- -

A mixed-methods study of online learning in the EFL classroom

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A mixed-methods study of online learning in the EFL classroom

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Giron-GarciaBoghi ...
Tamaño: 6.785Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Girón-García, Carolina es_ES
dc.contributor.author Boghiu-Balaur, Sorina es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-12T07:25:14Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-12T07:25:14Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07-08
dc.identifier.issn 1886-2438
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/169081
dc.description.abstract [EN] The need to adapt classroom materials to maintain students’ interest to learn the subject matter in an engaging environment, by means of Information and Communication Technologies, becomes a first concern. The purpose of this mixed-methods study, which involves a combination of both qualitative and quantitative data analyses, is to survey the perceptions and engagement of higher education students as regards learning theoretical content and vocabulary through the implementation of two online called ‘Cybertasks’. The participants were administered two perception questionnaires in order to gather information concerning their previous knowledge and their acquired knowledge. Additionally, a final written exam was delivered to determine whether there is a correlation between students’ satisfaction with Cybertask completion and their academic achievement. The results indicate that students with higher levels of engagement towards the use of the Cybertask to improve their acquisition of theoretical content and vocabulary showed higher academic achievement in their final exam.  es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study was supported financially by the following Action Research Projects carried out at Universitat Jaume I: “Innovació educativa i interdisciplinarietat: ensenyament de l’anglès a l’aula universitària amb l’aplicació d’una “Lesson” integrada a la plataforma Moodle” (3820/20), “Disseny d’entrades en diccionaris online d’especialitat per a l’ensenyament de AFE” (3860/20), “Aprofitament de la ferramenta “Google Sites” per a l’ensenyament de l’anglès a l’aula universitària: Desenvolupament de l’aprenentatge autònom dins del context de la COVID-19” (3949/21), “Creació d’una base de dades multinivell per a secundar el desenvolupament de la competència escrita a l’estudiantat del Grau en Estudis Anglesos” (3975/21) The research conducted in this article is also part of the following Research Project carried out at Universitat Jaume I: UJI-B2018-59. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Content-based instruction es_ES
dc.subject Task-based language teaching es_ES
dc.subject Information and communication technologies es_ES
dc.subject Cybertask es_ES
dc.subject Students’ perceptions es_ES
dc.title A mixed-methods study of online learning in the EFL classroom es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/rlyla.2021.13950
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UJI//3820%2F20/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UJI//3949%2F21/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UJI//3975%2F21/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Girón-García, C.; Boghiu-Balaur, S. (2021). A mixed-methods study of online learning in the EFL classroom. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 16(1):95-122. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2021.13950 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2021.13950 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 95 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 122 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 16 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1886-6298
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\13950 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Jaume I es_ES
dc.description.references Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L. & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386, https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303 es_ES
dc.description.references Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O. & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 126-150, https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477 es_ES
dc.description.references Bond M., Buntins K., Bedenlier S., Zawacki-Richter O. & Kerres M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 17:2, 1-30, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Brinton, D.M. & Snow, M. A. (2017). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. In M.A. Snow & D.M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 2-20). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Clark R. C. & Mayer R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086 es_ES
dc.description.references Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. es_ES
dc.description.references Dennis, A. R., Abaci, S., Morrone, A. S., Plaskoff, J. & McNamara, K. O. (2016). Effects of e-textbook instructor annotations on learner performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(2), 221-235, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9109-x es_ES
dc.description.references Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning & Leading with Technology, 28(8), 6-9, 58. es_ES
dc.description.references Dunn, T.J. & Kennedy, M. (2019). Technology enhanced learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 137. pp. 104-137. ISSN 0360-1315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Fincham, D. (2013). Introducing online learning in higher education: An evaluation. Creative Education, 4(9), 540-548, https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.49079 es_ES
dc.description.references Gimeno Sanz, A.M. (2014). Fostering Learning Autonomy in Technology-Enhanced ESP Courses. In: E. Bárcena, T. Read & J. Arús (eds.), Languages for Specific Purposes in the Digital Era, pp. 27-44. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02222-2_2 es_ES
dc.description.references Girón-García. C. (2013). Learning Styles and Reading Modes in the Development of Language Learning Autonomy through 'Cybertasks'. ISBN 978-84-695-9179-6. Barcelona. Ed. Universitat Jaume I. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/125440 es_ES
dc.description.references Girón-García, C. & Silvestre-López, A.J. (2019). Students' self-perception of motivation regarding a Cybertask integrating different types of online resources in the ESP classroom. International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED). pp. 4120-4126. ISSN: 2340-1079. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1032 es_ES
dc.description.references Goh, F. C., Leong, M. C., Kasmin, K., Hii, K. P. & Tan, K. O. (2017). Students' experiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2), 117-128, https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1298 es_ES
dc.description.references González-Lloret, M. (2016). A Practical Guide to Integrating Technology into Task-based Language Teaching. Washington D.C. Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_16-1 es_ES
dc.description.references González-Vera, P. (2016). The e-generation: the use of technology for foreign language learning. In A. Pareja-Lora, C. Calle-Martínez, & P. Rodríguez-Arancón (Eds), New perspectives on teaching and working with languages in the digital era (pp. 51-61). Dublin: Research-publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Hinkelman, D. (2018). Blending technologies in second language classroom. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53686-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers (2nd Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521484952 (paperback). es_ES
dc.description.references Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, H.J., Hong, A.J. & Song, H. (2019). The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students' achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16:21, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0152-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C. & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170-179). Leuven, Belgium: (LAK' 13) Association for Computing Machinery, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330 es_ES
dc.description.references Kokoç, M., Ilgaz, H. & Altun, A. (2020). Individual cognitive differences and student engagement in video lectures and e-learning environments. In E. Alqurashi (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Fostering Student Engagement with Instructional Technology in Higher Education (pp. 78-93). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0119-1.ch005 es_ES
dc.description.references Krahnke, K. (1987). Approaches to Syllabus Design for Foreign Language Teaching, Language in Education: Theory and Practice, No. 67. [Washington, D.C.] Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1987, 105 p. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED283385 es_ES
dc.description.references Krause, K-L. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. Centre for the Study of Higher Education: University of Melbourne. Engaged, inert or otherwise occupied? Deconstructing the 21st century undergraduate student at the James Cook University Symposium 2005, Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students, James Cook University, Townsville/Cairns, Queensland, 21-22 September 2005. es_ES
dc.description.references Lei, H., Cui, Y. & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 46(3), 517-528, https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054 es_ES
dc.description.references Levitt, R. & Piro, J. M. (2016). Innovation in education through web-based instruction: Digital and cross-platform storytelling. In M. Raisinghani (Ed.), Revolutionizing Education through Web-Based Instruction (pp. 131-144). Hershey, PA: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9932-8.ch008 es_ES
dc.description.references Lightbown, P. M. (2014). Focus on Content-Based Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Long, M. H. (2016). In defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5-33. Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000057 es_ES
dc.description.references Luzón, M.J, Ruiz-Madrid, M.N. & Villanueva, M.L. (Eds.) (2010). Digital genres, new literacies and autonomy in language learning. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Lyster, R. (2018). Content-Based language teaching. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315103037 es_ES
dc.description.references McLaughlin, M., McGrath, D. J., Burian-Fitzgerald, M. A., Lanahan, L., Scotchmer, M., Enyeart, C. & Salganik, L. (2005). Student content engagement as a construct for the çmeasurement of effective classroom instruction and teacher knowledge. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Available at http://www.air.org/files/AERA2005Student_Content_Engagement11.pdf https://doi.org/10.1037/e539752012-001 es_ES
dc.description.references Martin, F. & Bolliger, D. (2018). Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222, https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 es_ES
dc.description.references Navarro-Coy, M. & Silvestre-López, A.J. (2010). The CIBERTAAAL Project: Helping Students Become Wreaders. In Digital genres, new literacies and autonomy in language learning. Luzón, M.J, Ruiz-Madrid, M.N., & Villanueva, M.L. (Ed.) (pp. 101-125) Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Perea-Barberá, M.D., & Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2014). Promoting Specialised Vocabulary Learning Through ComputerAssisted Instruction. E. Bárcena, T. Read & J. Arús (eds.), Languages for Specific Purposes in the Digital Era, pp. 129-154. Cham: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02222-2_7 es_ES
dc.description.references Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 es_ES
dc.description.references Prensky, M. (2017). The changing ends and paradigm for education in the World. WISE Education Review, 1, 1-3. es_ES
dc.description.references Reaburn, P., Muldoon, N. & Bookallil, C. (2009). Blended spaces, work based learning and constructive alignment: Impacts on student engagement. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE 2009 (pp. 820-831). es_ES
dc.description.references Richards, Jack. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Richards, J. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305.021 es_ES
dc.description.references Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge university press. es_ES
dc.description.references Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). London: Longman (Pearson Education Limited). es_ES
dc.description.references Rovai, A. P., Ponton, M. K., Wighting, M. J. & Baker, J. D. (2007). A comparative analysis of student motivation in traditional classroom and e-learning courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6, 413- 432. es_ES
dc.description.references Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C. & Chase, A.-M. (2017). Print versus digital texts: understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies. Research in Learning Technology, 25, https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1976 es_ES
dc.description.references Sokolik M. E. (2014). Digital technology in language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia, D.M. Brinton & M.A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language pp.409-422) (4th ed.). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning/ Heinle Cengage Learning. es_ES
dc.description.references Stryker, S. & Leaver, B. (1997). Content-Based Instruction in Foreign Language Education: Models and Methods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Suárez-Vilagran, M.D.M.S. (2012). Learner autonomy in e-portfolios: from ambitious learning objectives to downto-earth outcomes. Revista del Congrés Internacional de Docència Universitària i Innovació, 1/1. es_ES
dc.description.references Taillefer, L. (2018). A Business English Course in the Digital Era: Design and Analysis. R. Muñoz-Luna & L. Taillefer (eds.), Integrating Information and Communication Technologies in English for Specific Purposes, pp. 165- 182. Cham: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68926-5_11 es_ES
dc.description.references Tavakoli H., Lotfi A. R., Biria R. & Wang S. (Reviewing editor) (2019). Effects of CALL-mediated TBLT on motivation for L2 reading. Cogent Education, 6:1, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1580916 es_ES
dc.description.references Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage, London. es_ES
dc.description.references UNESCO (2016). Futures for ICT and higher education: Changes due to the use of open content. Retrieved from: https://iite.unesco.org/publications/3214745/ es_ES
dc.description.references Ushioda, E. (2016). Language learning motivation through a small lens: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 49 (4), pp. 564-577, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000173 es_ES
dc.description.references Vanichvasin, P. (2019). Effects of Content-Based Instruction on English language performance of Thai undergraduate students in a non-English program. English Language Teaching, 12:8, pp.20-29, 10 pp. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n8p20 es_ES
dc.description.references Yu, W. & Du, X. (2019). Implementation of a blended learning model in Content- Based EFL curriculum. International Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Learning (IJET), 14(05), pp. 188-199, Kassel, Germany: International Association of Online Engineering, Available at https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208407/ https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.8546 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem