- -

Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 1245-4696-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 294.3Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Ruiz Moneva, Mª Angeles es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-23T12:01:12Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-23T12:01:12Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07
dc.identifier.issn 1886-2438
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/31327
dc.description.abstract [EN] In this study I have analysed a selection of judgments of courts of appellate jurisdiction of the Spanish and English legal systems. The aim is to trace the main discourse and rhetorical similarities and differences that may be appreciated in this textual genre in the two cultures concerned. The reasons why I have focused on this genre have to do with its recurrence and importance in the most important branches of the legal system, and also with the fact that judgments of appellate courts necessarily involve references to other previous legal documents. At the same time, the Spanish and the English legal systems stand for representative instances of two very different models ¿the continental model, inheritor of the Roman tradition, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the common-law system. The paper will explore the ways in which these judgments illustrate the main features of Spanish or English legal language, respectively, and will analyse how impersonal and interpersonal aspects are covered in the judgments issued in each of these legal systems. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Cognition es_ES
dc.subject Context es_ES
dc.subject Discourse genres es_ES
dc.subject Text types es_ES
dc.subject Argumentative texts es_ES
dc.subject Judgments (Spanish Vs British English) es_ES
dc.subject Purpose es_ES
dc.subject Cultural contrasts es_ES
dc.subject Linguistic contrasts es_ES
dc.title Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2013-07-23T07:34:09Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/rlyla.2013.1245
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Ruiz Moneva, MA. (2013). Cognition and context of legal texts: spanish and english judgments compared. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 8(1):76-92. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1245 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1245 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 76 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 92 es_ES
dc.description.volume 8
dc.description.issue 1
dc.identifier.eissn 1886-6298
dc.description.references A) Internet sites of the judgments consulted es_ES
dc.description.references BAILII: British and Irish Legal Information Institute: http://www.bailii.org [Last accessed: 04.10.2012] es_ES
dc.description.references Buscador de Jurisprudencia: Consejo General del Poder Judicial: CENDOJ: http://www.poderjudicial.es/search/indexAN.jsp [Last accessed: 04.10.2012] es_ES
dc.description.references B) Bibliographic references consulted es_ES
dc.description.references Alcaraz Varó, E. 2001 (1994). El inglés jurídico. Madrid: Ariel Derecho (5ª ed.). es_ES
dc.description.references Alcaraz Varó, E. and B. Hughes (2002a). Legal Translation Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome. es_ES
dc.description.references Alcaraz Varó, E. and B. Hughes (2002b). El español jurídico. Barcelona: Ariel Derecho. es_ES
dc.description.references Alcaraz Varó, E. and B. Hughes 2007 (1993). Diccionario de términos jurídicos. Inglés-Español, Español-Inglés. Barcelona: Ariel Referencia (10ª ed.). es_ES
dc.description.references Alcaraz Varó, E. et al. 2002 (2001). El inglés jurídico norteamericano. Barcelona: Ariel Derecho (2ª ed.). es_ES
dc.description.references Álvarez Calleja, Mª A. (1994). Traducción Jurídica Inglés-Español. Madrid: UNED. es_ES
dc.description.references Berk-Seligson, S. 2002 (1990). The Bilingual Courtroom. Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process with a New Chapter. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Bhatia, V.K. (1987). Language of the law. Language Teaching 20 (3): 227-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026144480000464X es_ES
dc.description.references Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Bix, B. (1993). Law, Language and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Borja Albi, A. (2000). El texto jurídico inglés y su traducción al español. Barcelona: Ariel Lenguas Modernas. es_ES
dc.description.references Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987 (1978). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Casanovas, P. (1999). Pragmatics and Legal Culture: A General Framework. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma, Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials. es_ES
dc.description.references Comisión de Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico: Recomendaciones de la Comisión de Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico es_ES
dc.description.references http://www.mjusticia.gob.es/cs/Satellite/es/1288775399001/MuestraInformacion.html es_ES
dc.description.references Enright, C. (1983). Studying Law. Sydney: Branxton Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Garner, B. A. (1991). The Elements of Legal Style. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP. es_ES
dc.description.references Gibbons, J. 2005 (2003). Forensic Linguistics. An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell. es_ES
dc.description.references Gibbons, J. (2006). Forensic Sociolinguistics/ Forensische Soziolinguistik. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill (eds.). Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, 2nd completely revised and extended edition, Volume 3, 2316-2322. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. es_ES
dc.description.references Gibbons, J. and M.T. Turell, eds. (2008). Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. es_ES
dc.description.references Goodrich, P. (1986). Reading the Law. A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques. Oxford and New York: Blackwell. es_ES
dc.description.references Goodrich, P. (1987). Legal Discourse. Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis. London: Macmillan. es_ES
dc.description.references Goodrich, P. (1990). Languages of Law. From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson -Law in Context. es_ES
dc.description.references Gunarsson, B.L. (2008). Professional communication. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. 2nd Edition. Volume 4: Second and Foreign Language Education. 83-95. Eds. N. Van Deusen-Scholl and N. H. Hornberger. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. es_ES
dc.description.references Levi, E. (1949). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Maley, Y. (1985). Judicial discourse: the case of the legal judgment. Festschrift in Honour of Arthur Delbridge. Beiträge zur Phonetik und Linguistik 48: 159-173. es_ES
dc.description.references Mellinkoff, D. 1994 (1963). The Language of the Law. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown & Co. es_ES
dc.description.references Nekvapil, J. (2006). The development of Languages for Special Purposes. Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Eds. U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill. 2nd completely revised and extended edition, Volume 3, 2223-2232. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. es_ES
dc.description.references Plain English Campaign: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/ [Last accessed: 04.10.2012] es_ES
dc.description.references Poor, H. (1971). You and the Law. Pleasantville, New York: R.D.A. es_ES
dc.description.references Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States: http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2010RulesoftheCourt.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references San Ginés Aguilar, P. and E. Ortega Arjonilla (eds.). (1996). Introducción a la traducción jurídica y jurada (inglés-español). Granada: Comares. es_ES
dc.description.references Shuy, R. (2006). Discourse Analysis and the Law / Diskursanalyse and Recht. Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Eds. U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K.J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill. 2nd completely revised and extended edition, Volume 3, 2323-2333. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. es_ES
dc.description.references Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Trimble, L. (1985). English for Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Uniform Law Commission: [National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws]: http://www.uniformlaws.org/ [Last accessed: 04.10.2012] es_ES
dc.description.references Vázquez Orta Orta, I. (2010). A Genre-based View of Judgments of Appellate Courts in the Common Law System. Legal Discourses Across Languages and Cultures. Eds. Maurizio Gotti and Christopher Williams. 263-284. Berlin and New York: Peter Lang. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem