Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Paricio Royo, Javier | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-23T09:06:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-23T09:06:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-12-31 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1887-4592 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/141369 | |
dc.description.abstract | [ES] La implantación de sistemas de gestión de calidad en las titulaciones universitarias constituye una magnífica oportunidad para afrontar algunos problemas y retos tradicionales de la educación superior en España. Es posible en este contexto la puesta en marcha de sistemas de coordinación institucionales que profundicen en la idea de las titulaciones como proyectos colectivos en revisión y evolución permanente. Sin embargo, para que estos nuevos sistemas sean capaces de convertirse en motores de cambio de la cultura docente, de coordinación y de mejora efectiva de la experiencia de aprendizaje de los estudiantes, es necesario que sean concebidos expresamente desde la perspectiva de la mejora interna y no como meros sistemas de aseguramiento o rendición de cuentas hacia el exterior. Por un lado, esto implica diseñar los sistemas de calidad como auténticos sistemas de gobierno y coordinación académica capaces de adentrarse en el currículo y los procesos de aprendizaje del título. Por otro lado, la capacidad de estos sistemas para impulsar procesos de mejora profundos de los procesos de aprendizaje pasa por respetar la diversidad y la autonomía de titulaciones y personas, por dar una presencia importante a la voz de los estudiantes, articular el liderazgo de la titulación y poner en marcha procesos de evaluación y autoevaluación de naturaleza formativa. Basados en la experiencia de la Universidad de Zaragoza, se proponen aquí diez principios clave para diseñar sistemas de gestión de la calidad concebidos específicamente como mecanismos internos de mejora, particularmente, de la experiencia de aprendizaje de los estudiantes. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] The introduction of quality management systems in Degree and Master education programmes offers a great opportunity to face some of the most persistent problems and challenges in Spanish higher education. In this context, it is possible to think of new institutional coordination schemes to expand and deepen into the idea of a study as an evolving joint project driven by a coordinated teaching team. However, in order that these new quality management systems become powerful agents for change in teaching culture, coordination and true improvement of the students’ learning experience, they need to be thought, specifically, from an internal enhancement perspective and not from the usual external quality assurance perspective or as a device for external accountability. On one hand, it implies that quality management systems should be designed as actual academic coordination and government structures, with capacity for effective intervention on the curricula and learning processes of the studies. On the other hand, the ability of these systems for empowering deep enhancing changes on learning experiences depends on are spect of the diversity and ownership of studies and individuals, on fostering the presence of the students’ voice inside the coordination system, on giving support to leadership inside the teaching team responsible of the study and on designing good internal and formative assessment procedures. This paper, grounded on the experience at the Universidad de Zaragoza, proposes a synthesis of these requirements in ten principles for a quality management system in higher education programmes specifically oriented toward the enhancement of the students’ learning experience. | es_ES |
dc.language | Español | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Higher education | es_ES |
dc.subject | Quality | es_ES |
dc.subject | Quality assurance | es_ES |
dc.subject | Teaching | es_ES |
dc.subject | Coordination | es_ES |
dc.subject | Educational change | es_ES |
dc.subject | Educación superior | es_ES |
dc.subject | Calidad | es_ES |
dc.subject | Garantía de calidad | es_ES |
dc.subject | Coordinación | es_ES |
dc.subject | Enseñanza | es_ES |
dc.subject | Innovación educativa | es_ES |
dc.title | Diez principios para un sistema de gestión de la calidad concebido específicamente para la coordinación y la mejora interna de las titulaciones universitarias | es_ES |
dc.title.alternative | Ten Key Principles for a Quality Management System Specifically Oriented to the Internal Enhancement and Coordination of Higher Education Programmes. | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/redu.2012.6014 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Paricio Royo, J. (2012). Diez principios para un sistema de gestión de la calidad concebido específicamente para la coordinación y la mejora interna de las titulaciones universitarias. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 10(3):49-69. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6014 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | OJS | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6014 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 49 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 69 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 10 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 3 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1887-4592 | |
