- -

The "I" in interaction: authorial presence in academic writing

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The "I" in interaction: authorial presence in academic writing

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 1162-4692-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 240.5Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Chavez Munoz, Monica es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-23T11:19:15Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-23T11:19:15Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07
dc.identifier.issn 1886-2438
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/31321
dc.description.abstract [EN] This study explores the discourse functions of personal pronouns and verb forms referring to writer and reader interaction in a corpus of 60 research articles in the fields of linguistics, psychology and educational research in English and Spanish. Drawing on Tang and John¿s (1999) taxonomy I elaborate and refine their categories, and propose I as the Interpreter as a new role in the continuum of writers¿ authorial presence. The analysis reveals that both English and Spanish writers make extensive use of pronominal discourse functions. However, Spanish writers use them more sparingly and prefer different functions when signalling their presence such as pointing to their role as interpreters of data rather than recounters of the research process or originators of an original contribution to the field. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship I am endlessly thankful and indebted to Geoff Thompson for his diligent supervision during my research. His knowledge and support have made the completion of this study possible. I am also grateful to the National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico for funding this study
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Research articles es_ES
dc.subject Personal pronouns es_ES
dc.subject Contrastive linguistics es_ES
dc.title The "I" in interaction: authorial presence in academic writing es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2013-07-23T10:22:30Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/rlyla.2013.1162
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Chavez Munoz, M. (2013). The "I" in interaction: authorial presence in academic writing. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 8(1):49-58. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1162 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1162 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 49 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 58 es_ES
dc.description.volume 8
dc.description.issue 1
dc.identifier.eissn 1886-6298
dc.contributor.funder Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México
dc.description.references Bakhtin, M. (1981). "The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin" in M. Holquist, trans. by C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001) Academic tribes andterritories: Intellectual enquiry and theculture of disciplines. Buckingham: SHRE & Open University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Bernhardt, S. A. (1985). "The writer, the reader and the scientific text". Journal of Technical Writingand Communication, 15, 163-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/X9D9-V33E-REN0-PDQM es_ES
dc.description.references Bolivar,A. (1986). Interaction through written text: a discourse analysis ofnewspaper editorials. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham. es_ES
dc.description.references Bolivar, A. (2001). "The negotiation of evaluation in written text" in M. Scott & G. Thompson (eds.), Patternsoftext, 129-158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. es_ES
dc.description.references Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Crismore, A. (1983). Metadiscourse: What is it and how is it used in school and non school socialscience texts. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois. es_ES
dc.description.references Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang. es_ES
dc.description.references Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). "Metadiscourse in popular andprofessional science discourse" in W. Nash (ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse, 118-136. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. es_ES
dc.description.references Davies, F. (1994). "From writer roles to elements of the text: Interactive, organisational and topical" in L. Barbara and M. Scott (eds.), Reflections on language learning, 170-183. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. es_ES
dc.description.references Gea-Valor, M.L. (2010). "The emergence of the author's voice in bookreviewing: A contrastive study of academic vs. non-academic discourse." In Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas and E. Lafuente-Millán (eds.), 117-136. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge. es_ES
dc.description.references Harwood, N. (2003). Person markers and interpersonal metadiscourse in academic writing: A multidisciplinary corpus based study of expert and student texts. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University College, Kent. es_ES
dc.description.references Harwood, N. (2005a). "Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that". A corpus based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1207-1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Harwood, N. (2005b). "I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever': Discussing methods in computing science using I". English for Specific Purposes, 24, 243-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.10.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Harwood, N. (2005c). 'We do not seem to have a theory…. The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap': Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343-375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012 es_ES
dc.description.references Hickey, L. (2005). Politeness in Spain: Thanks but no thanks. In L. Hickey, & M. Stewart (Eds.), Politeness in Europe(pp. 317-330), Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. es_ES
dc.description.references Hoey, M.(2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2001). "Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles". English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207-226. es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2002). "Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing". Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing.London: Continum es_ES
dc.description.references Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. es_ES
dc.description.references Kuo, C.H. (1999). "The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles". English for Specific Purposes, 18,121-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinez, I. A. (2005). "Native and non native writers' use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English". Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 174-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001 es_ES
dc.description.references McCarthy, M. (1993). "Spoken discourse markers in written text" in J. M.Sinclair, M. Hoey, & G. Fox. (eds.), Techniques of Description, 170-182. London: Routledge es_ES
dc.description.references McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. Harlow: Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Molino, A. (2010). "Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian Linguistics research articles".Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 86-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Mur-Dueñas, P. (2007). "I/wefocus on': A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles". Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6,143-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity betweenwriters and readers.Orlando: Academic Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Nystrand, M. (1989). "A social interactive model of writing".Written Communication, 6,66-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088389006001005 es_ES
dc.description.references Sheldon, E. (2009). "From one I to another: Discursive construction of self-representation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles". English for Specific Purposes, 28, 251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Starfield, S. & Ravelli, L.J.(2006). "The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist': Self and structure in New Humanities research theses". Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 222-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting. Glasgow: CUP. es_ES
dc.description.references Tang, R., & John, S (1999). "The I in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through first person pronoun". English for Specific Purposes,18,23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillet, S., & Icke, V. (1998). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 123-140. es_ES
dc.description.references Thompson, G. & Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse. Text,15,103-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103 es_ES
dc.description.references Vande Kopple, W. (1985). "Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse". College Composition and Communication, 36, 83-93. es_ES
dc.description.references Vassileva, I. (1998). "Who am I / who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian". InternationalJournal of Applied Linguistics 8, 163-90 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem