- -

Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared

Show full item record

Ruiz Moneva, MA. (2013). Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 8(1):76-92. doi:10.4995/rlyla.2013.1245.

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/31327

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared
Author: Ruiz Moneva, Mª Angeles
Issued date:
Abstract:
[EN] In this study I have analysed a selection of judgments of courts of appellate jurisdiction of the Spanish and English legal systems. The aim is to trace the main discourse and rhetorical similarities and differences ...[+]
Subjects: Cognition , Context , Discourse genres , Text types , Argumentative texts , Judgments (Spanish Vs British English) , Purpose , Cultural contrasts , Linguistic contrasts
Copyrigths: Reserva de todos los derechos
Source:
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. (issn: 1886-2438 ) (eissn: 1886-6298 )
DOI: 10.4995/rlyla.2013.1245
Publisher:
Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1245
Type: Artículo

References

A) Internet sites of the judgments consulted

BAILII: British and Irish Legal Information Institute: http://www.bailii.org [Last accessed: 04.10.2012]

Buscador de Jurisprudencia: Consejo General del Poder Judicial: CENDOJ: http://www.poderjudicial.es/search/indexAN.jsp [Last accessed: 04.10.2012] [+]
A) Internet sites of the judgments consulted

BAILII: British and Irish Legal Information Institute: http://www.bailii.org [Last accessed: 04.10.2012]

Buscador de Jurisprudencia: Consejo General del Poder Judicial: CENDOJ: http://www.poderjudicial.es/search/indexAN.jsp [Last accessed: 04.10.2012]

B) Bibliographic references consulted

Alcaraz Varó, E. 2001 (1994). El inglés jurídico. Madrid: Ariel Derecho (5ª ed.).

Alcaraz Varó, E. and B. Hughes (2002a). Legal Translation Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.

Alcaraz Varó, E. and B. Hughes (2002b). El español jurídico. Barcelona: Ariel Derecho.

Alcaraz Varó, E. and B. Hughes 2007 (1993). Diccionario de términos jurídicos. Inglés-Español, Español-Inglés. Barcelona: Ariel Referencia (10ª ed.).

Alcaraz Varó, E. et al. 2002 (2001). El inglés jurídico norteamericano. Barcelona: Ariel Derecho (2ª ed.).

Álvarez Calleja, Mª A. (1994). Traducción Jurídica Inglés-Español. Madrid: UNED.

Berk-Seligson, S. 2002 (1990). The Bilingual Courtroom. Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process with a New Chapter. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bhatia, V.K. (1987). Language of the law. Language Teaching 20 (3): 227-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026144480000464X

Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Bix, B. (1993). Law, Language and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Borja Albi, A. (2000). El texto jurídico inglés y su traducción al español. Barcelona: Ariel Lenguas Modernas.

Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987 (1978). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Casanovas, P. (1999). Pragmatics and Legal Culture: A General Framework. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma, Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials.

Comisión de Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico: Recomendaciones de la Comisión de Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico

http://www.mjusticia.gob.es/cs/Satellite/es/1288775399001/MuestraInformacion.html

Enright, C. (1983). Studying Law. Sydney: Branxton Press.

Garner, B. A. (1991). The Elements of Legal Style. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP.

Gibbons, J. 2005 (2003). Forensic Linguistics. An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gibbons, J. (2006). Forensic Sociolinguistics/ Forensische Soziolinguistik. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill (eds.). Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, 2nd completely revised and extended edition, Volume 3, 2316-2322. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Gibbons, J. and M.T. Turell, eds. (2008). Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Goodrich, P. (1986). Reading the Law. A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.

Goodrich, P. (1987). Legal Discourse. Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis. London: Macmillan.

Goodrich, P. (1990). Languages of Law. From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson -Law in Context.

Gunarsson, B.L. (2008). Professional communication. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. 2nd Edition. Volume 4: Second and Foreign Language Education. 83-95. Eds. N. Van Deusen-Scholl and N. H. Hornberger. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Levi, E. (1949). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Maley, Y. (1985). Judicial discourse: the case of the legal judgment. Festschrift in Honour of Arthur Delbridge. Beiträge zur Phonetik und Linguistik 48: 159-173.

Mellinkoff, D. 1994 (1963). The Language of the Law. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown & Co.

Nekvapil, J. (2006). The development of Languages for Special Purposes. Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Eds. U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill. 2nd completely revised and extended edition, Volume 3, 2223-2232. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Plain English Campaign: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/ [Last accessed: 04.10.2012]

Poor, H. (1971). You and the Law. Pleasantville, New York: R.D.A.

Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States: http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2010RulesoftheCourt.pdf

San Ginés Aguilar, P. and E. Ortega Arjonilla (eds.). (1996). Introducción a la traducción jurídica y jurada (inglés-español). Granada: Comares.

Shuy, R. (2006). Discourse Analysis and the Law / Diskursanalyse and Recht. Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Eds. U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill. 2nd completely revised and extended edition, Volume 3, 2323-2333. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trimble, L. (1985). English for Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Uniform Law Commission: [National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws]: http://www.uniformlaws.org/ [Last accessed: 04.10.2012]

Vázquez Orta Orta, I. (2010). A Genre-based View of Judgments of Appellate Courts in the Common Law System. Legal Discourses Across Languages and Cultures. Eds. Maurizio Gotti and Christopher Williams. 263-284. Berlin and New York: Peter Lang.

[-]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record