dc.relation.pasarela | OJS\6014 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Learning for the longer term (pp. 14‐25). New York: Routledge. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | De la Cruz, M., & Pozo, J. I. (2003). Concepciones sobre el currículo universitario: ¿centrado en los contenidos o en los alumnos? In C. Monereo & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), La Universidad ante la nueva cultura educativa: enseñar y aprender para la autonomía. Madrid: Síntesis. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | De Miguel Díaz, M. (2009). Aseguramiento versus garantía de calidad en el sistema universitario español. Boletín de Psicología, 97, 35‐54. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Doolittle, G., Sudeck, M., & Rattigan, P. (2008). Creating Professional Learning Communities: The Work of Professional Development Schools. Theory Into Practice, 47, 303-310. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Elliott, G. (1993). Whose Quality Is It, Anyway? Assumptions Underlying Quality Models in Further Education. Quality Assurance in Education, 1(1), 34‐40. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | ENQA (European Association for Quality Assurance). (2005). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: ENQA. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Esteve Mon, F. M., Galán Palomares, F. M., & Pastor Valcárcel, M. C. (2011). 2005‐ 2010: 5 years of student participation in Quality Assurance in Spain. A review about the beginning of student participation in Quality Assurance at a national level in Spain, experiences and future challenges. In A. Blättler, L. Bollaert, F. Crozier, J. Grifoll, A. i. Hyland, T. Loukkola, B. Michalk, A. Päll & B. Stensaker (Eds.), Building bridges: Making sense of quality assurance in european, national and institutional contexts. A selection of papers from the 5th european quality assurance forum, University Claude Bernard Lyon1, 18‐20 november 2010 (pp. 25‐31). Brussels, Belgium: European University Association. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | EUA (European University Association). (2009). Improving Quality, Enhancing Creativity: Change Processes in European Higher Education Institutions. Brussels: QAHECA Project, EUA Publications. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Nueva York: Teachers College Press. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gordon, G. (2002). The Roles of Leadership and Ownership in Building an Effective Quality Culture. Quality in Higher Education, 8(8). | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student success in college: creating conditions that matter (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lechleiter, H. (2010). Quality assurance and internal institutional diversity. In A. Blättler, L. Bollaert, B. Curvale, L. Harvey, E. Helle, H. T. Jensen, T. Loukkola, B. Michalk & K. B. Nielsen (Eds.), Creativity and diversity: Challenges for quality assurance beyond 2010. A selection of papers from the 4th European Quality Assurance Forum. 19‐21 November 2009 (pp. 57‐61). Brussels, Belgium: European University Association. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Marris, P. (1975). Loss and change. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading Academics. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Neave, G. (1994). The Politics of Quality: Developments in Higher Education in Western Europe 1992‐1994. European Journal for Education, 29(2), 115‐133. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Neave, G. (1998). The Evaluative State Reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265‐284. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Neave, G. (2004). The Bologna Process and the Evaluative State: a Viticultural Parable. In UNESCO (Ed.), Managerialism and Evaluation in Higher Education. Collected papers of the First Regional Research Seminar for Europe and North America. Paris, France, 4‐5 November 2004. UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper Series Paper no. 7. Paris: UNESCO. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Newton, J. (2002). Views from Below: academics coping with quality. Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), 39‐61. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Paricio Royo, J. (2010). El reto de institucionalizar la coordinación y la integración docente. In J. Rué & L. Lodeiro (Eds.), Equipos docentes y nuevas identidades académicas en educación superior. Madrid: Narcea. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Paricio Royo, J. (2011). Quality, Quality Assurance, Standardisation and Enhancement. The View from the Spanish Higher Education Experience. European Journal of Qualifications(5), 16‐24. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead. London: Routledge. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Saunders, M. (2011). Setting the scene: the four domains of evaluative practice in higher education. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler & V. Bamber (Eds.), Reconceptualising Evaluation in Higher Education (pp. 1‐17): McGraw‐Hill, SRHE & Open University Press. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Saxe, E. B. (2009). Diseño curricular: de la integración a la complejidad. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 9(2), 1‐13. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Stråhlman, C. (2011). Partners or Counterparts? Student Involvement in Management and Quality Assurance at Lund University. In A. Blättler, L. Bollaert, F. Crozier, J. Grifoll, A. i. Hyland, T. Loukkola, B. Michalk, A. Päll & B. stensaker (Eds.), Building bridges: Making sense of quality assurance in european, national and institutional contexts. A selection of papers from the 5th european quality assurance forum, University Claude Bernard Lyon1, 18‐20 november 2010 (pp. 64‐68). Brussels, Belgium: European University Association. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tinto, V. (1999). Taking retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 19(2), 5‐9. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tinto, V., & Pusser, B. (2006). Moving From Theory to Action: Building a Model of Institutional Action for Student Success. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Westerheijden, D. F. (2007). States and Europe and Quality of Higher Education. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Trends in regulation, Translation and Transformation (pp. 73‐95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yorke, M. (2000). Developing a quality culture in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(1), 19‐36 | es_ES |