Macmillan Education. es_ES
dc.description.references Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers' choice and learners' preference for corrective-feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.2167/la429.0 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang, L. J., Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners' anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem