- -

Competitiveness measurement system in the advertising sector

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Competitiveness measurement system in the advertising sector

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Poveda Bautista, Rocio es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Melón, Mónica es_ES
dc.contributor.author Baptista, Doris C. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-12-03T12:42:55Z
dc.date.available 2015-12-03T12:42:55Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.issn 2193-1801
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/58500
dc.description.abstract In this paper a new approach to find indicators that can be used to measure companies’ competitiveness and performance in an efficient and reliable way is presented. The aim is to assist managers of companies within a specific industrial sector by providing information about their relative position in the market so as to define better action plans that may improve the company’s performance. The approach combines the use of the Analytic Network Process, a multicriteria decision method, with the Balanced Scorecard. It allows the definition of a number of competitiveness indicators based on the performance and setting of the advertising sector. In this way it is possible to obtain a Competitiveness Index that allows a company to know its relative position with respect to other companies in the sector, and establish a ranking of the companies ordered by their competitiveness level. A case study in the advertising industry of Venezuela is provided. Results show that improvement plans for the agencies analyzed should promote creativity, innovation and the use of new technologies, as a particular form of innovation. These factors were considered to be the most relevant indicators in the advertising sector. The participating experts agreed that the methodology is useful and an improvement over current competitiveness assessment methods. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher SpringerOpen es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof SpringerPlus es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Competitiveness measurement system es_ES
dc.subject Measurement indicators es_ES
dc.subject Advertising es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Analytic Network Process (ANP) es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Competitiveness measurement system in the advertising sector es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/2193-1801-2-438
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Poveda Bautista, R.; García Melón, M.; Baptista, DC. (2013). Competitiveness measurement system in the advertising sector. SpringerPlus. 2(438):1-14. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-438 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.3292910.1186/2193-1801-2-438 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 14 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 2 es_ES
dc.description.issue 438 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 256136 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 24505555 en_EN
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC3909146 en_EN
dc.description.references Augusto M, Lisboa J, Yasin M, Figueira JR: Benchmarking in a multiple criteria performance context: An application and a conceptual framework. Eur J Oper Res 2008, 184(1):244-254. 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.052 es_ES
dc.description.references Barba-Romero S, Pomerol J: Decisiones Multicriterio. Fundamentos Teóricos y Utilización Práctica. Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid; 1997. es_ES
dc.description.references Bell JA: Creativity, commercial popularity, and advertising expenditures. International journal of advertising 1992, 11: 165-183. es_ES
dc.description.references Belton V, Stewart T: Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston; 2002. es_ES
dc.description.references Boojihawon D: Network dynamics and the internationalisation process of small advertising agencies. The Service Industries Journal 2007, 27(6):809-829. 10.1080/02642060701453304 es_ES
dc.description.references Ding J, Qiu J: An Approach to Improve the Indicator Weights of Scientific and Technological Competitiveness Evaluation of Chinese Universities. Scientometrics 2010, 86(2):285-297. es_ES
dc.description.references Durkin M, Lawlor MA: The implications of the Internet on the advertising agency-client relationship. The Service Industries Journal 2001, 21(2):175-190. 10.1080/714005026 es_ES
dc.description.references Ellis S, Elnatha D, Raz T: Applying benchmarking: an organizational learning perspective. Human System Management 2002, 21(3):183-191. es_ES
dc.description.references Grigoroudis E, Orfanoudaki E, Zopounidis C: Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard. Omega 2012, 40(1):104-119. 10.1016/j.omega.2011.04.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Hermelin B: Producer service firms in globalising cities: the example of advertising firms in Stockholm. The Service Industries Journal 2009, 29(4):457-471. 10.1080/02642060802304828 es_ES
dc.description.references Hertog P, Aa W, Jong M: Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management 2010, 21(4):490-514. 10.1108/09564231011066123 es_ES
dc.description.references Hipp C, Grupp H: Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Res Policy 2005, 34: 517-535. 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Hsu CW, Hu A, Chiou C, Chen TC: Using the FDM and ANP to construct a sustainability balanced scorecard for the semiconductor industry. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38(10):12891-12899. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.082 es_ES
dc.description.references Hult G, Snow C, Kandermir D: The Role of Entrepreneurship in Building Cultural Competitiveness in Different Organizational Types. J Manag 2003, 29(3):401-426. es_ES
dc.description.references Jalali Naini SG, Aliahmadia AR, Jafari-Eskandaria M: Designing a mixed performance measurement system for environmental supply chain management using evolutionary game theory and Balanced Scorecard: A case study of an auto industry supply chain. Resour Conserv Recycl 2010, 55(6):593-603. es_ES
dc.description.references Jeffcutt P, Pratt AC: Managing Creativity in the Cultural Industries. Creativity and Innovation Management 2002, 11: 225-233. 10.1111/1467-8691.00254 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaplan R, Norton D: Cuadro de Mando Integral. Ediciones Gestión, S.A., Barcelona; 2000. es_ES
dc.description.references Keeney R, Raiffa H: Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and values tradeoffs. John Wiley, New York; 1976. es_ES
dc.description.references Ko H-T, Lu H-P: Measuring innovation competencies for integrated services in the communications industry. Journal of Service Management 2010, 21(2):162-190. 10.1108/09564231011039277 es_ES
dc.description.references Lampel J, Lant T, Shamsie J: Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organ Sci 2000, 11: 263-269. 10.1287/orsc.11.3.263.12503 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee A, Chen H, Tong Y: Developing new products in a network with efficiency and innovation. Int J Prod Res 2008a, 46(17):4687-4707. 10.1080/00207540701233484 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee A, Chen W-C, Chang C-J: A Fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 2008b, 34(1):96-107. 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Leung LC, Lam KC, Cao D: Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process. J Oper Res Soc 2006, 57(6):682-691. 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040 es_ES
dc.description.references Liedtka S: Analytic Hierarchy Process and multi-criteria performance management systems. Cost Management 2005, 19(6):30-38. es_ES
dc.description.references Lightfoot HW, Gebauer H: Exploring the alignment between service strategy and service innovation. Journal of Service Management 2011, 22(5):664-683. 10.1108/09564231111175004 es_ES
dc.description.references Lin Y-H, Tsai K-M, Shiang W-J, Kuo T-C, Tsai C-H: Research on using ANP to establish a performance assessment model for business intelligence systems. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36(2):4135-4146. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Nachum L: Winners and losers in professional service industries: What makes the difference? The Service Industries Journal 1996, 16(4):474-490. 10.1080/02642069600000042 es_ES
dc.description.references Öztayşi B, Uçal Ĭ: Comparing MADM Techniques For Use In Performance Measurement. ISAHP 2009 Proceedings. The 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. July 29- August 1, 2009. Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2009, 53-64. es_ES
dc.description.references Öztayşi B, Kaya T, Kahraman C: Performance comparison based on customer relationship management using analytic network process. Expert Syst Appl 2011, 38(8):9788-9798. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.170 es_ES
dc.description.references Porter M: Ventaja Competitiva. Cecsa, Buenos Aires; 1995. es_ES
dc.description.references Porter M: Estrategia Competitiva. Cecsa, México D.F; 1997. es_ES
dc.description.references Poveda-Bautista R, Baptista D, García-Melón M: Setting competitiveness indicators using BSC and ANP. Int J Prod Res 2012, 50(17):4738-4752. 10.1080/00207543.2012.657964 es_ES
dc.description.references Pratt AC: Advertising and creativity, a governance approach: a case study of creative agencies in London. Environment and Planning A 2006, 38(10):1883-1899. 10.1068/a38261 es_ES
dc.description.references Raisinghani HS, Meade L, Schkade L: Strategic e-business decision analysis using Analytic Network Process. IEEE transactions on Engineering Management 2007, 54(4):673-686. es_ES
dc.description.references Reisinger H, Cravens K, Tell N: Prioritizing performance measures within the Balanced Scorecard framework. Manag Int Rev 2003, 43(4):429-437. es_ES
dc.description.references Ren Q’e, Gong X: Evaluation Index System for Academic Papers of Humanities and Social Sciences. Scientometrics 2012, 93(3):1047-1060. 10.1007/s11192-012-0790-x es_ES
dc.description.references Roy S: Competitiveness in Service Sector: A case of Hotel Industry in India. Glob Bus Rev 2011, 12(1):51-69. 10.1177/097215091001200104 es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty T: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1980. es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty T: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh; 1996. es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty T: Fundamentals of Decision Making and priority theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh; 2000. es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty T: Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh; 2005. es_ES
dc.description.references Shahin A, Mahbod MA: Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. Int J Product Perform Manag 2007, 56(3):226-240. 10.1108/17410400710731437 es_ES
dc.description.references Sigala M: Social networks and customer involvement in New Service Development (NSD. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 2012, 24(7):966-990. the case of http://www.mystarbucksidea.com 10.1108/09596111211258874 es_ES
dc.description.references Sirikrai S, Tang J: Industrial competitiveness analysis: Using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of High Technology Management Research 2006, 17(1):71-83. 10.1016/j.hitech.2006.05.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Smith-Perera A, García-Melón M, Poveda-Bautista R, Pastor-Ferrando J: A Project Strategic Index proposal for portfolio selection in electrical company based on the Analytic Network Process. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14(6):1569-1579. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Spendolini M: Benchmarking. Norma, New York; 1994. es_ES
dc.description.references Superdecisions: CREATIVE decision Foundation. 2009. (1 April 2010) http://www.superdecisions.com es_ES
dc.description.references Taylor PJ: Advertising and Cities: a relational geography of Globalization in the early Twenty First Century. GaWC Research Bulletin, 215. 2006. . Accessed November 19, 2012 http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb215.html es_ES
dc.description.references Taylor R, Grubbs H, Haley E: How French advertising professionals develop creative strategy. The journal of advertising 1996, 15: 1-13. es_ES
dc.description.references Temur G, Emeksizoglu B, Gozlu S: A Study on performance measurement of a Plastic Packaging Organization’s Manufacturing System by AHP Modeling. In PICMET 2007 Proceedings. Portland International Conferences on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, OR; 2007:5-9. es_ES
dc.description.references Thakkar J, Deshmukh SG, Gupta AD, Shankar R: Development of a balanced scorecard. An integrated approach of interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process(ANP). Int J Product Perform Manag 2007, 56(1):25-59. 10.1108/17410400710717073 es_ES
dc.description.references Tseng M-L: Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard. Computers and Education 2010, 55(1):188-201. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Yang C-L, Chuang S-P, Huang R-H: Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36(8):11369-11377. 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.023 es_ES
dc.description.references Yüksel I, Dagdeviren M: Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for manufacturing firm. Expert Syst Appl 2010, 37(2):1270-1278. 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.002 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem