- -

Digital flashcard L2 Vocabulary learning out-performs traditional flashcards at lower proficiency levels: A mixed-methods study of 139 Japanese university students

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Digital flashcard L2 Vocabulary learning out-performs traditional flashcards at lower proficiency levels: A mixed-methods study of 139 Japanese university students

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Ashcroft, Robert John es_ES
dc.contributor.author Cvitkovic, Robert es_ES
dc.contributor.author Praver, Max es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-25T08:04:59Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-25T08:04:59Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-31
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/116112
dc.description.abstract [EN] This study investigates the effect of using digital flashcards on L2 vocabulary learning compared to using paper flashcards, at different levels of English proficiency. Although flashcards are generally believed to be one of the most efficient vocabulary study techniques available, little empirical data is available in terms of the comparative effectiveness of digital flashcards, and at different levels of student English proficiency. This study used a mixed-methods experimental design. The between-subjects factor was English Proficiency consisting of three groups: basic, intermediate and advanced. All participants underwent both a digital flashcards treatment and paper flashcards treatment using words from the Academic Words List. For each study mode, the two dependent variables were Immediate, and Delayed Relative Vocabulary Gain. The results of this study indicated that Japanese university students of lower levels of English proficiency have significantly higher vocabulary learning gains when using digital flashcards than when using paper flashcards. Students at higher levels of proficiency performed equally well using both study modes. It appears that by compensating for the gap in metacognitive awareness and effective learning strategies between students of lower and higher levels of language proficiency, digital flashcards may provide the additional support lower-level learners need to match their advanced-level peers in terms of their rate of deliberate vocabulary acquisition. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof The EuroCALL Review
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Vocabulary es_ES
dc.subject Digital Flashcards es_ES
dc.subject Paired-associates es_ES
dc.subject Autonomy es_ES
dc.subject English Proficiency es_ES
dc.subject Academic Words List es_ES
dc.title Digital flashcard L2 Vocabulary learning out-performs traditional flashcards at lower proficiency levels: A mixed-methods study of 139 Japanese university students es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2019-01-24T13:58:14Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/eurocall.2018.7881
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Ashcroft, RJ.; Cvitkovic, R.; Praver, M. (2018). Digital flashcard L2 Vocabulary learning out-performs traditional flashcards at lower proficiency levels: A mixed-methods study of 139 Japanese university students. The EuroCALL Review. 26(1):14-28. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2018.7881 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2018.7881 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 14 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 28 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 26
dc.description.issue 1
dc.identifier.eissn 1695-2618
dc.description.references Ashcroft, R. J., & Imrie, A. C. (2014). Learning vocabulary with digital flashcards. JALT2013 Conference Proceedings, 639-646. Retrieved from http://jalt-publications.org/proceedings/issues/2014-08_2013.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: theory and practice. Hove: Erlbaum. es_ES
dc.description.references Cohen, A. D. (1993). Language learning: insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. es_ES
dc.description.references Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly,34(2), 213. doi: 10.2307/3587951 es_ES
dc.description.references Cross, D., & James, C. V. (2001). A practical handbook of language teaching. London: Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Elgort, I. (2010). Deliberate Learning and Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language. Language Learning,61(2), 367-413. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00613.x es_ES
dc.description.references Gartner Your Source for Technology Research and Insight. (n.d.). Retrieved March 07, 2017, from http://www.gartner.com/technology/home.jsp. es_ES
dc.description.references Hirschel, R., & Fritz, E. (2013). Learning vocabulary: CALL program versus vocabulary notebook. System,41(3), 639-653. es_ES
dc.description.references Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language,11, 207-223. es_ES
dc.description.references Hughes, A. (2013). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In P. J. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing New Words: Does Teaching Have Anything To Do With It? RELC Journal,28(1), 89-108. doi:10.1177/003368829702800106 es_ES
dc.description.references Lees, D. (2013). A Brief Comparison Of Digital- And Self-Made Word Cards For Vocabulary Learning. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review,18, 59-71. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from kwansei.repo.nii.ac.jp. es_ES
dc.description.references Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL,20(1), 3-20. es_ES
dc.description.references Nation, I. S., & Webb, S. A. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning. es_ES
dc.description.references Nation, I. (2003). Effective ways of building vocabulary knowledge. ESL Magazine, 14-15. es_ES
dc.description.references Nation, I. (2005). Language education: Vocabulary. In I. C. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 494-499). Oxford: Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Nation, I. (1995). Best practice in vocabulary teaching and learning. EA Journal, 7-15. Retrieved March 8, 2017, from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/1995-Best-practice.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Nikoopour, J., & Kazemi, A. (2014). Vocabulary Learning through Digitized & Non-digitized Flashcards Delivery. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1366-1373. es_ES
dc.description.references Puentedura, R. R. (2012, August 23). The SAMR Model: Background and Exemplars. Retrieved March 07, 2017, from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2012/08/23/SAMR_BackgroundExemplars.pdf. es_ES
dc.description.references Quizlet. (2017). Retrieved March 07, 2017, from https://quizlet.com. es_ES
dc.description.references Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: theory and practice (pp. 58-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University. es_ES
dc.description.references Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2002). Dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics. Harlow: Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Soanes, C. (2010). The paperback Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Suppes, P., & Crothers, E. J. (1967). Experiments in second-language learning. New York: Academic Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Webb, S. (2007). The Effects of Repetition on Vocabulary Knowledge. Applied Linguistics,28(1), 46-65. doi:10.1093/applin/aml048 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem