- -

Diez principios para un sistema de gestión de la calidad concebido específicamente para la coordinación y la mejora interna de las titulaciones universitarias

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Diez principios para un sistema de gestión de la calidad concebido específicamente para la coordinación y la mejora interna de las titulaciones universitarias

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Paricio Royo, J. (2012). Diez principios para un sistema de gestión de la calidad concebido específicamente para la coordinación y la mejora interna de las titulaciones universitarias. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 10(3):49-69. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6014

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/141369

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Diez principios para un sistema de gestión de la calidad concebido específicamente para la coordinación y la mejora interna de las titulaciones universitarias
Otro titulo: Ten Key Principles for a Quality Management System Specifically Oriented to the Internal Enhancement and Coordination of Higher Education Programmes.
Autor: Paricio Royo, Javier
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[ES] La implantación de sistemas de gestión de calidad en las titulaciones universitarias constituye una magnífica oportunidad para afrontar algunos problemas y retos tradicionales de la educación superior en España. Es ...[+]


[EN] The introduction of quality management systems in Degree and Master education programmes offers a great opportunity to face some of the most persistent problems and challenges in Spanish higher education. In this ...[+]
Palabras clave: Higher education , Quality , Quality assurance , Teaching , Coordination , Educational change , Educación superior , Calidad , Garantía de calidad , Coordinación , Enseñanza , Innovación educativa
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Fuente:
REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. (issn: 1887-4592 ) (eissn: 1887-4592 )
DOI: 10.4995/redu.2012.6014
Editorial:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6014
Tipo: Artículo

References

Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Learning for the longer term (pp. 14‐25). New York: Routledge.

De la Cruz, M., & Pozo, J. I. (2003). Concepciones sobre el currículo universitario: ¿centrado en los contenidos o en los alumnos? In C. Monereo & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), La Universidad ante la nueva cultura educativa: enseñar y aprender para la autonomía. Madrid: Síntesis.

De Miguel Díaz, M. (2009). Aseguramiento versus garantía de calidad en el sistema universitario español. Boletín de Psicología, 97, 35‐54. [+]
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Learning for the longer term (pp. 14‐25). New York: Routledge.

De la Cruz, M., & Pozo, J. I. (2003). Concepciones sobre el currículo universitario: ¿centrado en los contenidos o en los alumnos? In C. Monereo & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), La Universidad ante la nueva cultura educativa: enseñar y aprender para la autonomía. Madrid: Síntesis.

De Miguel Díaz, M. (2009). Aseguramiento versus garantía de calidad en el sistema universitario español. Boletín de Psicología, 97, 35‐54.

Doolittle, G., Sudeck, M., & Rattigan, P. (2008). Creating Professional Learning Communities: The Work of Professional Development Schools. Theory Into Practice, 47, 303-310.

Elliott, G. (1993). Whose Quality Is It, Anyway? Assumptions Underlying Quality Models in Further Education. Quality Assurance in Education, 1(1), 34‐40.

ENQA (European Association for Quality Assurance). (2005). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: ENQA.

Esteve Mon, F. M., Galán Palomares, F. M., & Pastor Valcárcel, M. C. (2011). 2005‐ 2010: 5 years of student participation in Quality Assurance in Spain. A review about the beginning of student participation in Quality Assurance at a national level in Spain, experiences and future challenges. In A. Blättler, L. Bollaert, F. Crozier, J. Grifoll, A. i. Hyland, T. Loukkola, B. Michalk, A. Päll & B. Stensaker (Eds.), Building bridges: Making sense of quality assurance in european, national and institutional contexts. A selection of papers from the 5th european quality assurance forum, University Claude Bernard Lyon1, 18‐20 november 2010 (pp. 25‐31). Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.

EUA (European University Association). (2009). Improving Quality, Enhancing Creativity: Change Processes in European Higher Education Institutions. Brussels: QAHECA Project, EUA Publications.

Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.

Gordon, G. (2002). The Roles of Leadership and Ownership in Building an Effective Quality Culture. Quality in Higher Education, 8(8).

Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student success in college: creating conditions that matter (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

Lechleiter, H. (2010). Quality assurance and internal institutional diversity. In A. Blättler, L. Bollaert, B. Curvale, L. Harvey, E. Helle, H. T. Jensen, T. Loukkola, B. Michalk & K. B. Nielsen (Eds.), Creativity and diversity: Challenges for quality assurance beyond 2010. A selection of papers from the 4th European Quality Assurance Forum. 19‐21 November 2009 (pp. 57‐61). Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.

Marris, P. (1975). Loss and change. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading Academics. Buckingham: SHRE and Open University Press.

Neave, G. (1994). The Politics of Quality: Developments in Higher Education in Western Europe 1992‐1994. European Journal for Education, 29(2), 115‐133.

Neave, G. (1998). The Evaluative State Reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265‐284.

Neave, G. (2004). The Bologna Process and the Evaluative State: a Viticultural Parable. In UNESCO (Ed.), Managerialism and Evaluation in Higher Education. Collected papers of the First Regional Research Seminar for Europe and North America. Paris, France, 4‐5 November 2004. UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper Series Paper no. 7. Paris: UNESCO.

Newton, J. (2002). Views from Below: academics coping with quality. Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), 39‐61.

Paricio Royo, J. (2010). El reto de institucionalizar la coordinación y la integración docente. In J. Rué & L. Lodeiro (Eds.), Equipos docentes y nuevas identidades académicas en educación superior. Madrid: Narcea.

Paricio Royo, J. (2011). Quality, Quality Assurance, Standardisation and Enhancement. The View from the Spanish Higher Education Experience. European Journal of Qualifications(5), 16‐24.

Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead. London: Routledge.

Saunders, M. (2011). Setting the scene: the four domains of evaluative practice in higher education. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler & V. Bamber (Eds.), Reconceptualising Evaluation in Higher Education (pp. 1‐17): McGraw‐Hill, SRHE & Open University Press.

Saxe, E. B. (2009). Diseño curricular: de la integración a la complejidad. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 9(2), 1‐13.

Stråhlman, C. (2011). Partners or Counterparts? Student Involvement in Management and Quality Assurance at Lund University. In A. Blättler, L. Bollaert, F. Crozier, J. Grifoll, A. i. Hyland, T. Loukkola, B. Michalk, A. Päll & B. stensaker (Eds.), Building bridges: Making sense of quality assurance in european, national and institutional contexts. A selection of papers from the 5th european quality assurance forum, University Claude Bernard Lyon1, 18‐20 november 2010 (pp. 64‐68). Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.

Tinto, V. (1999). Taking retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 19(2), 5‐9.

Tinto, V., & Pusser, B. (2006). Moving From Theory to Action: Building a Model of Institutional Action for Student Success. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.

Westerheijden, D. F. (2007). States and Europe and Quality of Higher Education. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Trends in regulation, Translation and Transformation (pp. 73‐95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Yorke, M. (2000). Developing a quality culture in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(1), 19‐36

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem