- -

Seeking a common ground for the Nautical Archaeology Digital Library (NADL). Reflections on science, method, theory and templates

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Seeking a common ground for the Nautical Archaeology Digital Library (NADL). Reflections on science, method, theory and templates

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Borrero L., R.; Schwindingera, P.; Castelli, A.; Ciarlo, NC.; Torres, R.; Manders, M.; Castro, F.... (2021). Seeking a common ground for the Nautical Archaeology Digital Library (NADL). Reflections on science, method, theory and templates. Virtual Archaeology Review. 12(24):11-24. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2021.14331

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/161420

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Seeking a common ground for the Nautical Archaeology Digital Library (NADL). Reflections on science, method, theory and templates
Otro titulo: En busca de un horizonte común para la Biblioteca digital de arqueología náutica (NADL). Reflexiones sobre ciencia, método, teoría y plantillas
Autor: Borrero L., Ricardo Schwindingera, Patricia Castelli, Ana Ciarlo, Nicolas C. Torres, Rodrigo Manders, Martijn Castro, Filipe Furuta, Richard
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] Data sharing is a fundamental process for the advancement of both natural and social sciences. Starting from the idea that computers and the internet have drastically changed the world in the last decades, this paper ...[+]


[ES] Compartir información es un proceso fundamental para el desarrollo de las ciencias naturales y sociales. Partiendo de la idea de que las computadoras e Internet han cambiado drásticamente el mundo en las últimas ...[+]
Palabras clave: Estandarización , Datos primarios , Fuente abierta , Arqueología náutica , Arqueología marítima , Arqueología digital , Standardization , Primary data , Open-source publication , Nautical archaeology , Maritime archaeology , Digital archaeology
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Fuente:
Virtual Archaeology Review. (eissn: 1989-9947 )
DOI: 10.4995/var.2021.14331
Editorial:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2021.14331
Agradecimientos:
This paper is a result of a T3 Texas A&M University grant. We want to thank the NADL community for their input. This paper is based on extensive discussions among the community. We would also like to thank Prof. José Luis ...[+]
Tipo: Artículo

References

Adams, J. (2001). Ships and Boats as Archaeological Source Material. World Archaeology, 32(3), 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240120048644

Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests, and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(2), 198-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002

Berkeley, G. (1998). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Oxford University Press. [+]
Adams, J. (2001). Ships and Boats as Archaeological Source Material. World Archaeology, 32(3), 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240120048644

Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests, and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(2), 198-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002

Berkeley, G. (1998). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Oxford University Press.

Campbell, R. N. (2009). What is Science? London: Cornell University Library.

Castro, F., Bendig, C., Bérubé, M., Borrero, R., Budsberg, N., Dostal, C., Monteiro, A., Smith, C., Torres, R., & Yamafune, K. (2018). Recording, Publishing, and Reconstructing Wooden Shipwrecks. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 13(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-017-9185-8

Coseriu, E. (1977). Principios de semántica structural. Madrid: Gredos.

Doerr, M., Bekiari, C., Bruseker, G., Ore, C-E., Stead, & Velios, S. T. (Eds.). (2020). Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Volume A. ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group and CRM Special Interest Group. Version 7.1, October 2020. Retrieved 28th October, 2020, from: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/CIDOC%20CRM_v.7.0.1_%2018-10-2020.pdf

Eerkens, J. W. & Bettinger, R. L. (2001). Techniques for Assessing Standardization in Artifact Assemblages: Can we Scale Material Variability? American Antiquity, 66(3), 493 -504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694247

Eiteljorg, H. (2004). Computing for Archaeologists. In S. Schreibman, R. & J. Unsworth, A companion to digital humanities (pp. 20-30). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Frege, F. L. G. (1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Vol. 2. Jena: Verlag Hermann Pohle.

Ford, B. (Ed.) (2011). The Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8210-0

Furuta, R., Monroy, C., & Castro, F. (2007a). Ancient Technical Manuscripts: the Case of 17th-century Portuguese Shipbuilding Treatises. In S. Schmidt, R. Siemens, A. Kumar & J. Unsworth (Eds.), Digital Humanities 2007 Conference Proceedings (pp.67-69). Urbana-Champagne: University of Illinois.

Furuta, R., Monroy, C., & Castro, F. (2007b). A Multilingual Approach to Technical Manuscripts: 16th and 17th-century Portuguese Shipbuilding Treatises. In E. Rasmussen (Chair), Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp.413-414). Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Hill, R., (1994). A Dynamic Context Recording and Modeling System for Archaeology. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 23(2), 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.1994.tb00453.x

Huggett, J. (2012a). Lost in information? Ways of knowing and modes of representation in e-archaeology. World Archaeology, 44(4), 538-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2012.736274

Huggett, J. (2012b). Core or periphery? Digital Humanities from an archaeological perspective. Historische Sozialforschung, 37 (3), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.3.86-105

Klimovsky, G. (2005). Las desventuras del conocimiento científico. Buenos Aires: A-Z Editora.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). La tensión esencial: tradición e innovación en la investigación científica. In T. Kuhn (Ed.), La tensión esencial. Estudios selectos sobre la tradición y el cambio en el ámbito de la ciencia (pp. 248-262). México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lock, G. (2003). Using computers in Archaeology: Towards virtual pasts. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2003.11078213

Lock, G., & Molyneaux, B. (Eds.) (2006). Confronting Scale in Archaeology. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32773-8

Losee, J. (1981). Introducción histórica a la filosofía de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza. Translation of the 1st Edition.

Mach, E., (1959). The Analysis of Sensations. New York: Dover Publications.

Manders, M., Oosting, R., & Brouwers, W. (2009). MACHU Final Report Nr. 3. Rotterdam: Educom Publishers B.V.

Menéndez, E. (1999). Uso y desuso de conceptos: ¿dónde quedaron los olvidos? Alteridades, 9(17): 147-164.

Mill, J. S. (2002). A System of Logic. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.

Monroy, C., Parks, N., Furuta, R., & Castro, F. (2006). The Nautical Archaeology Digital Library. In Gonzalo et al. (Eds.), European Conference on Digital Libraries 2006 LNCS 4172 (pp. 544-547). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Monroy, C., Furuta, R., & Castro, F., (2007). Texts, Illustrations, and Physical Objects: The Case of Ancient Shipbuilding Treatises. 11th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries ECDL, Budapest, Hungary.

Monroy, C., Furuta, R., & Castro, F. (2009). Ask Not What Your Text Can do For You. Ask What You Can do For Your Text (a Dictionary's perspective). Digital Humanities. University of Maryland, MD: College Park. 344-347.

Monroy, C., Furuta, R., & Castro, F. (2010). "Using an Ontology and a Multilingual Glossary for Enhancing the Nautical Archaeology Digital Library". Joint Conference on Digital Libraries JCDL, Queensland, Australia, 259-262.

Muckleroy, K. (1976). The integration of historical and archaeological data concerning an historic wreck site: The 'Kennemerland'. World Archaeology, 7(3), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1976.9979641

Muckleroy, K. (1978). Maritime Archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York, NY: Harcourt.

Nieto Prieto, X. (1997). Le commerce de cabotage et de redistribution. In P. Pomey (Ed.), La navigation dans l'Antiquité (pp. 146-159). Aix-en-Provence: Edisud.

Pomey, P. (2011). Defining a Ship: Architecture, Function, and Human Space. In A. Catsambis, B. Ford & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Maritime Archaeology (pp. 25-46). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336005.001.0001

Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060577

Sautu, R. (2005). Todo es teoría. Objetivos y métodos de investigación. Buenos Aires: Lumiere.

Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity, 37(2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/278203

Schiffer, M. B. (1987). Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

Shanks, M. & McGuire, R. H. (1996). The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity, 61(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600050046

Steffy, J. (1990). Problems and Progress in Dating Ancient Vessels by their Construction Features. In H. Tzalas, (Ed.), Tropis II, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Ship Construction in Antiquity (pp.315-320). Athens.

Steffy, J. (1995). Ancient Scantlings: The Projection and Control of Ancient Hull Shapes. In H. Tzalas, (Ed.), Tropis III, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Ship Construction in Antiquity (pp.417-428). Athens.

Thomas, J. (2015). Why 'The Death of Archaeological Theory'?. In C. Hillerdal & J. Siapkas (Eds.), Debating Archaeological Empiricism: The Ambiguity of Material Evidence (pp. 11-31). London: Routledge.

Tudhope, D., Binding, C., Jeffrey, S., May, K., & Vlachidis, A. (2011). A STELLAR role for knowledge organization systems in digital archaeology. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 43(5), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2011.1720370405

Torres, R. (2017). Arqueologia Histórica na Era Digital. Revista Latino-Americana de Arqueología Histórica, 11(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.31239/vtg.v11i1.10547

Weitz, M. (1977). The Opening Mind. A Philosophical Study of Humanistic Concepts. London: University of Chicago Press.

Westerdahl, C. (1992). The Maritime Landscape. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 21(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.1992.tb00336.x

Wittgenstein, L. (2006). Sobre la certeza. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa, S.A.

Vidal Torres Caballero, J. (1994). Reflexiones sobre la terminología lingüístico-gramatical. Cauce: Revista de filología y su didáctica, 17, 83-106.

Zeltwanger, H. (2015). A short history of standardization and CAN. Control Engineering, Digital Edition, February 16. Retrieved July 29th, 2020, from: https://www.controleng.com/

Zubrow, E. (2006). Digital Archaeology. A historical context. In T. Evans and P. Daly (Eds.), Digital Archaeology. Bridging method and theory (pp. 8-26). London: Routledge.

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem